RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    팀 프로젝트 무임승차 방지 방안에 관한 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101700211

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Teams are used often in the workplace and in educational institute. Despite the advantages of students teams, the two most common problems are social loafing and free riding. I suggest that 'You are fired' method can be used successfully in students team project, especially in our cultural mood. The 'You are fired' method is very simple to execute into business classes using team assignments. Students can fire team members who will not do the necessary work or will not attend meetings with a simple two-step processes. To fire a student of the team must send an e-mail listing specific work that he or she is not doing and/ or meetings he or she is not attending. And a copy of the e-mail must be sent to the faculty member. If the free-rider fails to accomplish the required work, then a second e-mail is sent notifying the student that he or she is fired along with a copy to the faculty member. Data from 257 undergraduate students are analyzed for usefulness of 'You are fired' method. Students are highly supportive of all components parts of the 'You are fired' method. They strongly support the effectiveness of this method to prevent free riding on performing team projects.
    번역하기

    Teams are used often in the workplace and in educational institute. Despite the advantages of students teams, the two most common problems are social loafing and free riding. I suggest that 'You are fired' method can be used successfully in students t...

    Teams are used often in the workplace and in educational institute. Despite the advantages of students teams, the two most common problems are social loafing and free riding. I suggest that 'You are fired' method can be used successfully in students team project, especially in our cultural mood. The 'You are fired' method is very simple to execute into business classes using team assignments. Students can fire team members who will not do the necessary work or will not attend meetings with a simple two-step processes. To fire a student of the team must send an e-mail listing specific work that he or she is not doing and/ or meetings he or she is not attending. And a copy of the e-mail must be sent to the faculty member. If the free-rider fails to accomplish the required work, then a second e-mail is sent notifying the student that he or she is fired along with a copy to the faculty member. Data from 257 undergraduate students are analyzed for usefulness of 'You are fired' method. Students are highly supportive of all components parts of the 'You are fired' method. They strongly support the effectiveness of this method to prevent free riding on performing team projects.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Abernethy, M. A, "You Are Fired! A Method to Control and Sanction Free Riding in Group Assignments" 15 (15): 47-54, 2005

    2 Beatty, J. R., "Using Peer Evaluations to Assess Individual Performances in Group Class Projects" 18 (18): 17-27, 1996

    3 Hass, A. L., "The Use of Self-Ratings and Peer Ratings to Evaluate Performances of Student Group Members" 20 (20): 200-209, 1998

    4 Williams, D. L., "Team Projects: Achieving Their Full Potential" 13 (13): 45-53, 1991

    5 Chen, Y., "Students' Perceptions of Peer Evaluation : An Expectancy Perspective" 79 (79): 275-282, 2004

    6 Brooks, C. M, "Free Riding in Group Projects and the Effects of Timing, Frequency, and Specificity of Criteria in Peer Assessments" 78 (78): 268-272, 2003

    7 Tyagi, P. K., "Expectancy Theory and Social Loafing in Marketing Research Group Projects" 14 (14): 22-27, 2010

    8 Batra, M. M., "Effective Pedagogy for Student Team Projects" 19 (19): 42-, 1997

    9 Mefoh, P. C., "Effect of Group Size and Expectancy of Reward on Social Loafing" 20 (20): 229-240, 2012

    10 Pfaff, E., "Does It Matter If I Hate Teamwork? What impacts Student Attitudes Toward Team Work" 25 (25): 37-45, 2003

    1 Abernethy, M. A, "You Are Fired! A Method to Control and Sanction Free Riding in Group Assignments" 15 (15): 47-54, 2005

    2 Beatty, J. R., "Using Peer Evaluations to Assess Individual Performances in Group Class Projects" 18 (18): 17-27, 1996

    3 Hass, A. L., "The Use of Self-Ratings and Peer Ratings to Evaluate Performances of Student Group Members" 20 (20): 200-209, 1998

    4 Williams, D. L., "Team Projects: Achieving Their Full Potential" 13 (13): 45-53, 1991

    5 Chen, Y., "Students' Perceptions of Peer Evaluation : An Expectancy Perspective" 79 (79): 275-282, 2004

    6 Brooks, C. M, "Free Riding in Group Projects and the Effects of Timing, Frequency, and Specificity of Criteria in Peer Assessments" 78 (78): 268-272, 2003

    7 Tyagi, P. K., "Expectancy Theory and Social Loafing in Marketing Research Group Projects" 14 (14): 22-27, 2010

    8 Batra, M. M., "Effective Pedagogy for Student Team Projects" 19 (19): 42-, 1997

    9 Mefoh, P. C., "Effect of Group Size and Expectancy of Reward on Social Loafing" 20 (20): 229-240, 2012

    10 Pfaff, E., "Does It Matter If I Hate Teamwork? What impacts Student Attitudes Toward Team Work" 25 (25): 37-45, 2003

    11 Freeman, K. A, "Attitudes Toward Work in Project Groups as Predictors of Academic Performance" 27 (27): 265-282, 1996

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.44 0.44 0.44
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.43 0.38 0.58 0.15
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼