RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재 SCOPUS

    기업지배구조가 회계정보의 보수성에 미치는 영향 = The Effects of Corporate Governance on Conservativeness of Accounting Information

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A95941028

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examines the effects of corporate governance on the conservativeness of accounting information. First, we investigate whether the overall corporate governance index (which is constructed based on the 2002 and 2003 annual survey by the Corporate Governance Service) and the conser- vativeness of accounting information show a positive relationship. Second, we investigate the relationship between the conservativeness of accounting information and the firm`s ownership structures, which are measured by the rates of the controlling owner`s and the foreign investors` ownerships. We found the following empirical evidences. First, the firms with a high overall corporate governance index report more conservative accounting information, as shown in panel 1 of <table 3>. The control variables such as ROA, △ROA and firm size shows the expected sign and significant. Thus we can conclude that the level of corporate governance and accounting conservativeness have a positive relationship. As for the five subindices of overall corporate governance (shareholders` rights, board, disclosure, audit, and distribution of reserves), only the firms with high scores regarding the disclosure part report significantly more conservative accounting information. For the other subindices, there are no significant differences between the level of conservativeness and the scores of corporate governance. The related results are shown in panel 2 of <table 3>. In general, the firms achieve higher scores for disclosure when they voluntarily disclose financial information, such as IR data, monthly earnings data and expectations, do not adjust their disclosures, and disclose detailed information on mandatory annual reports. Specifically, the firms reporting the following information on their annual reports receive high scores for disclosure the activities of the audit committee, the salary of individual directors, the careers of executives, the rate of appearance of executives in BOD meetings, and their activities and evaluations. The above information is related to the corporate governance in general. Thus the score of disclosure does not signify merely the accounting transparency. It represents corporate transparency as a whole. These results show that when the firm voluntarily discloses information regarding the corporate governance and its financial performances, the accounting transparency also can be improved. With these results, we suggest that the regulatory institution should place more emphasis on the disclosure of overall corporate governance as well as financial performance and conditions. Second, we test how the accounting conservativeness has been influenced by the rate of controlling ownership. The results shown in table 4 show that the coefficient on the rate of controlling ownership is not significant. It can be interpreted that the controlling ownership does not affect the accounting conservativeness, contrary to the expectations of hypothesis 2-1. However, we found a positive relationship between the level of foreign investor ownership and the conservativeness of accounting information. It supports hypothesis 2-2 that the foreign investor acts as an efficient monitor and, by doing so, decreases the information asymmetry between outside shareholders and controlling share- holders. In other words, it can be concluded that the foreign investor contributes to improve corporate governance and accounting transparency. Finally, we find that a positive relationship between the rate of controlling ownership and accounting conservativeness is strong in the sub samples having high scores of corporate governance.
    번역하기

    This study examines the effects of corporate governance on the conservativeness of accounting information. First, we investigate whether the overall corporate governance index (which is constructed based on the 2002 and 2003 annual survey by the Corpo...

    This study examines the effects of corporate governance on the conservativeness of accounting information. First, we investigate whether the overall corporate governance index (which is constructed based on the 2002 and 2003 annual survey by the Corporate Governance Service) and the conser- vativeness of accounting information show a positive relationship. Second, we investigate the relationship between the conservativeness of accounting information and the firm`s ownership structures, which are measured by the rates of the controlling owner`s and the foreign investors` ownerships. We found the following empirical evidences. First, the firms with a high overall corporate governance index report more conservative accounting information, as shown in panel 1 of <table 3>. The control variables such as ROA, △ROA and firm size shows the expected sign and significant. Thus we can conclude that the level of corporate governance and accounting conservativeness have a positive relationship. As for the five subindices of overall corporate governance (shareholders` rights, board, disclosure, audit, and distribution of reserves), only the firms with high scores regarding the disclosure part report significantly more conservative accounting information. For the other subindices, there are no significant differences between the level of conservativeness and the scores of corporate governance. The related results are shown in panel 2 of <table 3>. In general, the firms achieve higher scores for disclosure when they voluntarily disclose financial information, such as IR data, monthly earnings data and expectations, do not adjust their disclosures, and disclose detailed information on mandatory annual reports. Specifically, the firms reporting the following information on their annual reports receive high scores for disclosure the activities of the audit committee, the salary of individual directors, the careers of executives, the rate of appearance of executives in BOD meetings, and their activities and evaluations. The above information is related to the corporate governance in general. Thus the score of disclosure does not signify merely the accounting transparency. It represents corporate transparency as a whole. These results show that when the firm voluntarily discloses information regarding the corporate governance and its financial performances, the accounting transparency also can be improved. With these results, we suggest that the regulatory institution should place more emphasis on the disclosure of overall corporate governance as well as financial performance and conditions. Second, we test how the accounting conservativeness has been influenced by the rate of controlling ownership. The results shown in table 4 show that the coefficient on the rate of controlling ownership is not significant. It can be interpreted that the controlling ownership does not affect the accounting conservativeness, contrary to the expectations of hypothesis 2-1. However, we found a positive relationship between the level of foreign investor ownership and the conservativeness of accounting information. It supports hypothesis 2-2 that the foreign investor acts as an efficient monitor and, by doing so, decreases the information asymmetry between outside shareholders and controlling share- holders. In other words, it can be concluded that the foreign investor contributes to improve corporate governance and accounting transparency. Finally, we find that a positive relationship between the rate of controlling ownership and accounting conservativeness is strong in the sub samples having high scores of corporate governance.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박종성, "회계제도의 개선과 회계정보의 유용성" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 105-134, 2003

    2 김진배, "한국 기업의 회계투명성 측정" 한국공인회계사회 (40) : 31-70, 2004

    3 박종일, "기업지배구조와 이익조정: 최대주주 지분율을 중심으로" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 135-172, 2003

    4 정구열, "기업소유구조와 이익의 정보효과" 한국경영학회 31 (31): 10-1727, 2002

    5 손성규, "감사위원회의 효과: 회계오류를 중심으로" 한국회계학회 29 (29): 61-90, 2004

    6 전규안, "감사위원회의 설치와 이익조정사이의 관계" 한국회계학회 29 (29): 143-178, 2004

    7 이상철, "감사위원회 도입이 이익조정에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 143-172, 2003

    8 Watts R. L, "onservatism in Accounting Part I: Explanations and Implications." 17 (17): 207-221, 2003

    9 Ramaswamy, K, "Variations in ownership behavior and propensity to diversity: A study of the Indian corporate context" (23) : 345-358, 2002

    10 Jensen, M, "Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure" (3) : 305-360, 1976

    1 박종성, "회계제도의 개선과 회계정보의 유용성" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 105-134, 2003

    2 김진배, "한국 기업의 회계투명성 측정" 한국공인회계사회 (40) : 31-70, 2004

    3 박종일, "기업지배구조와 이익조정: 최대주주 지분율을 중심으로" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 135-172, 2003

    4 정구열, "기업소유구조와 이익의 정보효과" 한국경영학회 31 (31): 10-1727, 2002

    5 손성규, "감사위원회의 효과: 회계오류를 중심으로" 한국회계학회 29 (29): 61-90, 2004

    6 전규안, "감사위원회의 설치와 이익조정사이의 관계" 한국회계학회 29 (29): 143-178, 2004

    7 이상철, "감사위원회 도입이 이익조정에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 143-172, 2003

    8 Watts R. L, "onservatism in Accounting Part I: Explanations and Implications." 17 (17): 207-221, 2003

    9 Ramaswamy, K, "Variations in ownership behavior and propensity to diversity: A study of the Indian corporate context" (23) : 345-358, 2002

    10 Jensen, M, "Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure" (3) : 305-360, 1976

    11 Yoon, J, "The effects of changes in conservativeness on value relevance of accounting information: Evidence from the 1997 financial crisis." (42) : 88-101, 2005

    12 Ball, R, "The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings" (29) : 1-51, 2000

    13 Basu, S, "The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings." (24) : 3-37, 1997

    14 Givoly, D, "The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows and accruals: Has financial reporting become more conservative?" (29) : 287-320, 2000

    15 Bhattacharya U, "The World Price of Earnings Opacity" 78 (78): 641-678, 2003

    16 Berle, A, "The Modern Corporation and Private Property" New York, MacMillan 1932

    17 Dechow, P, "The Cause and Consequences of Earnings Management. An Analysis of Firms subject to Enforcement Action by the SEC." (13) : 1-35, 1996

    18 La Porta, R, "Law and Finance" (106) : 1113-1155, 1998

    19 La Porta, R, "Investor Protection and Corporate Governance" (58) : 3-27, 2000

    20 Kochhar, R, "Institutional investors and firm innovation: A test of competing hypotheses" 17 (17): 73-84, 1996

    21 Xie, B, "Earnings Management and Corporate Governance: the Role of the Board and the Audit Committee." (9) : 295-316, 2003

    22 Black, E. S, "Does Corporate Governance Predict Firms' Market Value? Evidence from Korea. Working Paper." 2003

    23 La Porta, R, "Corporate Ownership Around the World" (54) : 471-518, 1999

    24 Paek, W, "Conservatism, Earnings Persistence and Equity Valuation." 29 (29): 1-27, 2004

    25 Park, J, "Changes in Earnings Timeliness and Conservatism Before and After the 1997 Korean Financial Crisis." 2004

    26 Abbott, L, "Auditor Selection and Audit Committee Characteristics. Auditing" (19) : 47-66, 2000

    27 Beasley, M, "An Empirical Analysis of the Relation Between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud." 71 (71): 443-465, 1996

    28 Penman, S, "Accounting conservatism, the quality of earnings, and stock returns" (77) : 237-264, 2002

    29 Mitton, T, "A Cross-Firm Analysis of the Impact of Corporate Governance on the East Asian Financial Crisis" (64) : 215-241, 2002

    30 박종찬, "1997년 금융위기 이후 회계제도 개혁에 따른 이익의 적시성과 보수성 변화" 한국회계학회 30 (30): 1-26, 2005

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2020 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2015-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.96 1.96 2.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.65 2.74 5.829 0.22
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼