RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      조나단 에드워즈의 노예제에 대한 시각 고찰, 1730-1780 = Jonathan Edwards’s Thoughts on Slavery, 1730-1780

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108872479

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Before the rise of antislavery ideology and political movements for abolition during the revolutionary period, a number of Anglo-American evangelicals expressed their antipathy toward slavery below the surface of proslavery discourse. Many researchers have treated this antipathy as a spontaneous feeling, but it was quite new phenomenon that ‘low level’ antislavery elements appeared more frequently in evangelical epistles, tracts and sermons and spread into the British Atlantic world through the transatlantic evangelical network in the mid-eighteenth century. This research treats this transformative process of the evangelical mind through the scrutiny of Jonathan Edwards’s thoughts on slavery, which has not been the subject of intense investigation.
      Edwards distinguished the slave trade from slavery and supported the justification of slavery while strongly opposing the former. He asserted that the institution would be justified only when African slaves were purchased legitimately and masters’ treatment coincided with Christian benevolence. However, the slave trade broke this premise and thus could not be supported to any extent. He exemplified his seemingly inconsistent idea as a rhetorical weapon against immediatism in one sense. However his assertion also reflected an intermediary stage between unquestioning acceptance of slavery and restriction on the institution.
      Edwards himself accepted slavery as a part of the established order and thus can be categorized as “proslavery”. However, his perception of conflict between benevolence and the nature of slavery spread through the transatlantic communication channel of evangelicals and presented the grounds for evangelical antislavery ideology in the late eighteenth century. In this sense, his thoughts on slavery and the slave trade still have historical importance.
      번역하기

      Before the rise of antislavery ideology and political movements for abolition during the revolutionary period, a number of Anglo-American evangelicals expressed their antipathy toward slavery below the surface of proslavery discourse. Many researchers...

      Before the rise of antislavery ideology and political movements for abolition during the revolutionary period, a number of Anglo-American evangelicals expressed their antipathy toward slavery below the surface of proslavery discourse. Many researchers have treated this antipathy as a spontaneous feeling, but it was quite new phenomenon that ‘low level’ antislavery elements appeared more frequently in evangelical epistles, tracts and sermons and spread into the British Atlantic world through the transatlantic evangelical network in the mid-eighteenth century. This research treats this transformative process of the evangelical mind through the scrutiny of Jonathan Edwards’s thoughts on slavery, which has not been the subject of intense investigation.
      Edwards distinguished the slave trade from slavery and supported the justification of slavery while strongly opposing the former. He asserted that the institution would be justified only when African slaves were purchased legitimately and masters’ treatment coincided with Christian benevolence. However, the slave trade broke this premise and thus could not be supported to any extent. He exemplified his seemingly inconsistent idea as a rhetorical weapon against immediatism in one sense. However his assertion also reflected an intermediary stage between unquestioning acceptance of slavery and restriction on the institution.
      Edwards himself accepted slavery as a part of the established order and thus can be categorized as “proslavery”. However, his perception of conflict between benevolence and the nature of slavery spread through the transatlantic communication channel of evangelicals and presented the grounds for evangelical antislavery ideology in the late eighteenth century. In this sense, his thoughts on slavery and the slave trade still have historical importance.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼