RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    이언진과 일본문사의 왕세정 관련 필담 = Conversation with Writings on Wang Sejeong of between Lee Unjin and Japanese Writers

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82751440

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper analyzed conversation with writing between Lee Unjin who was sent to Japan as a member of the delegation to Japan and Japanese literary men in 1763. Especially it centered on conversation on Wang Sejeong. Before going to Japan as an envoy, Lee Unjin`s status was not very high. However his status of the group of the delegation to Japan gradually stood out through poem written in there and conversation with writings related with Japanese writers. Japanese writers appreciated Lee Unjin more valuable than other writers having higher status than Lee Unjin. Materials of conversation with writings of now remaining in Japan including conversations with Lee Unjin are six. These are Gujeongnammyung`s Ahngahngyeohang, Ohjeonsangjae`s Yanghoyeohwa, Gungroeyoungmun`s Dongsayeodam, Guemjeongsongahm`s Seongahngphildam, Naesansokjae`s Sokjaetamseungcho and Namcheongeumgye`s Geumgyejabhwa. Arguments surrounding Wang Sejeong almost recorded without exception in their conversation were interesting. While Wang Sejeong was not appreciated by Joseon writers, he was very highly appreciated by Japanese writers in that times. In this situations, as Lee Unjin repeatedly represented his view evaluating Wang Sejeong unlike other Joseon writers, Japanese writers were intensely interested to him. However, understandings on Wang Sejeong were different in level and were not same focal point between Lee Unjin and Japanese writers through several conversation with writings. While Lee Unjin appreciated not Wang Sejeong`s classical feature but his study scale and infinite changing in sentences, Japanese writers appreciated aspects of ancient writers of Lee Banryong and Wang Sejeong located in a row. To conclude, views of each other were different. This paper confirmed this differences through detailed researching on contents of conversation with writings. Also, as this paper studied situations and meanings on debates between Joseon writers and Japanese writers in that times, this paper prepared the basement on deepened arguments afterward.
    번역하기

    This paper analyzed conversation with writing between Lee Unjin who was sent to Japan as a member of the delegation to Japan and Japanese literary men in 1763. Especially it centered on conversation on Wang Sejeong. Before going to Japan as an envoy, ...

    This paper analyzed conversation with writing between Lee Unjin who was sent to Japan as a member of the delegation to Japan and Japanese literary men in 1763. Especially it centered on conversation on Wang Sejeong. Before going to Japan as an envoy, Lee Unjin`s status was not very high. However his status of the group of the delegation to Japan gradually stood out through poem written in there and conversation with writings related with Japanese writers. Japanese writers appreciated Lee Unjin more valuable than other writers having higher status than Lee Unjin. Materials of conversation with writings of now remaining in Japan including conversations with Lee Unjin are six. These are Gujeongnammyung`s Ahngahngyeohang, Ohjeonsangjae`s Yanghoyeohwa, Gungroeyoungmun`s Dongsayeodam, Guemjeongsongahm`s Seongahngphildam, Naesansokjae`s Sokjaetamseungcho and Namcheongeumgye`s Geumgyejabhwa. Arguments surrounding Wang Sejeong almost recorded without exception in their conversation were interesting. While Wang Sejeong was not appreciated by Joseon writers, he was very highly appreciated by Japanese writers in that times. In this situations, as Lee Unjin repeatedly represented his view evaluating Wang Sejeong unlike other Joseon writers, Japanese writers were intensely interested to him. However, understandings on Wang Sejeong were different in level and were not same focal point between Lee Unjin and Japanese writers through several conversation with writings. While Lee Unjin appreciated not Wang Sejeong`s classical feature but his study scale and infinite changing in sentences, Japanese writers appreciated aspects of ancient writers of Lee Banryong and Wang Sejeong located in a row. To conclude, views of each other were different. This paper confirmed this differences through detailed researching on contents of conversation with writings. Also, as this paper studied situations and meanings on debates between Joseon writers and Japanese writers in that times, this paper prepared the basement on deepened arguments afterward.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 한태문, "李彦瑱의 문학관과 通信使行에서의 세계인식" 부산대 국어국문학회 34 : 1997

    2 高橋博已, "李彦瑱の橫顔" 2005

    3 奧田尙齋, "兩好餘話"

    4 이용휴, "혜환 이용휴 시전집" 소명출판 1-310, 2002

    5 피정희, "조선후기 한문학작가론" 집문당 447-467,

    6 元重擧, "조선후기 지식인, 일본과 만나다" 소명출판 2006

    7 이혜순, "조선통신사의 문학" 이화여대출판부 1-407, 1996

    8 박희병, "저항과 아만" 돌베개 2009

    9 이노구치 아츠시, "일본한문학사" 소명출판 1-876, 2000

    10 한태문, "위항문인의 壬戌使行記 연구" 부산대 국어국문학회 30 : 195-213, 1993

    1 한태문, "李彦瑱의 문학관과 通信使行에서의 세계인식" 부산대 국어국문학회 34 : 1997

    2 高橋博已, "李彦瑱の橫顔" 2005

    3 奧田尙齋, "兩好餘話"

    4 이용휴, "혜환 이용휴 시전집" 소명출판 1-310, 2002

    5 피정희, "조선후기 한문학작가론" 집문당 447-467,

    6 元重擧, "조선후기 지식인, 일본과 만나다" 소명출판 2006

    7 이혜순, "조선통신사의 문학" 이화여대출판부 1-407, 1996

    8 박희병, "저항과 아만" 돌베개 2009

    9 이노구치 아츠시, "일본한문학사" 소명출판 1-876, 2000

    10 한태문, "위항문인의 壬戌使行記 연구" 부산대 국어국문학회 30 : 195-213, 1993

    11 박재금, "와신상담의 마음으로 일본을 기록하다" 소명출판 2006

    12 鄭珉, "연암 尺牘小品의 문예미" 한국한문학회 (31) : 49-87, 2003

    13 成大中, "부사산 비파호를 날 듯이 건너" 소명출판 2006

    14 강명관, "공안파와 조선후기 한문학" 소명출판 2007

    15 정민, "고전문장론과 연암 박지원" 태학사 2010

    16 구지현, "계미통신사 사행문학연구" 보고사 2006

    17 南川金溪, "金溪雜話"

    18 강동엽, "虞裳傳에 투영된 李彦瑱과 그의 세계인식" 건국어문학회 19 : 55-76, 1995

    19 內山粟齋, "粟齋探勝草 in 附錄 韓客唱和" 附錄 韓客唱和

    20 今井松庵, "松庵筆談"

    21 宮瀨龍門, "東槎餘談 in 泱泱餘響" 葦書房有限會社 1977

    22 高橋博已, "東アジアの文藝共和國" 2009

    23 김성진, "南玉의 생애와 일본에서의 筆談唱和" 한국한문학회 19 : 273-300, 1996

    24 정민, "『東?餘談』에 실린 李彦?의 필담 자료와 그 의미" 한국한문학회 (32) : 87-123, 2003

    25 정민, "18세기 조선지식인의 발견" 휴머니스트 2008

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-11-06 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국학연구소 -> 동아시아문화연구소
    영문명 : 미등록 -> Institute for East Asian Cultures
    KCI등재후보
    2009-11-04 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국학논집 -> 동아시아문화연구
    외국어명 : The Journal of Korean Studies -> Journal of East Aisan Cultures
    KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.44 0.44 0.43
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.44 0.41 0.784 0.34
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼