프레이리와 랑시에르의 해방교육론 비교 = A comparison Freire and Ranciere on the emancipation education

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

A purposes of this study is to comparatively analysis Freire`s emancipation education theory and Ranciere`s one. The results of study are as follows. 1. the common views which two theories share First, Educational activities are value laden because they are involved with political activities. Second, Teacher`s explanation centered teaching, named ``banking concept of education`` or ``making fool education`` is a bad teaching which is against human nature, and makes student a fool and the oppressed. It cause community to irrational and unequal one. Third, emancipation is not a work on social class but a job on recovering the human nature, so the emancipation have to be done by education. Forth, the practical strategies of emancipation education that two emancipation education theorists suggest were based on the educational experiences and the educational achievements 2. the different views that two theories have, and what the differences came from are as follows. First, Freire`s emancipation education, called ``problem posing education``, focuses on the dialogue between teacher and students on the ordinary living with that the students daily face, whereas Ranci?re`s emancipation education, called ignorant teacher`s education, focused a on interaction student and their text books. Second, In Freire`s emancipation education, the separation between teacher and student come to vanishes, and teacher and student become co-worker, whereas in Ranci?re`s emancipation education, separation between teacher and student is sticked, authority of teacher is kept on. Third, Freire`s education give weight to make the society without oppression, whereas Ranciere`s education give weight to expend personal intellectual freedom. Forth, The differences between Freire`s education and Ranci?re`one come from differences of time and place that two scholars live in and experience, and differences of academic atmosphere that they were exposed.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 홍은광, "희망의 교육을 향한 해방의 삶" 14 : 242-270, 2003

2 Freire, Paulo, "페다고지" 한국천주교평신도사제협의회 1979

3 김부태, "파울루 프레이리의 신자유주의 교육 비판론 고찰" 한국교육개발원 34 (34): 3-26, 2007

4 심성보, "왜 지금 다시 페다고지를 다시 읽어야 하는가?" (7) : 273-288, 2001

5 목영해, "바람 든 한국교육" 문음사 2009

6 양창렬, "무지한 스승" 궁리 2008

7 Ranciere, Jacques, "무지한 스승" 궁리 2008

8 목영해, "랑시에르의 교육관이 학력양극화 해결에 주는 시사점" 한국교육사상연구회 26 (26): 91-112, 2012

9 Freire, Paulo, "교육과 의식화" 새밭 1979

10 Galloway, Sarah, "Reconsidering Emancipatory Education : Staging a Conversation between Paulo Freier and Jacques Ranciere" 62 (62): 39-59, 2012

11 Hallward, Peter, "Politics and Aesthetics : an Interview" 8 (8): 191-193, 2003

12 Roberts, Peter, "Pedagogy, Neoliberalism and Postmoderinity: Reflections on Freier's Later Work" 35 (35): 451-465, 2003

13 Arsenjuk, Luka, "On Jacques Ranciere"

14 Bingham, Charles, "Jacques Ranciere: Education, Truth, Emancipation" Continuum 2010

15 Pelletier, Caroline, "Emancipation, Equality and Education : Ranciere's Critique of Bourdieu and the Question of Performativity" 30 (30): 137-150, 2009

16 "CNMTL"

17 Biesta, Gert, "A new logic of emancipation : the methodology of Jacques Ranciere" 60 (60): 163-184, 2010