RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    正祖代 都城防禦論과 江華留守府

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to investigate the trend how the relationship between capital city and Ganghwa Island was shifted in terms of national security and defense during the war time in Joseon Dynasty. From Chinese Invasion in 1627 (year of Jeongmyo) through King Injo regime to King Hyojong and Hyunjong, national defense system was reinforced on the Ganghwa Island with exclusion of the capital city. However, as arguments on capital city defense were raised due to changes in internal and external environment and conditions after King Sookjong, the role and Ganghwa Island was to support capital city defense system from the outskirts of the nation and importance of the island became less weighted.
    During the King Youngjo and Jeongjo regimes, capital city defense system was the same with previous regimes in terms of that capital city defense was linked with the defense from the outskirts of the nation, however main differences were laid that the King Youngjo focused more on capital city defense and the King Jeongjo reinforced defense system at the suburb centered on Hwasung in Suwon. In the King Jeongjo regimes, there was a movement to keep the principle of critical defense of capital city and at the same time, Ganghwa Island could be used as a strategic military base. Debates on relocation of Tong-o military base into Ganghwa Island in order to reinforce military force around Ganghwa-Yusubu region was initiated by the King Jeongjo. Also negligent operation of military organization and waste of budget were found and solution was sought through rearrangement of military organization. However, when Hwasung were under construction, the main interest in capital city defense centered on capital city and Ganghwa Isalnd was shifted into Hwasung.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to investigate the trend how the relationship between capital city and Ganghwa Island was shifted in terms of national security and defense during the war time in Joseon Dynasty. From Chinese Invasion in 1627 (year of Jeon...

    The purpose of this study is to investigate the trend how the relationship between capital city and Ganghwa Island was shifted in terms of national security and defense during the war time in Joseon Dynasty. From Chinese Invasion in 1627 (year of Jeongmyo) through King Injo regime to King Hyojong and Hyunjong, national defense system was reinforced on the Ganghwa Island with exclusion of the capital city. However, as arguments on capital city defense were raised due to changes in internal and external environment and conditions after King Sookjong, the role and Ganghwa Island was to support capital city defense system from the outskirts of the nation and importance of the island became less weighted.
    During the King Youngjo and Jeongjo regimes, capital city defense system was the same with previous regimes in terms of that capital city defense was linked with the defense from the outskirts of the nation, however main differences were laid that the King Youngjo focused more on capital city defense and the King Jeongjo reinforced defense system at the suburb centered on Hwasung in Suwon. In the King Jeongjo regimes, there was a movement to keep the principle of critical defense of capital city and at the same time, Ganghwa Island could be used as a strategic military base. Debates on relocation of Tong-o military base into Ganghwa Island in order to reinforce military force around Ganghwa-Yusubu region was initiated by the King Jeongjo. Also negligent operation of military organization and waste of budget were found and solution was sought through rearrangement of military organization. However, when Hwasung were under construction, the main interest in capital city defense centered on capital city and Ganghwa Isalnd was shifted into Hwasung.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 정조대 도성방어체제와 강화유수부
    • Ⅲ. 정조 초 군영제 정비와 도성방어논의
    • Ⅳ. 맺음말
    • 참고문헌
    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 정조대 도성방어체제와 강화유수부
    • Ⅲ. 정조 초 군영제 정비와 도성방어논의
    • Ⅳ. 맺음말
    • 참고문헌
    • ABSTRACT
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이근호, "조선후기의 수도방위체제" 서울학연구소 1998

    2 손승철, "정조시대 『풍천유향』의 도성방위책" 서울시사편찬위원회 54 : 1994

    3 이재범, "송규빈의 생애와 그의 도성사수론" 서울시사편찬위원회 58 : 1998

    4 이홍두, "병자호란 전후 江都의 鎭堡 설치와 관방체계의 확립" 인천대학교 인천학연구소 9 : 2008

    5 송규빈, "風泉遺響"

    6 元永煥, "漢城府硏究(3); 都城과 首都防衛를 中心으로" 서울시사편찬위원회 (41) : 1983

    7 "朝鮮王朝實錄 (인조, 효종, 현종, 숙종, 경종, 영조, 정조)"

    8 오종록, "朝鮮後期 首都防衛體制에 대한 一考察; 五軍營의 三手兵制와 守 城戰" 고려대학교 33 : 1988

    9 "日省錄"

    10 "承政院日記"

    1 이근호, "조선후기의 수도방위체제" 서울학연구소 1998

    2 손승철, "정조시대 『풍천유향』의 도성방위책" 서울시사편찬위원회 54 : 1994

    3 이재범, "송규빈의 생애와 그의 도성사수론" 서울시사편찬위원회 58 : 1998

    4 이홍두, "병자호란 전후 江都의 鎭堡 설치와 관방체계의 확립" 인천대학교 인천학연구소 9 : 2008

    5 송규빈, "風泉遺響"

    6 元永煥, "漢城府硏究(3); 都城과 首都防衛를 中心으로" 서울시사편찬위원회 (41) : 1983

    7 "朝鮮王朝實錄 (인조, 효종, 현종, 숙종, 경종, 영조, 정조)"

    8 오종록, "朝鮮後期 首都防衛體制에 대한 一考察; 五軍營의 三手兵制와 守 城戰" 고려대학교 33 : 1988

    9 "日省錄"

    10 "承政院日記"

    11 "備邊司謄錄"

    12 이근호, "18세기 전반의 수도방위론" 국방부 군사편찬연구소 37 : 1998

    13 이민웅, "18세기 강화도 수비체제의 강화" 서울대학교 국사학과 34 : 1995

    14 조낙영, "17세기 강화도 비축곡의 마련과 운영" 서울대학교국사학과 51 : 2005

    15 송양섭, "17세기 江華島 방어체제의 확립과 鎭撫營의 창설" 고려사학회 13 : 10-, 2002

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2025 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2020-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2019-12-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
    2018-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-10-02 학술지명변경 한글명 : 서울학연구 -> 서울학연구 KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL () KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.63 0.63 0.68
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.61 0.62 1.483 0.14
    더보기
    해외이동버튼