RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    지표를 활용한 한국의 경제사회발전 연구: OECD 회원국과의 비교분석 = Economic and Social Development of Korea: A Cross-National Indicator Comparison between Korea and OECD Countries

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99872888

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The study evaluates Korea`s current status of economic and social development with the design of economic and social development indicator (ESDI). This indicator is composed of three categories, including growth engine, social integration, and environmental protection. The indicator analysis demonstrates both the characteristics of each country and the general developmental trajectory of the OECD countries. Especially, this study reveals that by comparison with OECD countries, Korea is relatively short in the 2nd and 3rd categories. Through a policy simulation analysis, this study also finds that Korea needs a structural reform to upgrade its current status. Therefore, we suggest that for further upgrade of economic and social development, Korea should focus more on social integration aspects.
    번역하기

    The study evaluates Korea`s current status of economic and social development with the design of economic and social development indicator (ESDI). This indicator is composed of three categories, including growth engine, social integration, and environ...

    The study evaluates Korea`s current status of economic and social development with the design of economic and social development indicator (ESDI). This indicator is composed of three categories, including growth engine, social integration, and environmental protection. The indicator analysis demonstrates both the characteristics of each country and the general developmental trajectory of the OECD countries. Especially, this study reveals that by comparison with OECD countries, Korea is relatively short in the 2nd and 3rd categories. Through a policy simulation analysis, this study also finds that Korea needs a structural reform to upgrade its current status. Therefore, we suggest that for further upgrade of economic and social development, Korea should focus more on social integration aspects.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박명호, "한국경제․사회 선진화의 조건(Ⅲ): 경제사회발전트렌드 분석: 지표 연구" 경제인문사회연구회 2011

    2 송치웅, "에너지다소비산업에서의 기술혁신 결정요인 분석-에너지저소비산업과의 비교" 2011

    3 "http://www.wvsevsdb.com/wvs/WVSData.jsp?Idioma=I"

    4 "http://www.who.int/research/en/"

    5 "http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/cst_allh.htm"

    6 "http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk"

    7 "http://www.turkstat.gov.tr"

    8 "http://www.transparency.org/research/cpi"

    9 "http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org"

    10 "http://www.oecd.org/publications/factbook/"

    1 박명호, "한국경제․사회 선진화의 조건(Ⅲ): 경제사회발전트렌드 분석: 지표 연구" 경제인문사회연구회 2011

    2 송치웅, "에너지다소비산업에서의 기술혁신 결정요인 분석-에너지저소비산업과의 비교" 2011

    3 "http://www.wvsevsdb.com/wvs/WVSData.jsp?Idioma=I"

    4 "http://www.who.int/research/en/"

    5 "http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/cst_allh.htm"

    6 "http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk"

    7 "http://www.turkstat.gov.tr"

    8 "http://www.transparency.org/research/cpi"

    9 "http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org"

    10 "http://www.oecd.org/publications/factbook/"

    11 "http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/publications_and_e-products/management_ standards_publications.htm"

    12 "http://www.irtad.net"

    13 "http://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/natlex_browse.subject?p_lang=en"

    14 "http://www.heritage.org/Index"

    15 "http://www.freedomhouse.org"

    16 "http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/main/index.stm"

    17 "http://www.eia.gov/countries/data.cfm"

    18 "http://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html"

    19 "http://unstats.un.org/unsd/environment/Time%20series.htm"

    20 "http://stats.uis.unesco.org"

    21 "http://stats.oecd.org"

    22 "http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/entri/treatySearch.jsp"

    23 "http://nodedge.com/CIAWFB"

    24 "http://laborsta.ilo.org"

    25 "http://go.worldbank.org/X23UD9QUX0"

    26 "http://databank.worldbank.org"

    27 Biderman, A. D., "Social Indicators and Goals, In Social Indicators" MIT Press 1966

    28 Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, "Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress" 2009

    29 Wackernagel, M., "Perceptual and Structural Barriers to Investing in Natural Capital: Economics from an Ecological Footprint Perspective" 20 (20): 3-24, 1997

    30 Henderson, Hazel, "Paradigms in Progress: Life Beyond Economics" Knowledge Systems Inc. 1991

    31 OECD, "OECD Better Life Index"

    32 이영섭, "NRCS Indicator: Global Economic and Social Trends" Random House 2010

    33 Ministerial Council, Monitoring Economic Performance, Quality of Life and Sustainability, "Joint Report by German Council of Economic Experts/Conceil d’Analyse Economique" 2010

    34 Nordhaus, W.D., "Is Growth Obsolete?, In The Measurement of Economic and Social Performance, Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. 38" National Bureau of Economic Research 509-532, 1973

    35 Osberg, L., "How Should We Measure the ‘Economic’ Aspects of Well-being?" 51 (51): 311-336, 2005

    36 Veenhoven, R., "Happy Life-Expectancy: A Comprehensive Measure of Quality-of-Life in Nations" 39 : 1-58, 1996

    37 Daly, H.E., "For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy toward Community, the Environment and a Sustainable Future" Beacon Press 1989

    38 Easterlin, Richard A., "Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence, In Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz" Academic Press 1974

    39 Diener, E., "Assessing Subjective Well-being : Progress and Opportunities" 31 (31): 103-157, 1994

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-07-30 학술지명변경 외국어명 : KYONG JE HAK YON GU -> The Korean Journal of Economic Studies KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.91 0.91 0.95
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.91 0.94 1.539 0.14
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼