RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국 근대건축의 보존과 활용  :  명동지역의 장소성을 중심으로 = Revitalization of modern Architecture in Korea : A study on the elements showing Placeness in Myeong Dong, Seoul

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A35494774

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In case of modern building, compare with the cultural properties building which its principles is preservation of original form, which has not designated but has historical value may rise up preservation and practical use. At this time the building's preservation limit are considered. This is determined through practical program, production motive of repair and enlargement of a building, the circumference context and analyze of value which endowed with building. Architecture is a culture of the time. If there have something needed as like equipment according to the function which needs to be added, it must be made as form which can express culture. Harmony of old equipment with new equipment is essential at this time. In addition, utilization based on historical and cultural education has to have program which can gives pleasure. First of all, it needs to reduce risk of extinction according to problem of preservation and practical use of historical building. Then it is considered that how it can be utilized of the preservation building. According to the relationship between preservation and practical use, a question how inhabitant participates will be important problems preservation of cultural heritage.
    Towards the end of the Joseun Dynasty, Seoul had extended itself outside the In the design of old city center, it is important to develop new functions and facilities based on the detailed investigation of the historical background. Therefore, it is necessary to take historical approach to reflect on studies of the past in the revitalization of Myeong Dong, Seoul, Korea. Myeong Dong has long been developed as the center of Seoul that possess many functions and landmarks. Myeong Dong has the following characteristics and uniqueness.
    Myeong Dong Catholic Cathedral and Chinese Embassy preserve the 'Uniqueness' and 'Placeness' of Myeong Dong. This can play a basic role to characterize Myeong Dongin the design process of specific units.
    The buildings and the streets which have experienced the history since the formation of Modern Myeong Dong are the physical characteristics of Myeong Dong.
    Myeong Dong has many art works and buildings that are created by Korean modern artists and architects. It is urgent to maintain those art works and buildings at the verge of extinction of those historical landmarks.
    It is necessary to design a revitalization plan to reflect on those physical characteristics and uniqueness of Myeong Dong. Although occupants and usages of buildings have changed, the 'Placeness' of a specific region can remain intact as long as the uniqueness of the place is preserved and people have memories to it.
    번역하기

    In case of modern building, compare with the cultural properties building which its principles is preservation of original form, which has not designated but has historical value may rise up preservation and practical use. At this time the building's ...

    In case of modern building, compare with the cultural properties building which its principles is preservation of original form, which has not designated but has historical value may rise up preservation and practical use. At this time the building's preservation limit are considered. This is determined through practical program, production motive of repair and enlargement of a building, the circumference context and analyze of value which endowed with building. Architecture is a culture of the time. If there have something needed as like equipment according to the function which needs to be added, it must be made as form which can express culture. Harmony of old equipment with new equipment is essential at this time. In addition, utilization based on historical and cultural education has to have program which can gives pleasure. First of all, it needs to reduce risk of extinction according to problem of preservation and practical use of historical building. Then it is considered that how it can be utilized of the preservation building. According to the relationship between preservation and practical use, a question how inhabitant participates will be important problems preservation of cultural heritage.
    Towards the end of the Joseun Dynasty, Seoul had extended itself outside the In the design of old city center, it is important to develop new functions and facilities based on the detailed investigation of the historical background. Therefore, it is necessary to take historical approach to reflect on studies of the past in the revitalization of Myeong Dong, Seoul, Korea. Myeong Dong has long been developed as the center of Seoul that possess many functions and landmarks. Myeong Dong has the following characteristics and uniqueness.
    Myeong Dong Catholic Cathedral and Chinese Embassy preserve the 'Uniqueness' and 'Placeness' of Myeong Dong. This can play a basic role to characterize Myeong Dongin the design process of specific units.
    The buildings and the streets which have experienced the history since the formation of Modern Myeong Dong are the physical characteristics of Myeong Dong.
    Myeong Dong has many art works and buildings that are created by Korean modern artists and architects. It is urgent to maintain those art works and buildings at the verge of extinction of those historical landmarks.
    It is necessary to design a revitalization plan to reflect on those physical characteristics and uniqueness of Myeong Dong. Although occupants and usages of buildings have changed, the 'Placeness' of a specific region can remain intact as long as the uniqueness of the place is preserved and people have memories to it.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • 1. 한국 근대 건축물의 현실
    • 2. 근대 역사유산의 보조놔 활용의 유형구분
    • 3. 도시속의 역사문화 환경과 장소성
    • Ⅱ. 명동에 관한 고찰
    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • 1. 한국 근대 건축물의 현실
    • 2. 근대 역사유산의 보조놔 활용의 유형구분
    • 3. 도시속의 역사문화 환경과 장소성
    • Ⅱ. 명동에 관한 고찰
    • 1. 한국 근현대사에서 명동의 의미
    • 2. 명동의 변천과정
    • Ⅲ. 명동의 물리적 대표 요소
    • 1. 명동의 고정요소
    • 2. 명동의 변화요소
    • Ⅳ. 경험에 의한 장소성
    • Ⅴ. 맺음말
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "歷史的遺産の保存とまちつくり: 個の歷史的遺産の活用手法(田ひろ子)" 學藝出版社 1997

    2 "歷史ある建物の活かし方" 學藝出版社 1999

    3 "현대도시건축의 문맥성(Contextuality)에 관한 연구" 2001.10

    4 "한양경성 서울을 걷다" 다인아트 2004

    5 "일본의 근대건축물 보전 연구" 서울시정개발연구원 2000

    6 "우리건축 100년" 현암사 2002

    7 "서울의 옛모습" 서울학연구소 1995

    8 "서울에 딴스 홀을 허하라" 현실문화연구 1999

    9 "서울 남촌:시간, 장소 사람" 서울학연구소 3 : 2003

    10 "모던뽀이 경성을 거닐다" 현실문화연구 2003

    1 "歷史的遺産の保存とまちつくり: 個の歷史的遺産の活用手法(田ひろ子)" 學藝出版社 1997

    2 "歷史ある建物の活かし方" 學藝出版社 1999

    3 "현대도시건축의 문맥성(Contextuality)에 관한 연구" 2001.10

    4 "한양경성 서울을 걷다" 다인아트 2004

    5 "일본의 근대건축물 보전 연구" 서울시정개발연구원 2000

    6 "우리건축 100년" 현암사 2002

    7 "서울의 옛모습" 서울학연구소 1995

    8 "서울에 딴스 홀을 허하라" 현실문화연구 1999

    9 "서울 남촌:시간, 장소 사람" 서울학연구소 3 : 2003

    10 "모던뽀이 경성을 거닐다" 현실문화연구 2003

    11 "도시설계의 기본원리" 태림문화사 2003

    12 "도시개발과 역사문화환경" 대한건축학회 1996

    13 "김정동 교수의 근대건축기행" 도서출판 푸른역사 1999

    14 "기본도심 활성화사업의 기초적 평가와 개선방안에 관한 연구" 2004

    15 "1994 다시 돌아와 본 서울"

    16 "1993 명동지역의 도시적 맥락에 관한 연구 건물을 중심으로"

    17 "1993 도심부 근대 건축물의 보존과 활용 명동지역의 현황과 개선방향" 한국건축역사학회 월례회 강연집

    18 "1990 도시촌락 조사법" 법문사

    19 "1984 한국 개항기 도시변화과정 연구"

    20 "1982 한국개항기 도시사회경제사 연구"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2025 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2020-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2019-12-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
    2018-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-10-02 학술지명변경 한글명 : 서울학연구 -> 서울학연구 KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL () KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.63 0.63 0.68
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.61 0.62 1.483 0.14
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼