RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    학문 목적 한국어 학습자의 어휘 습득 변인 연구: 이해어휘와 표현어휘 관계를 중심으로 = A Study on the Related Variables of Vocabulary Acquisition: Comparing Receptive and Productive Academic Vocabulary Knowdedge of Korean Learners for Academic Purposes

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104677426

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Vocabulary research has been done in numerous ways in the area of Korean language education. However, the related variables of vocabulary acquisition have never been searched for based on the second language theory. In particular, there has been a lack of focus on the gap between receptive and productive vocabulary. This study investigates the vocabulary size of Korean language learners to measure the difference between receptive and productive vocabulary. A total of 66 Korean language learners of academic purposes participated in the receptive and productive test of Korean vocabulary made by the researcher. Statistical analysis was done, which showed the mean for receptive vocabulary was 12.59 (out of 15) compared to just 9.41 for productive vocabulary. Two main variables-how long a participant has been learning Korean, and the achievement score from the participants’ Korean writing class--were entered into the correlation analysis. Receptive vocabulary correlated at r=.45, r=.36 respectively for the duration and achivement. However, productive vocabulary only correlated at r=.55 for the achievement score. The result of this study implies that the process of two kinds of vocabulary acquisition follows different routes. There appear to be other related variables in acquiring productive vocabulary which could have been researched. Therefore, a future study needs to find other related variables to enlighten the process of vocabulary acquisition.
    번역하기

    Vocabulary research has been done in numerous ways in the area of Korean language education. However, the related variables of vocabulary acquisition have never been searched for based on the second language theory. In particular, there has been a lac...

    Vocabulary research has been done in numerous ways in the area of Korean language education. However, the related variables of vocabulary acquisition have never been searched for based on the second language theory. In particular, there has been a lack of focus on the gap between receptive and productive vocabulary. This study investigates the vocabulary size of Korean language learners to measure the difference between receptive and productive vocabulary. A total of 66 Korean language learners of academic purposes participated in the receptive and productive test of Korean vocabulary made by the researcher. Statistical analysis was done, which showed the mean for receptive vocabulary was 12.59 (out of 15) compared to just 9.41 for productive vocabulary. Two main variables-how long a participant has been learning Korean, and the achievement score from the participants’ Korean writing class--were entered into the correlation analysis. Receptive vocabulary correlated at r=.45, r=.36 respectively for the duration and achivement. However, productive vocabulary only correlated at r=.55 for the achievement score. The result of this study implies that the process of two kinds of vocabulary acquisition follows different routes. There appear to be other related variables in acquiring productive vocabulary which could have been researched. Therefore, a future study needs to find other related variables to enlighten the process of vocabulary acquisition.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 원미진, "한국어 학습자의 어휘 학습 전략에 관한 연구" 한국사전학회 (15) : 194-219, 2010

    2 신명선, "의미, 텍스트, 교육" 문화사 2008

    3 Nagy, W. E, "Vocabulary process, In Handbook of reading research volume III" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 269-284, 2000

    4 Dale, E, "Vocabulary measurement: Techniques and major findings" 42 : 895-901, 1965

    5 Paribakht, T, "The relationship between reading comprehension and second language development in a comprehension-based ESL program" 11 (11): 9-29, 1993

    6 Stahl, S. A., "The effects of vocabulary instruction : a model-based meta-analysis" 56 : 72-110, 1986

    7 Nation, I. S. P, "Testing and teaching vocabulary, In Guideline 5" 12-25, 1983

    8 Nation, I. S. P, "Teaching and learning vocabulary" Heinle &Heinle 1990

    9 Huckin, T, "Strategies for inferring word-meanings in context; A cognitive model, In Second language and reading and vocabulary learning" Ablex 153-178, 1993

    10 Melka, "Receptive vs. productive aspect of vocabulary, In Vocabulary : description, acquisition and pedagogy" 1997

    1 원미진, "한국어 학습자의 어휘 학습 전략에 관한 연구" 한국사전학회 (15) : 194-219, 2010

    2 신명선, "의미, 텍스트, 교육" 문화사 2008

    3 Nagy, W. E, "Vocabulary process, In Handbook of reading research volume III" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 269-284, 2000

    4 Dale, E, "Vocabulary measurement: Techniques and major findings" 42 : 895-901, 1965

    5 Paribakht, T, "The relationship between reading comprehension and second language development in a comprehension-based ESL program" 11 (11): 9-29, 1993

    6 Stahl, S. A., "The effects of vocabulary instruction : a model-based meta-analysis" 56 : 72-110, 1986

    7 Nation, I. S. P, "Testing and teaching vocabulary, In Guideline 5" 12-25, 1983

    8 Nation, I. S. P, "Teaching and learning vocabulary" Heinle &Heinle 1990

    9 Huckin, T, "Strategies for inferring word-meanings in context; A cognitive model, In Second language and reading and vocabulary learning" Ablex 153-178, 1993

    10 Melka, "Receptive vs. productive aspect of vocabulary, In Vocabulary : description, acquisition and pedagogy" 1997

    11 Nation, I. S. P, "Learning vocabulary in another language" Cambridge University Press 2001

    12 Quin, D. D, "Investigation the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective" 52 (52): 513-536, 2002

    13 Stahl, S. A, "Differential knowledge and reading comprehension" 15 : 33-50, 1983

    14 Schmitt, N, "Developing and exploring the behavior of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test" 18 (18): 55-88, 2001

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.95 0.95 0.9
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.9 0.85 1.159 0.41
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼