RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      양면시장에서 플랫폼 경쟁과 개방 기술 효과 = Platform Competition and Open Source Technology in Two-Sided Markets

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99872402

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper investigates the effects of the open source technology when user groups are single-homers or multi-homers in a two-sided market. We consider two schemes of technology adoption by the platforms as follows: the Scheme One is both of two platforms take the proprietary technology, and the Scheme Two is one platform takes the open source technology, with another platform taking the proprietary technology. In a single-homing case when the switching cost for adopting the open source technology is low, social welfare under the Scheme Two is higher than that under the Scheme One. The same result is obtained in a multi-homing case. Under the Scheme Two, social welfare with the multi-homing is higher than that with the single-homing, even though the profit of a open source platform under the multi-homing is same as that under the single-homing. This implies the two-sided market with the open source technology is superior to that with the proprietary technology when the multihoming is allowed.
      번역하기

      This paper investigates the effects of the open source technology when user groups are single-homers or multi-homers in a two-sided market. We consider two schemes of technology adoption by the platforms as follows: the Scheme One is both of two platf...

      This paper investigates the effects of the open source technology when user groups are single-homers or multi-homers in a two-sided market. We consider two schemes of technology adoption by the platforms as follows: the Scheme One is both of two platforms take the proprietary technology, and the Scheme Two is one platform takes the open source technology, with another platform taking the proprietary technology. In a single-homing case when the switching cost for adopting the open source technology is low, social welfare under the Scheme Two is higher than that under the Scheme One. The same result is obtained in a multi-homing case. Under the Scheme Two, social welfare with the multi-homing is higher than that with the single-homing, even though the profit of a open source platform under the multi-homing is same as that under the single-homing. This implies the two-sided market with the open source technology is superior to that with the proprietary technology when the multihoming is allowed.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 손상영, "이종 플랫폼간 경쟁과 사회후생" 한국산업조직학회 19 (19): 1-40, 2011

      2 이상규, "양면시장의 정의 및 조건" 정보통신정책학회 17 (17): 73-105, 2010

      3 Choi, J. P., "Tying in Two-sided Markets with Multi-Homing" 58 (58): 607-626, 2010

      4 Parker, G., "Two-Sided Network Effects : A Theory of Information Product Design" 51 (51): 1494-1504, 2005

      5 Armstrong, M., "Two-Sided Markets, Competitive Bottlenecks and Exclusive Contracts" 32 (32): 353-380, 2007

      6 Gabszewicz, J., "Two-Sided Markets and Price Competition with Multi-Homing"

      7 Rochet, J. C., "Two-Sided Markets : A Progress Report" 37 (37): 668-691, 2006

      8 Economides, N., "Two-Sided Competition of Proprietary vs. Open Source Technology Platforms and the Implications for the Software Industry" 52 (52): 1057-1071, 2006

      9 Rysman, M., "The Economics of Two-Sided Markets" 23 (23): 125-143, 2009

      10 Rochet, J. C., "Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets" 1 (1): 990-1029, 2003

      1 손상영, "이종 플랫폼간 경쟁과 사회후생" 한국산업조직학회 19 (19): 1-40, 2011

      2 이상규, "양면시장의 정의 및 조건" 정보통신정책학회 17 (17): 73-105, 2010

      3 Choi, J. P., "Tying in Two-sided Markets with Multi-Homing" 58 (58): 607-626, 2010

      4 Parker, G., "Two-Sided Network Effects : A Theory of Information Product Design" 51 (51): 1494-1504, 2005

      5 Armstrong, M., "Two-Sided Markets, Competitive Bottlenecks and Exclusive Contracts" 32 (32): 353-380, 2007

      6 Gabszewicz, J., "Two-Sided Markets and Price Competition with Multi-Homing"

      7 Rochet, J. C., "Two-Sided Markets : A Progress Report" 37 (37): 668-691, 2006

      8 Economides, N., "Two-Sided Competition of Proprietary vs. Open Source Technology Platforms and the Implications for the Software Industry" 52 (52): 1057-1071, 2006

      9 Rysman, M., "The Economics of Two-Sided Markets" 23 (23): 125-143, 2009

      10 Rochet, J. C., "Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets" 1 (1): 990-1029, 2003

      11 Katz, M. L., "Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility" 75 (75): 424-440, 1985

      12 Doganoglu, T., "Multihoming and Compatibility" 24 : 45-67, 2006

      13 Armstrong, M., "Competition in Two-Sided Markets" 37 (37): 668-691, 2006

      14 Caillaud B., "Chicken and Egg : Competition among Intermediation Service Providers" 32 (32): 309-328, 2003

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.58 0.58 0.52
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.45 0.36 0.783 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼