RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    60년 한미동맹의 지속과 변화

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99867307

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    For 60 years, the alliance between South Korea and the United States has been firm and strong while South Korea has borne untold dilemma of the asymmetrical aspects of the alliance so as to achieve the perpetual peaceful relationship between two Koreas. It reflects shared security interests of South Korea and the United States to cope with extension of communist on the peninsula. Today it appears to be on a path toward the reregulation of the ROK-US alliance each other, leading many to reconsider positively about the future of the alliance. It needs to improve a redefinition of the ROK-US alliance and establish a more reasonable alliance strategy for the future. The key question today, as the United States and South Korea enter their own way, is not whether that relationship can be sustained, but whether what it works for, with friends and supporters of the alliance in both countries. In advance, beyond the current US-dominated alliance, it is necessary to make an effort to establish a sound alliance strategy for the future based on the expanded definition as follows; i) the alliance must basically works for the best interests of the counter-North Korean. It must stay on the function of the alliance against Pyongyang. ⅱ) The current US-dominated alliance would change to one with significant security of Seoul and a peninsula orientation. ⅲ) Korea needs a strong and forward-looking US-ROK alliance to coordinate conflicts in the Northeast Asia as well as on the Korean peninsula. In addition, the two countries needs focus on strengthening security and economic cooperation, and try to find ways to work out the regional political issues.
    번역하기

    For 60 years, the alliance between South Korea and the United States has been firm and strong while South Korea has borne untold dilemma of the asymmetrical aspects of the alliance so as to achieve the perpetual peaceful relationship between two Korea...

    For 60 years, the alliance between South Korea and the United States has been firm and strong while South Korea has borne untold dilemma of the asymmetrical aspects of the alliance so as to achieve the perpetual peaceful relationship between two Koreas. It reflects shared security interests of South Korea and the United States to cope with extension of communist on the peninsula. Today it appears to be on a path toward the reregulation of the ROK-US alliance each other, leading many to reconsider positively about the future of the alliance. It needs to improve a redefinition of the ROK-US alliance and establish a more reasonable alliance strategy for the future. The key question today, as the United States and South Korea enter their own way, is not whether that relationship can be sustained, but whether what it works for, with friends and supporters of the alliance in both countries. In advance, beyond the current US-dominated alliance, it is necessary to make an effort to establish a sound alliance strategy for the future based on the expanded definition as follows; i) the alliance must basically works for the best interests of the counter-North Korean. It must stay on the function of the alliance against Pyongyang. ⅱ) The current US-dominated alliance would change to one with significant security of Seoul and a peninsula orientation. ⅲ) Korea needs a strong and forward-looking US-ROK alliance to coordinate conflicts in the Northeast Asia as well as on the Korean peninsula. In addition, the two countries needs focus on strengthening security and economic cooperation, and try to find ways to work out the regional political issues.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "한미연합사’를 ‘연합전구사령부’로 한국군이 사령관, 미군은 부사령관"

    2 이철순, "한미상호방위조약과 이승만"

    3 박민형, "한미동맹의 비대칭성 형성 요인과 극복 전략" 한국국방연구원 26 (26): 125-153, 2010

    4 서재정, "한미동맹은 영구화하는가" 한울 2009

    5 이상현, "한미동맹 50년의 성찰과 한미관계의 미래" 세종연구소 9 (9): 37-64, 2003

    6 "한미 방위비분담 3차 협상 첫날…견해차 여전"

    7 이한빈, "통일한국을 위한 경국책" 박영사 1991

    8 김예경, "중국의 영향력 균형(balance of influence) 전략과 제3세계 외교: 과거의 경험, 그리고 오늘날의 함의" 세종연구소 16 (16): 5-32, 2010

    9 이종석, "중·소의 북한 내정간섭 사례연구 8월 종파사건" 6 (6): 381-419, 2010

    10 이삼성, "주한미군 전략의 변화와 한ㆍ미동맹 양식의 전략적 재검토" 통일연구원 13 (13): 53-88, 2004

    1 "한미연합사’를 ‘연합전구사령부’로 한국군이 사령관, 미군은 부사령관"

    2 이철순, "한미상호방위조약과 이승만"

    3 박민형, "한미동맹의 비대칭성 형성 요인과 극복 전략" 한국국방연구원 26 (26): 125-153, 2010

    4 서재정, "한미동맹은 영구화하는가" 한울 2009

    5 이상현, "한미동맹 50년의 성찰과 한미관계의 미래" 세종연구소 9 (9): 37-64, 2003

    6 "한미 방위비분담 3차 협상 첫날…견해차 여전"

    7 이한빈, "통일한국을 위한 경국책" 박영사 1991

    8 김예경, "중국의 영향력 균형(balance of influence) 전략과 제3세계 외교: 과거의 경험, 그리고 오늘날의 함의" 세종연구소 16 (16): 5-32, 2010

    9 이종석, "중·소의 북한 내정간섭 사례연구 8월 종파사건" 6 (6): 381-419, 2010

    10 이삼성, "주한미군 전략의 변화와 한ㆍ미동맹 양식의 전략적 재검토" 통일연구원 13 (13): 53-88, 2004

    11 서동만, "전시 작전통제권 환수와 한국의 안보개념" (40) : 2006

    12 대통령자문 정책기획위원회, "전시 작전통제권 환수 문제의 이해"

    13 한표욱, "이승만과 한미외교" 중앙일보사 1996

    14 마상윤, "오바마 행정부의 안보전략과 한미동맹: 현실주의 역외균형론을 넘어서" 세종연구소 16 (16): 5-33, 2010

    15 정경영, "오바마 행정부와 한미 전략 동맹" 한울 아카데미 2009

    16 이상철, "안보와 자주성 의 딜레마: 비대칭 동맹 이론과 한미 동맹" 연경문화사 2004

    17 동아시아연구원, "미중 정상회담 이후 한국: 비대칭 연미·연중전략과 한반도 비핵평화체제의 모색"

    18 정항석, "미국패권의 이해" 평민사 2001

    19 Bennett, Bruce W., "미국의 시각에서 바라본 한미 동맹" (23) : 88-113, 2001

    20 "미국 2분기 경제성장률 1.7%...전망치 2배" Voice of America

    21 J.Stapleton, Roy, "동북아의 변화하는 전략 환경과 한미관계의 미래" (23) : 65-87, 2001

    22 Walt, Stephen M., "동북아 안보환경 급변하는 상황… 한국, 中이냐 美냐 선택 순간 올 것" 동아일보

    23 이수형, "동맹의 안보딜레마와 포기-연루의 순환: 북핵문제를 둘러싼 한·미 갈등 관계를 중심으로" 39 (39): 21-38, 1999

    24 정하용, "단극 체계와 동맹 정치" 세종연구소 18 (18): 107-131, 2012

    25 "http://www.voakorea.com/content/article/1703482.html"

    26 "http://www.trustprocess.kr/sub/learn_text.asp#textLis01_list"

    27 "http://www.state.gov/r/"

    28 "http://www.pressian.com/article/article.asp?article_num=50130422093646"

    29 "http://www.pressian.com/article/article.asp?article_num=30120625091514"

    30 "http://www.president.go.kr/util/search.php"

    31 "http://www.mofa.go.kr/webmodule/htsboard/template/read/korboardread.j sp?typeID=6&boardid=9795&seqno=342607"

    32 "http://www.mofa.go.kr/webmodule/htsboard/template/read/korboardread.j sp?typeID=24&boardid=11695&seqno=3586&c=&t=&pagenu m=1&tableName=TYPE_KORBOARD&pc=&dc=&wc=&lu=& vu=&iu=&du="

    33 "http://www.mnd.go.kr:8088/mndPolicy/hanmiSecurity/hanmiSecurityScm/i ndex.jsp?topMenuNo=2&leftNum=15"

    34 "http://www.index.go.kr/egams/stts/jsp/potal/stts/PO_STTS_IdxMain.jsp?i dx_cd=1712"

    35 "http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/Korean.pdf"

    36 "http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/10/11/americas_pacific_century"

    37 "http://www.defense.gov/specials/korea/usforces.html"

    38 "http://www.defense.gov/news/defense_strategic_guidance.pdf"

    39 "http://search.defense.gov/search?affiliate=DEFENSE_gov&query=US_R OK+allliance&x=0&y=0"

    40 Kegley, Charles W., "World Politics: Trend and Transformation" Macmillan Press 1999

    41 Handel, Micheal, "Weak States in the International System" Flank Cass and Company Limited 1981

    42 "United States Transforming Alliance with South Korea, Bush Says"

    43 Zumwalt, James P., "U.S.-Republic of Korea Alliance"

    44 Feith, Douglas J., "Transforming the U.S. Global Defense Posture"

    45 Waltz, Kenneth N., "Theory of International Politics" Addison-Wesley 1979

    46 Mearsheimer, John J., "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics" W.W.Norton & Compan 2001

    47 Snyder, Glenn H., "The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics" 36 (36): 461-495, 1984

    48 Kristof, Nicholas D., "The Rise of China" 72 (72): 59-74, 1993

    49 Campbell, Kurt M., "The Power of Balance: America in Asia" Center for a New American Security 2008

    50 Walt, Stephen M., "The Origins of Alliances" Cornell University Press 1987

    51 Michael Mandelbaum, "The Nuclear Revolution: International Politics Before and After Hiroshima" Cambridge University Press 1981

    52 Frankel, Joseph, "The Making of Foreign Policy: An Analysis of Decision Making" Oxford University Press 1963

    53 Vital, David, "The Inequality of State: A Study of the Small Power in International Relations" Oxford University Press 1971

    54 Lennon, Alexander T. J., "The Battle for Hearts and Minds: Using Soft Power to Undermine Terrorist Networks" MIT Press 2003

    55 Bull, Hedley, "The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics" Columbia University Press 1977

    56 Haass, Richard N., "The Age of Nonpolarity: What Will Follow U.S. Dominance" 87 (87): 44-56, 2008

    57 Glosserman, Brad, "Stressing the Linchpin: The US-ROK Alliance and ‘Rebalancing’ to Asia" 1-10, 2012

    58 U.S. Department of Defense, "Strategic Framework for the Asian Pacific Rim: Looking toward the 21st Century: The President’s Report on the U.S. Military Presence in East Asia (S. Hrg. 101-880)" U.S. Government Printing Office 1990

    59 Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, "Principles of International Politics: People’s Power, Preferences, and Perceptions" Congressional Quarterly Press 2000

    60 Mastanduno, Michael, "Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and US. Grand Strategy after the Cold Wa" 21 (21): 49-88, 1997

    61 Christensen, Thomas J., "Posing Problems without Catching- Up: China’s Rise and Challenges for U.S. Security Policy" 25 (25): 5-40, 2001

    62 Shoemaker, Christopher C., "Patron-Client State Relationships: Multilateral Crises in the Nuclear Age" Praeger 1984

    63 Eisenstadt, Shmuel N., "Patron-Client Relations as a Model of Structuring Social Exchange" 22 (22): 42-77, 1980

    64 "OPLAN 5027 Major Theater War–West"

    65 Holsti, Kalevi J., "International Politics: A Framework for Analysis" Prentice Hall 1988

    66 "Department of Defense Base Structure Report Fiscal Year 2013" Baseline

    67 "Department of Defense Base Structure Report Fiscal Year 2012" Baseline

    68 Feith, Douglas J., "Defense, Democracy and the War on Terrorism"

    69 Hale, David, "China takes off" 82 (82): 36-53, 2003

    70 Eisenman, Joshua, "China and the Developing World: Beijing’s Strategy for the Twenty-First Century" M.E. Sharpe 2009

    71 Schweller, Randall L., "Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In" 19 (19): 72-107, 1994

    72 Moon, Chung-in, "Balance of Influence vs. Balance of Power: An Eclectic Approach for East Asian Security, In Northeast Asian Regional Security Order and Strategic Calculus on the Taiwan Straits" Yonsei University Press 2003

    73 Olson, Mancur, "An Economic Theory of Alliances" 48 (48): 266-279, 1966

    74 Clinton, Hillary R., "America’s Pacific Century"

    75 Schroeder, Paul W., "Alliances, 1815-1945: Weapons of Power and Tools of Management, In Historical Dimensions of National Security Problems" University of Kansas Press 1976

    76 Morrow, James D., "Alliances and asymmetry: An alternative to the capability aggregation model of alliances" 35 (35): 904-933, 1991

    77 Snyder, Glenn H., "Alliance, Balance, and Stability" 45 (45): 121-142, 1991

    78 Walt, Stephen M., "Alliance in Theory and Practice: What lies Ahead?" 43 (43): 1-18, 1989

    79 Rothstein, Robert L., "Alliance and Small Power" Columbia University Press 1968

    80 Osgood, Robert E., "Alliance and American Foreign Policy" Johns Hopkins University. Press 1968

    81 Snyder, Glenn H., "Alliance Politics" Cornell University Press 1997

    82 Walt, Stephen M., "Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power" 9 (9): 3-43, 1985

    83 Sharp, Jane M. O., "After Reykjavik: arms control and the allies" 63 (63): 239-257, 1987

    84 Modelski, George, "A Theory of Foreign Policy" Pall Mall Press 1962

    85 Friedberg, Aaron L., "A Contest for Supremacy: China, America, and the Struggle for Mastery in Asia" W.W. Norton & Company 2011

    86 이각범, "21세기 한-미 관계의 재정립" 한국경제연구원 153-192, 2009

    87 한국무역협회-뉴욕지부, "2012년 對美 무역 동향"

    88 국방부, "2010 국방백서" 국방부 2010

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2014-01-14 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Peace Studies KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-05-28 학회명변경 한글명 : 평화연구소 -> 평화와 민주주의연구소
    영문명 : Institute for Peace Studies, Korea University -> Peace & Democracy Institute
    KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.82 0.82 0.72
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.69 0.74 1.224 0.27
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼