RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    고아 저작물과 저작권법의 목적 = Orphan Works and the Purpose of Copyright Law -With the Analysis of Google Book Project

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101824362

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    An orphan work is defined as a situation where the owner of copyrighted work cannot be identified and located by someone who wishes to make use of the work in a manner that requires the permission of the copyright owner. Recently, an orphan work has attracted attention due to the Google book project. However, the Google book project is just one example of many cases where copyrighted works cause problems to be used in the industry. If someone wants to use copyrighted works, he/she has to have permission from owners of copyrighted works in advance. However, it is usually hard for a potential user to find out a owner of a copyrighted work due to inadequate information and the change of ownership during copyright term. Moreover, extension of copyright term accelerates such difficulty. Google book project is a plan to digitalize all books in the world. The first problem that Google met was to obtain permissions from each right holder. The conflicts between Google and right holders developed into a law suit. Right holders claimed copyright infringement, but Google insisted non-infringement based on fair use. The case finally ended with preliminary settlement which was amended later. However, ultimately, the settlement cannot resolve orphan work problems and the U.S Copyright Office issued a Report on Orphan Works. This Copyright Office`s recommendation were incorporated into the Orphan Works Act of 2006, Copyright Modernization Act of 2006 and Orphan Works Act of 2008, but were never adopted as law. Korean copyright law has a compulsory license clause for orphan works and orphan works problems have received less attention in Korea than in the U.S. However, that does not mean that the compulsory license clause has no problem at all. Recently, Korean copyright law was amended to include industrial development as its purpose. Regardless of plausibility of industrial development as a copyright purpose, copyright law must increase user`s accessibility to copyrighted works in order to accomplish its purpose, industrial development. Accordingly, the compulsory license clause for orphan works shall be reviewed from such a perspective.
    번역하기

    An orphan work is defined as a situation where the owner of copyrighted work cannot be identified and located by someone who wishes to make use of the work in a manner that requires the permission of the copyright owner. Recently, an orphan work has a...

    An orphan work is defined as a situation where the owner of copyrighted work cannot be identified and located by someone who wishes to make use of the work in a manner that requires the permission of the copyright owner. Recently, an orphan work has attracted attention due to the Google book project. However, the Google book project is just one example of many cases where copyrighted works cause problems to be used in the industry. If someone wants to use copyrighted works, he/she has to have permission from owners of copyrighted works in advance. However, it is usually hard for a potential user to find out a owner of a copyrighted work due to inadequate information and the change of ownership during copyright term. Moreover, extension of copyright term accelerates such difficulty. Google book project is a plan to digitalize all books in the world. The first problem that Google met was to obtain permissions from each right holder. The conflicts between Google and right holders developed into a law suit. Right holders claimed copyright infringement, but Google insisted non-infringement based on fair use. The case finally ended with preliminary settlement which was amended later. However, ultimately, the settlement cannot resolve orphan work problems and the U.S Copyright Office issued a Report on Orphan Works. This Copyright Office`s recommendation were incorporated into the Orphan Works Act of 2006, Copyright Modernization Act of 2006 and Orphan Works Act of 2008, but were never adopted as law. Korean copyright law has a compulsory license clause for orphan works and orphan works problems have received less attention in Korea than in the U.S. However, that does not mean that the compulsory license clause has no problem at all. Recently, Korean copyright law was amended to include industrial development as its purpose. Regardless of plausibility of industrial development as a copyright purpose, copyright law must increase user`s accessibility to copyrighted works in order to accomplish its purpose, industrial development. Accordingly, the compulsory license clause for orphan works shall be reviewed from such a perspective.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼