자본시장법상 분쟁해결제도(ADR)의 편면적 구속력 부여에 관한 검토

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

A number of laws of Korea including the Financial Investment Services and Capital Market Act (the “Capital Market Act”) have provisions on financial ADR. Experts point out, however, that the current Capital Market Act has shown limitations in that decisions made by arbitration institutions authorized by the Capital Market Act have had no binding power over respondents. Such limitations stem from the right to file suits granted by Article 27 of the Constitution of Korea therefore, in order for financial ADR to be adopted effectively and have some degree of binding power over respondents, it should be made clear that there is no violation of Article 27 of the Constitution, which acknowledges that all Korean citizens have the right to file suits.
In the case of Japan the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law, which is similar to Korea"s Capital Market Act, is currently effective, but the decision to introduce financial ADR into its financial system could not be made until 2009 because of Article 37 of its Constitution, which is similar to Article 27 of Korea"s Constitution, even though there had been many years of debate.(1) With a revision of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law that ended any issue over its constitutionality, financial ADR was able to be introduced formally as part of the country"s financial system in the 171th Diet session of 2009.
This paper looks at the right to file suit as acknowledged by Korea"s Constitution and the key elements and limitations on the binding power of financial ADR as referred to by Korea"s Capital Market Act, and finally it explores schemes to both allow nonreciprocal binding power for ADR and resolve the constitutionality issue of ADR. To find solutions it also examines Japan"s Financial Products Trade Law and Britain"s Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000. Part II of the essay focuses on the right to file suit under the Constitution, which includes the meaning and legal nature of the right to file criminal suits, the right of financial investors to file suits, and utilization of the appeal system in civil cases, overriding any “agree-not-tofile- suit-in-any-cases” agreements. Part III overviews the elements of dispute resolution under the Capital Market Act and explores the issue on whether to acknowledge its possession of nonreciprocal binding power by looking at cases of dispute resolution involving the Korea Exchange and the Korea Financial Investment Association and their legal effects. Part IV discusses legislative tactics to grant nonreciprocal binding power for ADR as employed by Japan"s Financial Instruments and Exchange Law and Britain"s Financial Services and Markets Act. Part V lists legislative schemes. The author makes suggestions and concludes that further study needs to be made in order to establish fairer principles and to find better solutions.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서설
• Ⅱ. 헌법상 재판청구권
• Ⅲ. 자본시장법상 분쟁해결제도 및 편면적 구속력의 인정여부
• Ⅳ. 편면적 구속력 인정의 입법례
• Ⅴ. 입법방안: 맺음말에 갈음하며
• 參考文獻
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정종섭, "헌법학원론" 박영사 2010

2 김철수, "헌법학개론" 박영사 1997

3 최승필, "행정법상 재판외분쟁해결제도(ADR)에 대한 고찰 - 조정(調停)제도를 중심으로 -" 한국비교공법학회 11 (11): 325-354, 2010

4 문광삼, "한국헌법학" 삼영사 2010

5 김건식, "증권거래법,제4판" 두성사 2006

6 한국증권법학회, "자본시장법주석서 Ⅱ" 박영사 2009

7 오성근, "일본 금융상품거래법상 금융ADR의 특징과 지정분쟁해결기관" 한국경제법학회 10 (10): 91-123, 2011

8 유병현, "우리나라 ADR의 발전방향" 안암법학회 (22) : 2006

9 김선정, "영국에 있어서 금융옴브즈만 제도의 전개와 장래" 한국경영법률학회 21 (21): 465-508, 2011

10 김상겸, "법치국가의 요소로서 절차적 기본권" 아세아ㆍ태평양공법연구 7 : 2000

11 장석조, "민사소송에 있어서의 사법행위 청구권: 민사소송에 있어서의 재판청구권" 한국사법행정학회 2 : 1999

12 이시윤, "민사소송법 전정판" 박영사 1987

13 송상현, "민사소송법 신정5판" 박영사 2008

14 김춘, "금융분쟁조정제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구 －영국의 금융옴부즈맨제도와 우리나라에 대한 시사점－" 한국증권법학회 11 (11): 135-174, 2010

15 김상수, "금융분쟁과 ADR ―한일 비교를 중심으로―" 한국금융법학회 7 (7): 145-170, 2010

16 맹수석, "금융거래에 있어서 투자자 분쟁해결제도의법적 쟁점" 한국증권법학회 11 (11): 175-212, 2010

17 한창희, "고지의무의 입법적 연혁과 최근동향" 한국상사법학회 28 (28): 135-185, 2010

18 金融庁, "金融審議会答申ー21世紀を支える金融の新しい枠組みについて"

19 川村正幸, "金融商品取引法 第3版" 中央経済社 2010

20 中沢則夫, "金融分野における裁判外紛争解決制度(金融ADR)の概要" 商事法務研究会 (1876) : 2009

21 金融庁, "金融分野における裁判外紛争解決制度(金融ADR)のあり方について" 金融審議会金融分科会 2008

22 金融庁, "金融分野における裁判外の苦情ㆍ紛争解決支援制度(金融ADR)の整備にかかる今後の課題について(座長メモ)" 金融トラブル連絡調整協議会 2008

23 山本和彦, "金融ADRの意義とその可能性" 金融財政事情研究会 (1887) : 2010

24 岸田雅雄, "注釈金融商品取引法" 金融財政事情研究会 2010

25 "Review of Compensation Scheme and Ombudsman Services limits and miscellaneous amendments to the Compensation Sourcebook"

26 Deborah A, Sabalot, "Financial Services and Markets Act 2000" LexisNexis Butterworths 2004

27 Michael Blair QC, "Financial Services Law, 2nd ed" OUP 2009

28 Joanna Benjamin, "Financial Law" OUP 2007

29 사법연수원, "ADR(판결 이외의 분쟁해결)"