RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      무용의 기호현상에 대한 연구 = A Study on Semiosis in Dance

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A87901233

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study focuses on the fact that implicative meaning and aesthetic phenomena of dance art brought by mutual cooperative systems of dance is semiosis. The study reads the phenomena by introducing authentic semiological theory, which is a view that being a sign, dance is not only mere interpretant of meaning but also a ``symbol``, an aesthetic code. semiosis in dance generates signs through signifying by signifiant and signifier. In the process of doing it, signs come to rotate endlessly in the network of relations of continual semiosis by denotation and implicative meaning, representing objects. Cooperative mutual relations regarding dance phenomenon with strong epic stories sometimes deliver meaning about types of characters. Semiological methodology, which analyze structure of dance phenomenon as well as the message the simple epic delivers, presents diversion to the image, ended in the combination with non-verbal language given by dance, that is the ideological image. A Symbol as an image of art creates mythological image with semiotic process, which is a union of a sign and the content of the sign by interaction between sign items ,such as icons, index, and symbols in dance phenomenon and continuous relations brought by dynamics of signifiant. These relations between aesthetic code and decoding provide signs of dance with representativeness, and it manages to explain the artistic territory where transposition beyond this world can occur. From the semiological view of this study, the study and extension of the territory of dance semiology is required. Although dance is significant enough with its current domain of signification and communication, if we associate with diverse humanities for its expanding into a field of more artistry, we will have more objective procedures for verifying a category called art and find a clear solution.
      번역하기

      This study focuses on the fact that implicative meaning and aesthetic phenomena of dance art brought by mutual cooperative systems of dance is semiosis. The study reads the phenomena by introducing authentic semiological theory, which is a view that b...

      This study focuses on the fact that implicative meaning and aesthetic phenomena of dance art brought by mutual cooperative systems of dance is semiosis. The study reads the phenomena by introducing authentic semiological theory, which is a view that being a sign, dance is not only mere interpretant of meaning but also a ``symbol``, an aesthetic code. semiosis in dance generates signs through signifying by signifiant and signifier. In the process of doing it, signs come to rotate endlessly in the network of relations of continual semiosis by denotation and implicative meaning, representing objects. Cooperative mutual relations regarding dance phenomenon with strong epic stories sometimes deliver meaning about types of characters. Semiological methodology, which analyze structure of dance phenomenon as well as the message the simple epic delivers, presents diversion to the image, ended in the combination with non-verbal language given by dance, that is the ideological image. A Symbol as an image of art creates mythological image with semiotic process, which is a union of a sign and the content of the sign by interaction between sign items ,such as icons, index, and symbols in dance phenomenon and continuous relations brought by dynamics of signifiant. These relations between aesthetic code and decoding provide signs of dance with representativeness, and it manages to explain the artistic territory where transposition beyond this world can occur. From the semiological view of this study, the study and extension of the territory of dance semiology is required. Although dance is significant enough with its current domain of signification and communication, if we associate with diverse humanities for its expanding into a field of more artistry, we will have more objective procedures for verifying a category called art and find a clear solution.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이도흠, "현대기호학의 새로운 흐름과 전망" 고려대학교 한국학 연구소 19 : 2003

      2 김지원, "한국춤의 코드와 해석" 서울:한양대학교 출판부 2006

      3 김지원, "퍼스 기호이론의 무용기호학적 적용 연구" 대한무용학회 50 (50): 15-28, 2007

      4 가와노히로시, "예술기호정보" 서울:새길 1999

      5 김지원, "바르뜨 기호학을 통한 지전춤의 신화적 의미 분석" 한국언어문화학회 (31) : 232-256, 2006

      6 김성수, "민속학춤 연구" 서울: 도서출판 한림원 25-, 2005

      7 김경용, "기호학이란 무엇인가" 서울: 민음사 2003

      8 오원교, "구조주의와 기호학" 1982

      9 Langer, "Problems of Art" 1957

      10 "Man Beyond Words" State Univ 1976

      1 이도흠, "현대기호학의 새로운 흐름과 전망" 고려대학교 한국학 연구소 19 : 2003

      2 김지원, "한국춤의 코드와 해석" 서울:한양대학교 출판부 2006

      3 김지원, "퍼스 기호이론의 무용기호학적 적용 연구" 대한무용학회 50 (50): 15-28, 2007

      4 가와노히로시, "예술기호정보" 서울:새길 1999

      5 김지원, "바르뜨 기호학을 통한 지전춤의 신화적 의미 분석" 한국언어문화학회 (31) : 232-256, 2006

      6 김성수, "민속학춤 연구" 서울: 도서출판 한림원 25-, 2005

      7 김경용, "기호학이란 무엇인가" 서울: 민음사 2003

      8 오원교, "구조주의와 기호학" 1982

      9 Langer, "Problems of Art" 1957

      10 "Man Beyond Words" State Univ 1976

      11 "Handbook of Semiotics" Indiana Univ Press 1990

      12 Ferdinand de Saussure, "Course in General Linguistics" 1959

      13 Ferdinand de Saussure, "Course in General Linguistics" McGraw-Hill 1966

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.75 0.75 0.71
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.75 0.71 0.723 0.25
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼