RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    지방재정 건전성 측정방법: 재정압박 지수개발을 중심으로 = A Method of Measuring Local Fiscal Health: Focusing on Developing Fiscal Stress Indices

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103985523

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The fiscal health of local government is essential to the provision of local public services. The term fiscal crisis was used recently, but the terms fiscal crisis and fiscal stress should be distinguished from one another. After reviewing the literature and operational definitions of fiscal crisis that have been utilized by state and local governments in the U. S. and Japan, this study argues that local government in Korea is in fiscal stress, which may lead to a fiscal crisis.
    This study also develops fiscal stress indices that measure fiscal pressures in terms of revenue, expenditure, operation, and debt. Revenue-related indicators include own-source revenue relative to total revenue, the growth rate of own-source revenue, and the disposable resources of local government. On the expenditure side, fixed costs, capital spending, and subsidy provisions to welfare agencies cause fiscal stress to local government. Internal operation measures include operating deficits as a percentage of total expenditure and ratios of current assets to current liabilities. Measures that stress the ability to meet debt obligations include debt divided by general revenues, per capita debt, and debt service as a percentage of general revenues. A reference group was used as a basis for comparison in order to measure the fiscal health of a particular local government.
    번역하기

    The fiscal health of local government is essential to the provision of local public services. The term fiscal crisis was used recently, but the terms fiscal crisis and fiscal stress should be distinguished from one another. After reviewing the literat...

    The fiscal health of local government is essential to the provision of local public services. The term fiscal crisis was used recently, but the terms fiscal crisis and fiscal stress should be distinguished from one another. After reviewing the literature and operational definitions of fiscal crisis that have been utilized by state and local governments in the U. S. and Japan, this study argues that local government in Korea is in fiscal stress, which may lead to a fiscal crisis.
    This study also develops fiscal stress indices that measure fiscal pressures in terms of revenue, expenditure, operation, and debt. Revenue-related indicators include own-source revenue relative to total revenue, the growth rate of own-source revenue, and the disposable resources of local government. On the expenditure side, fixed costs, capital spending, and subsidy provisions to welfare agencies cause fiscal stress to local government. Internal operation measures include operating deficits as a percentage of total expenditure and ratios of current assets to current liabilities. Measures that stress the ability to meet debt obligations include debt divided by general revenues, per capita debt, and debt service as a percentage of general revenues. A reference group was used as a basis for comparison in order to measure the fiscal health of a particular local government.

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The fiscal health of local government is essential to the provision of local public services. The term fiscal crisis was used recently, but the terms fiscal crisis and fiscal stress should be distinguished from one another. After reviewing the literature and operational definitions of fiscal crisis that have been utilized by state and local governments in the U. S. and Japan, this study argues that local government in Korea is in fiscal stress, which may lead to a fiscal crisis.
    This study also develops fiscal stress indices that measure fiscal pressures in terms of revenue, expenditure, operation, and debt. Revenue-related indicators include own-source revenue relative to total revenue, the growth rate of own-source revenue, and the disposable resources of local government. On the expenditure side, fixed costs, capital spending, and subsidy provisions to welfare agencies cause fiscal stress to local government. Internal operation measures include operating deficits as a percentage of total expenditure and ratios of current assets to current liabilities. Measures that stress the ability to meet debt obligations include debt divided by general revenues, per capita debt, and debt service as a percentage of general revenues. A reference group was used as a basis for comparison in order to measure the fiscal health of a particular local government.
    번역하기

    The fiscal health of local government is essential to the provision of local public services. The term fiscal crisis was used recently, but the terms fiscal crisis and fiscal stress should be distinguished from one another. After reviewing the literat...

    The fiscal health of local government is essential to the provision of local public services. The term fiscal crisis was used recently, but the terms fiscal crisis and fiscal stress should be distinguished from one another. After reviewing the literature and operational definitions of fiscal crisis that have been utilized by state and local governments in the U. S. and Japan, this study argues that local government in Korea is in fiscal stress, which may lead to a fiscal crisis.
    This study also develops fiscal stress indices that measure fiscal pressures in terms of revenue, expenditure, operation, and debt. Revenue-related indicators include own-source revenue relative to total revenue, the growth rate of own-source revenue, and the disposable resources of local government. On the expenditure side, fixed costs, capital spending, and subsidy provisions to welfare agencies cause fiscal stress to local government. Internal operation measures include operating deficits as a percentage of total expenditure and ratios of current assets to current liabilities. Measures that stress the ability to meet debt obligations include debt divided by general revenues, per capita debt, and debt service as a percentage of general revenues. A reference group was used as a basis for comparison in order to measure the fiscal health of a particular local government.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김동욱, "최근 외국지방자치단체의 재정위기 극복 사례" 59-78, 2010

    2 김현아, "지방정부 재정위기 관리에 대한 논의" 한국조세연구원 6-26, 2007

    3 조기현, "지방재정관리제도 운용실태와 개선방안: 지방재정위기 대응 방안을 중심으로" 한국지방행정연구원 2008

    4 박병희, "지방재정, 위기인가" 3-21, 2010

    5 행정안전부, "지방재정 건전성 강화방안"

    6 이상용, "지방자치단체의 선심성・전시성 예산의 통제방안" 17-34, 2010

    7 김범식, "지방자치단체의 ‘재정위기’에 대한 실증분석" 15 (15): 75-92, 1999

    8 국회예산정책처, "지방자치단체 재정난의 원인과 대책" 2010

    9 김종웅, "자치단체 재정건전성 평가방안에 관한 연구: 재정평가지표를 이용한 경상북도의 사례를 중심으로" 12 (12): 171-197, 2003

    10 남황우, "일본의 지방재정건전화 조치" 140-159, 2010

    1 김동욱, "최근 외국지방자치단체의 재정위기 극복 사례" 59-78, 2010

    2 김현아, "지방정부 재정위기 관리에 대한 논의" 한국조세연구원 6-26, 2007

    3 조기현, "지방재정관리제도 운용실태와 개선방안: 지방재정위기 대응 방안을 중심으로" 한국지방행정연구원 2008

    4 박병희, "지방재정, 위기인가" 3-21, 2010

    5 행정안전부, "지방재정 건전성 강화방안"

    6 이상용, "지방자치단체의 선심성・전시성 예산의 통제방안" 17-34, 2010

    7 김범식, "지방자치단체의 ‘재정위기’에 대한 실증분석" 15 (15): 75-92, 1999

    8 국회예산정책처, "지방자치단체 재정난의 원인과 대책" 2010

    9 김종웅, "자치단체 재정건전성 평가방안에 관한 연구: 재정평가지표를 이용한 경상북도의 사례를 중심으로" 12 (12): 171-197, 2003

    10 남황우, "일본의 지방재정건전화 조치" 140-159, 2010

    11 이창균, "일본의 자치단체재정건전화법 도입에 의한 새로운 재정분석" 148-162, 2008

    12 서정섭, "우리나라 지방재정의 건전성 분석" 한국지방행정연구원 18 (18): 237-256, 2004

    13 정재철, "미국 대도시의 재정위기와 지방정부의 대책: 뉴욕시를 중심으로" 13 (13): 65-91, 1999

    14 Standard, "U.S. Public Finance: Key General Obligation Ratio Credit Ratings: Analysis vs. Reality" 2008

    15 Honadle,B.W, "The States' Role in U. S. Local Government Fiscal Crisis: A Theoretical Model and Results of a National Survey" 26 (26): 1431-1472, 2003

    16 Stein,R, "The New York City Budget: Anatomy of a Fiscal Crisis" (겨울) : 1-12, 1976

    17 Berne R, "The Financial Analysis of Governments" Prentice-Hall 1986

    18 Sohl, S, "Measuring the Financial Position of Municipalities: Numbers Do not Speak for Themselves" (가을) : 74-96, 2009

    19 Wang, X., "Measuring Financial Condition: A Study of U.S. States" (여름) : 1-21, 2007

    20 State of Ohio, "Local Government: Fiscal Emergency/Fiscal Watch Law Fact Sheet" 2010

    21 Aronson, J. R, "Is there a Fiscal Crisis Outside New York" 31 (31): 135-155, 1978

    22 Inman.R.P, "How To Have a Fiscal Crisis: Lessons from Philadelphia" 85 (85): 378-383, 1995

    23 Groves, S., "Financial Indicators for Local Government" (여름) : 5-19, 1981

    24 Citizens Research Council of Michigan, "Financial Emergencies in Michigan Local Government" 2010

    25 Office of the New York State Comptroller, "Financial Condition Analysis" 2002

    26 행정안전부, "FY 2009 지방자치단체 재정분석 통계자료"

    27 한국지방행정연구원, "FY 2008 지방자치단체 재정분석 통계자료"

    28 Morgan. D. R, "Explaining Fiscal Stress Among Large U. S. Cities Toward an Integrative Model" 3 (3): 73-78, 1983

    29 Groves, S, "Evaluating Financial Condition: A Handbook for Local Government" International City/County Manager Association 2003

    30 Kloha, P, "Developing and Testing a Composite Model to Predict Local Fiscal Stress" 65 (65): 313-323, 2005

    31 Hendrick,R, "Assessing and Measuring the Fiscal Health of Local governments: Focus on Chicago Suburban Municipalities" 40 (40): 78-114, 2004

    32 행정안전부, "2010년도 지방자치단체 재정분석 편람" 2010

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-04-18 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korea Journal of Local Finance -> The Korea Journal of Local Public Finance KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.22 1.22 1.26
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.13 1.01 1.479 0.17
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼