환경정의의 관점에서 본 환경책임법제에 대한 소고 = A Study on enactment of environmental liability in terms of environmental justice

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Today many countries are trying to establish ‘environmental liability act’ that can rectify environmental injustice and distribute environmental benefit fairly to each member while apportioning the loss evenly. Korea recognizes the necessity of ‘environmental liability act’ and is trying to legalize such act. An important issue in enacting ‘environmental liability act’ lies with the distribution of environmental damages and losses among its victims, polluters and society according to the responsibility of the respective parties. More specifically, it should be enacted in the light of four concepts of environmental justice: corrective justice, distributive justice, social justice and procedural justice. Thus to establish such ‘environmental liability act’ which corresponds to environmental justice, the concept of environmental damage should be clearly defined and the range of which is to be recovered or compensated should be decided. In constructing a legislative system related to environmental responsibility, the Act should adopt strict liability which considers victims as a vulnerable social group and is apt to redistribute risks. The Act should not only comprise a civil relief system as an ex-post measure but also a public relief system as a preventive control system in the relief of environmental damages. Since polluter`s liability has its limit, the Act should be supplemented by a funding or a environmental insurance system to pay for damages that cannot be compensated by the polluters. Finally, it should enact provisions for the claims to information or claims of information disclosure that can realize environmental justice in terms of procedural justice.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 손윤하, "환경침해와 민사소송" 청림출판 2005

2 류지태, "환경책임입법론" 20 : 1992

3 한상운, "환경책임과 환경피해보험의 제도화 방안에 관한 연구Ⅱ" 한국환경정책·평가연구원 2011

4 전경운, "환경정책기본법 제31조에 의한 무과실책임의 문제점과 개정방향 - 환경정책기본법의 개정안 제44조와 관련하여-" 한국환경법학회 31 (31): 319-347, 2009

5 전재경, "환경정의의 학제적 고찰-정부, 시장, 과학기술의 조화-" 한국법제연구원 2000

6 한면희, "환경정의의 이론과 실제" 21 : 1999

7 피터벤츠, "환경정의" 한울 2007

8 이태영, "환경오염피해에 대한 배상책임의 구조-고의, 과실과 위법성을 중심으로-" 23 : 2006

9 이기형, "환경오염리스크관리를 위한 보험제도 활용방안" 보험연구원 2008

10 정진영, "환경오염 피해에 대한 사법적 구제-위험책임의 입장에서-" 21 : 1999

11 이봉주, "환경오염 피해구제에 대한 환경정책과 환경오염배상책임보험" 1996

12 김홍균, "환경법" 홍문사 2012

13 박균성, "행정법원론(상)" 박영사 2012

14 한상운, "통합적 환경관리체계 구축을 위한 정책방안연구(Ⅱ)" 한국환경정책·평가연구원 2008

15 이은영, "채권각론" 박영사 1993

16 곽윤직, "채권각론" 박영사 1995

17 정하중, "배출부과금의 제도적 근거와 법적 개선 방향" 15 : 1993

18 김홍균, "미국 종합환경대응책임법상의 책임당사자와 토양환경보전법상의 오염원인자" 24 (24): 2002

19 이승우, "공해무과실책임법에 관한 고찰" 한국환경법학회 29 (29): 261-288, 2007

20 한귀현, "環境損害에 대한 責任法制― 유럽환경손해책임지침과 독일환경손해법안을 중심으로 ―" 한국공법학회 35 (35): 695-724, 2006

21 김홍균, "環境保險制度의 導入과 定着化를 위한 提言" 한국법학원 65 : 143-157, 2002

22 Clifford Rechtschaffen, "O’Neill, Environmental Justice Law, Policy & Regulation" Carolina Academic Press 2009

23 James Salzman, "Environmental Law and Policy" Foundation Press 2007

24 홍강훈, "(로스쿨) 객관식 행정법특강" 박영사 2012