RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    사회과 주요 개념에 대한 역사적 고찰 -쿨리의 1차 집단을 중심으로 = A Historical Account of a Major Concept in Social Studies: Focusing on Cooley`s Concept of Primary Group

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99559619

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study is aimed to illuminate the nature of the primary group as a central mechanism by which individual and society are related, and to examine how it is reflected in the Korean social studies textbooks. For that purpose, this study not only attempts to trace out Cooley`s conception of the primary group and its conceptual changes made by other sociologists, but takes the Korean social studies textbooks as an object of analysis. In the concept of the primary group, Cooley`s interest has been not in classifying social groups, but in the process of rebirth of an individual into social being and of forming of social group. He emphasizes that the socializing function of the primary group can be done through the formation of we-ness. Thus, the central property of the primary group should be related to the establishment of we-ness. Neither has he have interests in the nature of other social groups in contrast to that of the primary group, nor used the term of the secondary group. However, most of the Korean social studies textbooks treat the primary group as if it would be crucial to distinguish between primary and secondary groups in terms of the pattern of contact, without dealing with the former group`s essential nature and decisive property. Unfortunately, such conception of the primary group as suggested by Cooley tends to disappear in those textbooks. If any, it is shown in a distorted way. It is necessary to revise the curriculum and textbook on that concept in order to avoid such misconceptions.
    번역하기

    This study is aimed to illuminate the nature of the primary group as a central mechanism by which individual and society are related, and to examine how it is reflected in the Korean social studies textbooks. For that purpose, this study not only atte...

    This study is aimed to illuminate the nature of the primary group as a central mechanism by which individual and society are related, and to examine how it is reflected in the Korean social studies textbooks. For that purpose, this study not only attempts to trace out Cooley`s conception of the primary group and its conceptual changes made by other sociologists, but takes the Korean social studies textbooks as an object of analysis. In the concept of the primary group, Cooley`s interest has been not in classifying social groups, but in the process of rebirth of an individual into social being and of forming of social group. He emphasizes that the socializing function of the primary group can be done through the formation of we-ness. Thus, the central property of the primary group should be related to the establishment of we-ness. Neither has he have interests in the nature of other social groups in contrast to that of the primary group, nor used the term of the secondary group. However, most of the Korean social studies textbooks treat the primary group as if it would be crucial to distinguish between primary and secondary groups in terms of the pattern of contact, without dealing with the former group`s essential nature and decisive property. Unfortunately, such conception of the primary group as suggested by Cooley tends to disappear in those textbooks. If any, it is shown in a distorted way. It is necessary to revise the curriculum and textbook on that concept in order to avoid such misconceptions.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 우리사회문화학회, "알기쉬운 사회학" 정림사 2001

    2 Turner, J, "사회학이론의 형성" 일신사 1997

    3 권태환, "사회학의 이해" 다산출판사 2009

    4 한국사회역사학회, "사회학: 열린 사회를 위한 이론적 모색" 학문과사상사 2000

    5 정태석, "사회학 : 비판적 사회읽기" 한울출판사 2012

    6 구정화, "사회과 개념학습의 연구 동향 및 함의" 19 (19): 291-308, 1994

    7 차조일, "사회과 개념수업모형의 이론적 문제점과 해결방안 : 개념수업을 위한일반모형의 개발을 중심으로" 29 (29): 227-249, 1999

    8 문교부, "사회Ⅰ" 대한교과서 1984

    9 한상진, "사회․문화" 천재교육 1996

    10 홍두승, "사회․문화" 동아출판사 1996

    1 우리사회문화학회, "알기쉬운 사회학" 정림사 2001

    2 Turner, J, "사회학이론의 형성" 일신사 1997

    3 권태환, "사회학의 이해" 다산출판사 2009

    4 한국사회역사학회, "사회학: 열린 사회를 위한 이론적 모색" 학문과사상사 2000

    5 정태석, "사회학 : 비판적 사회읽기" 한울출판사 2012

    6 구정화, "사회과 개념학습의 연구 동향 및 함의" 19 (19): 291-308, 1994

    7 차조일, "사회과 개념수업모형의 이론적 문제점과 해결방안 : 개념수업을 위한일반모형의 개발을 중심으로" 29 (29): 227-249, 1999

    8 문교부, "사회Ⅰ" 대한교과서 1984

    9 한상진, "사회․문화" 천재교육 1996

    10 홍두승, "사회․문화" 동아출판사 1996

    11 최현섭, "사회․문화" 중앙교육연구진흥소 2003

    12 차경수, "사회․문화" 지학사 1996

    13 박선웅, "사회․문화" 금성출판사 2012

    14 문교부, "사회․문화" 대한교과서 1991

    15 도종수, "사회․문화" 법문사 2003

    16 노경주, "사회․문화" 천재교육 2003

    17 김태헌, "사회․문화" 금성출판사 2003

    18 김영순, "사회․문화" 교학사 2012

    19 김병무, "사회․문화" 대한교과서 2003

    20 김병무, "사회․문화" 대한교과서 1996

    21 김경동, "사회․문화" 법문사 1996

    22 권태환, "사회․문화" 교학사 1996

    23 구정화, "사회․문화" 천재교육 2012

    24 Ross, D., "미국 사회과학의 기원" 나남 2008

    25 김선웅, "개념 중심의 사회학" 한울아카데미 2006

    26 Thomas, E., "group, primary, In Dictionary of Sociology" Philosophical Library 135-, 1944

    27 Bain, R., "The most important sociologists?" 27 (27): 746-748, 1962

    28 Oromaner, M, "The most cited sociologists: An analysis of introductory text citations" 3 (3): 124-126, 1968

    29 Faris, E, "The Primary Group: Essence and Accident" 38 (38): 41-50, 1932

    30 Bates, A., "The Primary Group: A Reappraisal" 2 (2): 181-191, 1961

    31 Wiese, L, "Systematic sociology on the basis of the Beziehungslehre and Gebildelehre of Leopold von Wiese" John Wiley & Sons, Inc 1932

    32 Broom, L., "Sociology : a text with adapted readings" Harper & Row 1977

    33 McNall, S, "Sociology" Prentice Hall 1992

    34 Cooley, C, "Sociological Theory and Social Research: Being Selected Papers of Charles Horton Cooley" Henry Holt and Company 1930

    35 Cooley, C., "Social Organization: A Study of the Larger Mind" C. Scribner's 1909

    36 Cooley, C., "Life and the Student: Roadside Notes on Human Nature, Society and Letters" Alfred A. Knopf 1927

    37 Cooley, C., "Human Nature and Social Order" Scribner's 1902

    38 Reitzes, D., "Cooley revisited: The treatment of Cooley's sociological orientation in introductory textbooks, Sociological Spectrum" 2 (2): 133-156, 1982

    39 Jandy, E., "Charles Horton Cooley, his life and his social theory" Octagon 1942

    40 Hinkle, R, "Charles Horton Cooley's General Sociological Orientation" 8 (8): 5-20, 1967

    41 Small, A., "An introduction to the study of society" American Book Co 1894

    42 Vine, M., "An introduction to sociological theory" David McKay Company 1962

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-06-28 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korea Association of Social Education KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.5 1.5 1.5
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.4 1.35 1.812 0.28
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼