RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    국제정치이론 관점에서 본 오바마 행정부의 외교안보정책

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82731477

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    While the Republicans of the United States have pursued realist internationalism as its foreign policy thought, the Democrats have followed liberal internationalism. The Obama administration is in line with the traditional Democratic thought of foreign policy. However, the Obama administration’s foreign and security policy encompasses various thoughts stemming from international relations theories besides liberalism: realism, neorealism, constructivism and theory of international society.
    The administration adopts liberalism by emphasizing international cooperation to resolve the major problems such as terrorism, climate change, epidemic disease, by valuing international organizations such as the United Nations, and by pushing for ‘smart diplomacy,’ ‘public diplomacy,’ and ‘multilateral diplomacy.’ Liberalism is also reflected in the policies of ‘Nuclear Free World’ and toward Israel-Palestine since the policies are based on the principle of international cooperation and dialogue. The Nuclear Free World policy also includes constructivism in that it sets an ideational goal and appeals to international support for the goal. Constructivism lays more importance on idea, value and culture than on material elements.
    The theory of international society is seen in the policies toward Israel-Palestine and the revolutions in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). The Obama administration put forward the idea of ‘keeping the 1967 borders,’ which reflected international society theorists’ idea of ‘order accommodating just change.’ By observing the principle of self-determination in terms of the revolutions in the MENA, the Washington government expressed its belief that sovereignty and mutual recognition should be respected, which is a significant argument of international society theory. Additionally, the government employs realism and neorealism by putting importance on military power, reinforcing its hard power, and pursuing hegemony in the Americas and offshore balancing in Northeast Asia. In brief, it could be argued that the Obama administration’s foreign and security policy is following so-called ‘comprehensive liberal internationalism.’
    번역하기

    While the Republicans of the United States have pursued realist internationalism as its foreign policy thought, the Democrats have followed liberal internationalism. The Obama administration is in line with the traditional Democratic thought of foreig...

    While the Republicans of the United States have pursued realist internationalism as its foreign policy thought, the Democrats have followed liberal internationalism. The Obama administration is in line with the traditional Democratic thought of foreign policy. However, the Obama administration’s foreign and security policy encompasses various thoughts stemming from international relations theories besides liberalism: realism, neorealism, constructivism and theory of international society.
    The administration adopts liberalism by emphasizing international cooperation to resolve the major problems such as terrorism, climate change, epidemic disease, by valuing international organizations such as the United Nations, and by pushing for ‘smart diplomacy,’ ‘public diplomacy,’ and ‘multilateral diplomacy.’ Liberalism is also reflected in the policies of ‘Nuclear Free World’ and toward Israel-Palestine since the policies are based on the principle of international cooperation and dialogue. The Nuclear Free World policy also includes constructivism in that it sets an ideational goal and appeals to international support for the goal. Constructivism lays more importance on idea, value and culture than on material elements.
    The theory of international society is seen in the policies toward Israel-Palestine and the revolutions in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). The Obama administration put forward the idea of ‘keeping the 1967 borders,’ which reflected international society theorists’ idea of ‘order accommodating just change.’ By observing the principle of self-determination in terms of the revolutions in the MENA, the Washington government expressed its belief that sovereignty and mutual recognition should be respected, which is a significant argument of international society theory. Additionally, the government employs realism and neorealism by putting importance on military power, reinforcing its hard power, and pursuing hegemony in the Americas and offshore balancing in Northeast Asia. In brief, it could be argued that the Obama administration’s foreign and security policy is following so-called ‘comprehensive liberal internationalism.’

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이삼성, "현대 미국외교와 국제정치" 한길사 1993

    2 임민혁, "지금 남북정상회담이 현실적인가는 미국 아닌 청와대가 답해야 할 일"

    3 김재천, "오바마 행정부의 출범과 미국의 대 한반도 안보정책 함의" 미국학연구소 32 (32): 145-168, 2009

    4 안병준, "오바마 행정부의 외교정책과 한반도의 미래" (91) : 2009

    5 이춘근, "오바마 행정부의 외교안보 정책과 한반도" 3 (3): 2008

    6 남궁곤, "오바마 행정부 국제주의 외교정책 이념의 역사적 유산과 실제" 한국국제정치학회 50 (50): 91-118, 2010

    7 이성형, "오바마 정부와 라틴아메리카: 선린외교에서 힘의 외교로?" 한국라틴아메리카학회 23 (23): 43-82, 2010

    8 이삼성, "세계와 미국: 20세기의 반성과 21세기의 전망" 한길사 2001

    9 헌트, 마이클 H., "변화보다는 답습을 택한 오바마의 대외정책" 6 : 2010

    10 이삼성, "미국의 신보수주의 외교이념과 민주주의: 현실주의와 도덕철학의 한 결합양식" 세종연구소 11 (11): 2005

    1 이삼성, "현대 미국외교와 국제정치" 한길사 1993

    2 임민혁, "지금 남북정상회담이 현실적인가는 미국 아닌 청와대가 답해야 할 일"

    3 김재천, "오바마 행정부의 출범과 미국의 대 한반도 안보정책 함의" 미국학연구소 32 (32): 145-168, 2009

    4 안병준, "오바마 행정부의 외교정책과 한반도의 미래" (91) : 2009

    5 이춘근, "오바마 행정부의 외교안보 정책과 한반도" 3 (3): 2008

    6 남궁곤, "오바마 행정부 국제주의 외교정책 이념의 역사적 유산과 실제" 한국국제정치학회 50 (50): 91-118, 2010

    7 이성형, "오바마 정부와 라틴아메리카: 선린외교에서 힘의 외교로?" 한국라틴아메리카학회 23 (23): 43-82, 2010

    8 이삼성, "세계와 미국: 20세기의 반성과 21세기의 전망" 한길사 2001

    9 헌트, 마이클 H., "변화보다는 답습을 택한 오바마의 대외정책" 6 : 2010

    10 이삼성, "미국의 신보수주의 외교이념과 민주주의: 현실주의와 도덕철학의 한 결합양식" 세종연구소 11 (11): 2005

    11 김기정, "미국 외교의 이념적 원형, in 미국외교정책: 이론과 실제" 박영사 2001

    12 고봉준, "경제위기와 미국 대외정책 패러다임의 변화: 현실주의 이론의 관점에서" 한국사회과학연구회 (76) : 41-75, 2009

    13 Brown, John, "What’s happened to anti-Americanism, and to the State Department? The Obama administration and public diplomacy: March to Mid-June 2009" 5 (5): 2009

    14 Waltz, Kenneth N., "Theory of International Politics" Addison-Wesley 1979

    15 Carr, E. H., "The Twenty Years’Crisis, 1919-1939, Second Edition" Macmillan 1946

    16 Mearsheimer, John J., "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics" Norton 2001

    17 Keohane, Robert O., "The Promise of Institutionalist Theory" 20 (20): 1995

    18 Bull, Hedley, "The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, Third Edition" Columbia University Press 2002

    19 Wight, Martin, "Systems of States" Leicester University Press 1977

    20 Reynolds, David, "Summits: Six Meetingsthat Shaped the Twentieth Century" Allen Lane 2007

    21 Gates, Robert, "Speech at Notre Dame University, Notre Dame, Indiana"

    22 Wendt, Alexander, "Social Theory of International Relations" Cambridge University Press 1999

    23 Morgenthau, Hans J., "Scientific Man Versus Power Politics" University of Chicago Press 1946

    24 Obama, Barack, "Rmarks by the President to the Ghanaian Parliament, Accra International Conference Center, Accra, Ghana. 11 July 2009"

    25 Obama, Barack, "Remarks at the Summit of the Americas Opening Ceremony, Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago. 17 April 2009"

    26 Keohane, Robert O., "Realism, Neorealism and the Study of World Politics, in Neorealism and Its Critics" Columbia University Press 1986

    27 Wolfowitz, Paul, "Realism" 174 : 2009

    28 U.S. Department of Defense, "Quadrennial Defense Review Report" 2010

    29 Snyder, Jack, "One World, Rival Theories" 145 : 2004

    30 Nau, Henry R., "Obama’s Foreign Policy" 160 : 2010

    31 The White House, "National Security Strategy"

    32 U.S. Department of the State, "Leading Through Civilian Power: The First Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review"

    33 Bull, Hedley, "Introduction, in The Expansion of International Society" Oxford University Press 1984

    34 Skidmore, David, "Introduction, in Paradoxes of Power: U.S. Foreign Policy in a Changing World World" Paradigm Publishers 2007

    35 Obama, Barack, "Inaugural Address. 20 January 2009"

    36 Hunt, Michael H., "Ideology and U.S. Foreign Policy" Yale University Press 1987

    37 Buzan, Barry, "From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School" 47 (47): 1993

    38 Brzezinski, Zbigniew, "From Hope to Audacity: Appraising Obama’s Foreign Policy" 89 (89): 2010

    39 Helleiner, Eric, "Explaining the Globalization of Financial Markets: Bringing States Back In" 2 (2): 1995

    40 Krauthamer, Charles, "Democratic Realism: An American Foreign Policy for a Unipolar World, in Paradoxes of Power: U.S. Foreign Policy in a Changing World World" Paradigm Publishers 2007

    41 Maynes, Charles, "Contending Schools" 63 : 2001

    42 Kissinger, Henry A., "Bureaucracy and Policymaking: The Effects of Insiders and Outsiders on the Policy Process, in Readings in American Foreign Policy: A Bureaucratic Perspective" Little Brown 1973

    43 Holsti, Ole R., "American Leadership in World Affairs: Vietnam and the Breakdown of the Consensus" Allen & Unwin 1984

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2018-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-03-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of International Studies -> Korean Journal of International Relations KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2010-12-01 등재 학술지 분리 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2010-06-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of International Relations -> The Korean Journal of International Studies KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.91 0.91 1.12
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.07 1.09 1.415 0.17
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼