RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    고등학생과 역사가의 역사 텍스트 독해 양상과 텍스트 독해 교수학습 전략 = High School Students’ Reading of Historical Texts and Strategies for Using Historical Texts in the History Class

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99699210

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper analyzes how Korean 10th graders read historical texts and suggests several teaching strategies for using historical texts in the class. For this study, I selected three historical texts which have been repeatedly used in elementary, middle and high school Korean history textbooks because I intended to anlayze how students read familiar historical texts. Text 1 is the King Sejeong’s Preface of Hun Min Jeong Um(1443), in which the King Sejong wrote why he created the Korean written language, Hun Min Jeong Um, Text2 is several Chosen scholars’ letter to the King Sejeong. in which the scholars strongly insisted that Hum Min Jeong Um not be used. Text 3 is a short and edited record of Sejeong and the scholars’ conversation.
    I asked twenty two 10th graders in Seoul and the Gyeongi province to read those texts and answer to my questions: why they insisted that Hum Nin Jeong Um should be used or not be used. I recorded and transcribed the students’ answers for analysis and comparison.
    As a result, I have found that Korean 10th graders’ previous knowledge and prejudice on the writers strongly influence their interpretation of historical texts and their ways of making inference of the writers(speakers)’ intention from the texts. I suggest that when teachers give and ask students to read historical texts, they need to guide students not to infuse any prejudice into the texts.
    번역하기

    This paper analyzes how Korean 10th graders read historical texts and suggests several teaching strategies for using historical texts in the class. For this study, I selected three historical texts which have been repeatedly used in elementary, middle...

    This paper analyzes how Korean 10th graders read historical texts and suggests several teaching strategies for using historical texts in the class. For this study, I selected three historical texts which have been repeatedly used in elementary, middle and high school Korean history textbooks because I intended to anlayze how students read familiar historical texts. Text 1 is the King Sejeong’s Preface of Hun Min Jeong Um(1443), in which the King Sejong wrote why he created the Korean written language, Hun Min Jeong Um, Text2 is several Chosen scholars’ letter to the King Sejeong. in which the scholars strongly insisted that Hum Min Jeong Um not be used. Text 3 is a short and edited record of Sejeong and the scholars’ conversation.
    I asked twenty two 10th graders in Seoul and the Gyeongi province to read those texts and answer to my questions: why they insisted that Hum Nin Jeong Um should be used or not be used. I recorded and transcribed the students’ answers for analysis and comparison.
    As a result, I have found that Korean 10th graders’ previous knowledge and prejudice on the writers strongly influence their interpretation of historical texts and their ways of making inference of the writers(speakers)’ intention from the texts. I suggest that when teachers give and ask students to read historical texts, they need to guide students not to infuse any prejudice into the texts.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 머리말
    • 2. 연구 내용 및 방법
    • 3. 10학년생과 역사가의 역사 텍스트 독해 양상
    • 4. 역사 텍스트 독해 교수ㆍ학습을 위한 전략
    • 5. 맺음말
    • 1. 머리말
    • 2. 연구 내용 및 방법
    • 3. 10학년생과 역사가의 역사 텍스트 독해 양상
    • 4. 역사 텍스트 독해 교수ㆍ학습을 위한 전략
    • 5. 맺음말
    • 참고문헌
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 강선주, "중학생의 사료이해 유형 분석과 사료학습에 대한 시사" 서울大學校 大學院 1994

    2 송춘영, "역사적 사고력을 기르기 위한 사료 활용 방안, In 역사교육의 이론과 방법" 삼지원 1997

    3 퀸턴 스키너, "역사를 읽는 방법 : 텍스트를 어떻게 읽고 해석할 것인가" 돌베개 2012

    4 한상준, "역사교육에 있어서의 사료학습의 접근 방안, In 그 이론적 기초연구를 중심으로" 22 : 1980

    5 최상훈, "고등학생의 사료이해 양상" 한국역사교육학회 (3) : 145-208, 2006

    6 B. A. Vansledright, "What does It Man to Think Historically and How do You Teach It?" 68 (68): 2004

    7 P. J. Lee, "Understanding and Research, In History Teaching and Historical Understanding" Heinemann Education Books Ltd. 1978

    8 G. Leinhardt, "Two Texts, Three Readers: Distance and Expertise in Reading History" 14 (14): 1996

    9 S. S. Wineburg, "The Cognitive Representation of Historical Texts, In Teaching and Learning in History" Lawrence Erlbaum Assoicates, Inc. 1994

    10 R Ashby, "Students’ Approaches to Validating Historical Claims, In Understanding History: Recent Research in History Education Vol 4. International Review of History Education" Routledge 2005

    1 강선주, "중학생의 사료이해 유형 분석과 사료학습에 대한 시사" 서울大學校 大學院 1994

    2 송춘영, "역사적 사고력을 기르기 위한 사료 활용 방안, In 역사교육의 이론과 방법" 삼지원 1997

    3 퀸턴 스키너, "역사를 읽는 방법 : 텍스트를 어떻게 읽고 해석할 것인가" 돌베개 2012

    4 한상준, "역사교육에 있어서의 사료학습의 접근 방안, In 그 이론적 기초연구를 중심으로" 22 : 1980

    5 최상훈, "고등학생의 사료이해 양상" 한국역사교육학회 (3) : 145-208, 2006

    6 B. A. Vansledright, "What does It Man to Think Historically and How do You Teach It?" 68 (68): 2004

    7 P. J. Lee, "Understanding and Research, In History Teaching and Historical Understanding" Heinemann Education Books Ltd. 1978

    8 G. Leinhardt, "Two Texts, Three Readers: Distance and Expertise in Reading History" 14 (14): 1996

    9 S. S. Wineburg, "The Cognitive Representation of Historical Texts, In Teaching and Learning in History" Lawrence Erlbaum Assoicates, Inc. 1994

    10 R Ashby, "Students’ Approaches to Validating Historical Claims, In Understanding History: Recent Research in History Education Vol 4. International Review of History Education" Routledge 2005

    11 P. Lee, "Progression in Historical Understanding among Students 7-14, In Knowing, Teaching & Learning History" New york University Press 2000

    12 K. C. Barton, "I Just Kinda Know: Elementary Students’ Ideas about Historical Evidence" 25 : 1997

    13 S. S. Wineburg, "Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts" Temple University Press 2001

    14 S. S. Wineburg, "Historical Problem-Solving : A Study of Cognitive Processes used in the Evaluation of Documentaty Evidence" Stanford University 1990

    15 P. Afflerbach, "Hath! Doth! What? Middle Graders Reading Innovative History Text" 44 : 2002

    16 R. Ashby, "Developing a Concept of Historical Evidence: Students’ Ideas about Testing Singular Factual Claims" 4 (4): 2004

    17 E. Yeager, "Between Campus and Classroom: Secondary Student- Teacher’s Thinking about Historical Texts" 29 (29): 1995

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1 1 0.94
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.94 0.96 1.598 0.59
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼