RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    해방기의 전통주의 시론 연구 = 청문협을 중심으로

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99546204

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This research was conducted on traditionalism poetics and its aspect in the liberation period (1945-50). Chungmunhyup (the young literary men’s association of the right wings) very interested in the problem of traditionalism poetics in addition to a debate about pure poetry with the left wing. Especially, in case of poetry, Chungmunhyup researched native language and ‘the typical things of Joseon.’
    Yun Gon-gang who was independent from Chungmunhyup, started the first discussions about tradition’s value in the liberation period. Yun Gon-gang was the first person to distinguish between traditions and old customs. In particular, he had a lot of interest in the recovery of Korean native language. Also, he discussed the problem of traditional native language through Sijo (時調). He suggested the classic Sijo of Yun Seon-do as an example of past tradition which should be handed down, and suggested the modern Sijo of Jo Un as an example of the creation of a new tradition.
    Chungmunhyup’s writers also tried to promote the value of native language and showed extraordinary attention to the traditional literature of Joseon like Yun Gon-gang’s poetics. But they pointed out the abuse of dead language in Yun Gon-gang’s poetical works “Flute”. They exceeded the limits of Yun Gon-gang who modestly understood the problems of tradition in aspects of poetic words. As an example, Jo Yeon-hyeon argued that not only the succession of forms but also the succession of contents in classics. He recognized that classics are not the past things that need to be imitated but the current era’s assignment which need to be created in the future. Such assignment of ‘modernization of the classics’ appeared in common in the poetics of Kim Dong-lee, Jo Ji-hun, Seo Jeong-ju, etc. Chungmunhyup’s writers emphasized aesthetic transformations which reinterpret the material, rhythm, emotion of traditional poetry by modern artistic style. They approached from the point of view of interaction between old things of Joseon and modern things.
    Chungmunhyup’s writers had a consensus about their native language and the value of Joseon tradition, but, internally, they had different opinions about problems relating to ‘oriental tradition’. Jo Ji-hun created discourses on ‘Orient-the spiritual culture-lyric poetry’ as opposed to ‘Western-material civilization-non lyric poetry’. Kim Dong-lee emphasized the poetic tradition of the orient without having interest in the Joseon tradition. They had ethical confidence without compromising with the Greater East Asia logic in the late of Japanese colonization era (of Korea). So they put forward oriental poetry’s tradition without hesitation in the liberation period. In contrast, Seo Jeong-ju in the liberation period criticized or ignored the value of oriental poetry while emphasizing the tradition of Joseon poetry. Like this, Oriental discourses of the liberation period cannot be free from problems of past colonization.
    번역하기

    This research was conducted on traditionalism poetics and its aspect in the liberation period (1945-50). Chungmunhyup (the young literary men’s association of the right wings) very interested in the problem of traditionalism poetics in addition to a...

    This research was conducted on traditionalism poetics and its aspect in the liberation period (1945-50). Chungmunhyup (the young literary men’s association of the right wings) very interested in the problem of traditionalism poetics in addition to a debate about pure poetry with the left wing. Especially, in case of poetry, Chungmunhyup researched native language and ‘the typical things of Joseon.’
    Yun Gon-gang who was independent from Chungmunhyup, started the first discussions about tradition’s value in the liberation period. Yun Gon-gang was the first person to distinguish between traditions and old customs. In particular, he had a lot of interest in the recovery of Korean native language. Also, he discussed the problem of traditional native language through Sijo (時調). He suggested the classic Sijo of Yun Seon-do as an example of past tradition which should be handed down, and suggested the modern Sijo of Jo Un as an example of the creation of a new tradition.
    Chungmunhyup’s writers also tried to promote the value of native language and showed extraordinary attention to the traditional literature of Joseon like Yun Gon-gang’s poetics. But they pointed out the abuse of dead language in Yun Gon-gang’s poetical works “Flute”. They exceeded the limits of Yun Gon-gang who modestly understood the problems of tradition in aspects of poetic words. As an example, Jo Yeon-hyeon argued that not only the succession of forms but also the succession of contents in classics. He recognized that classics are not the past things that need to be imitated but the current era’s assignment which need to be created in the future. Such assignment of ‘modernization of the classics’ appeared in common in the poetics of Kim Dong-lee, Jo Ji-hun, Seo Jeong-ju, etc. Chungmunhyup’s writers emphasized aesthetic transformations which reinterpret the material, rhythm, emotion of traditional poetry by modern artistic style. They approached from the point of view of interaction between old things of Joseon and modern things.
    Chungmunhyup’s writers had a consensus about their native language and the value of Joseon tradition, but, internally, they had different opinions about problems relating to ‘oriental tradition’. Jo Ji-hun created discourses on ‘Orient-the spiritual culture-lyric poetry’ as opposed to ‘Western-material civilization-non lyric poetry’. Kim Dong-lee emphasized the poetic tradition of the orient without having interest in the Joseon tradition. They had ethical confidence without compromising with the Greater East Asia logic in the late of Japanese colonization era (of Korea). So they put forward oriental poetry’s tradition without hesitation in the liberation period. In contrast, Seo Jeong-ju in the liberation period criticized or ignored the value of oriental poetry while emphasizing the tradition of Joseon poetry. Like this, Oriental discourses of the liberation period cannot be free from problems of past colonization.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 혁신적 전통론과 시조 탐구:윤곤강
    • 3. 윤곤강 비판과 고전의 현대화:청문협
    • 4. 동양적인 것의 담론화와 내부적 편차
    • 5. 결론
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 혁신적 전통론과 시조 탐구:윤곤강
    • 3. 윤곤강 비판과 고전의 현대화:청문협
    • 4. 동양적인 것의 담론화와 내부적 편차
    • 5. 결론
    • 참고문헌
    • [Abstract]
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "현대문학"

    2 권영민, "해방직후의 민족문학운동 연구" 서울대학교출판부 110-115, 1986

    3 박용찬, "해방기의 시조 담론과 시조문학교재의 양상" 한국시조학회 (29) : 255-286, 2008

    4 김용직, "해방기 한국 시문학사" 민음사 235-307, 1989

    5 송희복, "해방기 문학비평 연구" 문학과지성사 133-138, 1993

    6 "한글"

    7 최동호, "한국적 전통과 현대 불교시의 전개" 한민족어문학회 (40) : 13-362, 2002

    8 "죽순"

    9 홍신선, "조지훈의 시론 연구" 동국대 한국문학연구소 18 : 30-37, 1995

    10 김문주, "조지훈의 ‘서경시’에 함축된 시적 전통의 성격" 한국문학이론과비평학회 11 (11): 9-29, 2007

    1 "현대문학"

    2 권영민, "해방직후의 민족문학운동 연구" 서울대학교출판부 110-115, 1986

    3 박용찬, "해방기의 시조 담론과 시조문학교재의 양상" 한국시조학회 (29) : 255-286, 2008

    4 김용직, "해방기 한국 시문학사" 민음사 235-307, 1989

    5 송희복, "해방기 문학비평 연구" 문학과지성사 133-138, 1993

    6 "한글"

    7 최동호, "한국적 전통과 현대 불교시의 전개" 한민족어문학회 (40) : 13-362, 2002

    8 "죽순"

    9 홍신선, "조지훈의 시론 연구" 동국대 한국문학연구소 18 : 30-37, 1995

    10 김문주, "조지훈의 ‘서경시’에 함축된 시적 전통의 성격" 한국문학이론과비평학회 11 (11): 9-29, 2007

    11 주영중, "조지훈과 김춘수의 시론 연구 : 시론 형성의 문학사적 맥락을 중심으로" 고려대학교 대학원 2009

    12 조지훈, "조지훈 전집" 나남출판 1996

    13 최승호, "조지훈 시학에 있어서 형이상학론적 관점" 서울대 국어국문학과 16 : 233-251, 1991

    14 박남희, "조지훈 시의 유기체적 상상력 연구" 한국현대문예비평학회 (24) : 5-28, 2007

    15 김옥성, "조지훈 시론의 禪的 미학과 그 교육적 의미" 대동문화연구원 (56) : 355-390, 2006

    16 최승호, "조지훈 순수 시론의 몇 가지 이론적 근거, In 한국 현대 시론사" 모음사 454-467, 1992

    17 "조선일보"

    18 이숭원, "정지용의 시론, In 한국 현대 시론사" 모음사 295-309, 1992

    19 박태상, "정지용의 삶과 문학" 깊은샘 230-236, 2010

    20 "인민"

    21 "예술조선"

    22 "예술운동"

    23 "예술"

    24 "신천지"

    25 "신세대"

    26 "신경향"

    27 서정주, "시창작법" 선문사 1949

    28 윤곤강, "시와 진실, In 윤곤강 전집 2" 다운샘 2005

    29 조지훈, "시와 인생" 박영사 1959

    30 서정주, "서정주 문학전집 4" 일지사 1972

    31 "새한민보"

    32 "부인"

    33 "백민"

    34 "민성"

    35 김동리, "문학과 인간" 백민문화사 1948

    36 "문예"

    37 "낭만파"

    38 "국제신문"

    39 "경향신문"

    40 박호영, "‘문장’파의 전통주의, In 한국 현대시론사 연구" 문학과지성사 217-232, 1998

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.56 0.56 0.56
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.54 0.53 0.99 0.1
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼