RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    통계적 기법을 이용한 집단 협업 프로젝트에서의 공정한 동료 평가 방법론에 대한 연구 = Equitable Peer Assessment Method in Collaboration Project Using Statistical Technique

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103753272

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    For evaluating participation in collaboration project, the peer assement method is mostly used and various scoring methods have been proposed. But, the reliability and validity of the peer assessment method are still doubted for all most method. In order to overcome these weaknesss, some guidelines and training methods have been recommended. In this article, however,statistical technique is proposed for measuring individual contributions to collaboration projects considering each assessor’s reliability. The gist of our proposed algorithm is that an assessor’s reliability depends on the evaluation policy, and this reliability is evaluated by an analysis of variance of the scores assigned by the assessor. We also show that the proposed method is very efficient by case study in university class.
    번역하기

    For evaluating participation in collaboration project, the peer assement method is mostly used and various scoring methods have been proposed. But, the reliability and validity of the peer assessment method are still doubted for all most method. In or...

    For evaluating participation in collaboration project, the peer assement method is mostly used and various scoring methods have been proposed. But, the reliability and validity of the peer assessment method are still doubted for all most method. In order to overcome these weaknesss, some guidelines and training methods have been recommended. In this article, however,statistical technique is proposed for measuring individual contributions to collaboration projects considering each assessor’s reliability. The gist of our proposed algorithm is that an assessor’s reliability depends on the evaluation policy, and this reliability is evaluated by an analysis of variance of the scores assigned by the assessor. We also show that the proposed method is very efficient by case study in university class.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 고성석, "온라인 협업 시스템의 품질관리 체계에 대한 연구" 한국산업경영시스템학회 33 (33): 127-132, 2010

    2 Michaelsen, L. K., "Team learning : a comprehensive approach for harnessing the power of small groups in higher education" 11 : 107-122, 1994

    3 Raban, R., "Supporting peer assessment of individual contributions in groupwork, Proc" 685-694, 2007

    4 Panchal, J., "Product Realization in The Age of Mass Collaboration, Proc" 3-6, 2008

    5 Freeman, M., "Peer assessment by groups of group work" 20 : 289-299, 1995

    6 Herbet, N., "Peer assessment : Is it fair?" 2006

    7 Topping, K.J., "Peer Assessment"

    8 Parsons, D., "Justice in the Classroom : Peer Assessment of Contributions in Group Projects, Proc" 145-151, 2004

    9 Marjo van Zundert, "Effective peer assessment processes : Research findings and future directions" 20 : 270-279, 2009

    10 Gehringer, E. F., "Assessing Studentsʼ Wiki Contributions" 2008

    1 고성석, "온라인 협업 시스템의 품질관리 체계에 대한 연구" 한국산업경영시스템학회 33 (33): 127-132, 2010

    2 Michaelsen, L. K., "Team learning : a comprehensive approach for harnessing the power of small groups in higher education" 11 : 107-122, 1994

    3 Raban, R., "Supporting peer assessment of individual contributions in groupwork, Proc" 685-694, 2007

    4 Panchal, J., "Product Realization in The Age of Mass Collaboration, Proc" 3-6, 2008

    5 Freeman, M., "Peer assessment by groups of group work" 20 : 289-299, 1995

    6 Herbet, N., "Peer assessment : Is it fair?" 2006

    7 Topping, K.J., "Peer Assessment"

    8 Parsons, D., "Justice in the Classroom : Peer Assessment of Contributions in Group Projects, Proc" 145-151, 2004

    9 Marjo van Zundert, "Effective peer assessment processes : Research findings and future directions" 20 : 270-279, 2009

    10 Gehringer, E. F., "Assessing Studentsʼ Wiki Contributions" 2008

    11 Kennedy, J.G., "-assessment in Group Projects : Is It Worth It?" 42 : 2005

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-11-29 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> KOREAN SOCIETY OF INDUSTRIAL AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING KCI등재
    2021-11-25 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering -> Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering KCI등재
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-12-04 학술지명변경 한글명 : 산업경영시스템학회지 -> 한국산업경영시스템학회지
    외국어명 : Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering -> Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering
    KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.34 0.34 0.3
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.28 0.28 0.37 0.16
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼