RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    홍콩의 도시재생을 위한 공공의 역할 및 재정지원제도 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60141929

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The Hong Kong Government established the role of public sector as the social and economic level has changed regarding to the development of city regeneration strategies. Throughout the creation of new performing organizations, it facilitated various subsidies and its related policies while the residents and regional characteristics are highly considered. As this importance of integrative regeneration policies is becoming the main issue of society, however, the central government still finds difficulties in getting solutions to overcome the lack of specific funding policies and supportive authorities. Therefore, this research reveals to define domestic implications by reviewing the Government"s Roles and the Grant Programs of Urban Regeneration policies in Hong Kong.
    As the result of the analysis, firstly, the Hong Kong government established URA under the urban regeneration agency of the central government. The expansion of its organization for effective practices can be implied into current domestic position but it is important to acquire positive advantages of existing institutions which aims to inform current services or further developments of policies. Secondly, by taking the consideration of residents and local characteristics into serious account, the government"s sustainable regeneration will be in progress. Thirdly, they need the Government"s supporting system to encourage residents" participation and the role and responsibilities of the Government to Compensation and Immigration. Lastly, The organizations need to diverge from the limited guidelines and create new perspectives towards Urban Regeneration policies which claim the importance of integration between businesses, substantial strategies and nature of the systems.
    번역하기

    The Hong Kong Government established the role of public sector as the social and economic level has changed regarding to the development of city regeneration strategies. Throughout the creation of new performing organizations, it facilitated various s...

    The Hong Kong Government established the role of public sector as the social and economic level has changed regarding to the development of city regeneration strategies. Throughout the creation of new performing organizations, it facilitated various subsidies and its related policies while the residents and regional characteristics are highly considered. As this importance of integrative regeneration policies is becoming the main issue of society, however, the central government still finds difficulties in getting solutions to overcome the lack of specific funding policies and supportive authorities. Therefore, this research reveals to define domestic implications by reviewing the Government"s Roles and the Grant Programs of Urban Regeneration policies in Hong Kong.
    As the result of the analysis, firstly, the Hong Kong government established URA under the urban regeneration agency of the central government. The expansion of its organization for effective practices can be implied into current domestic position but it is important to acquire positive advantages of existing institutions which aims to inform current services or further developments of policies. Secondly, by taking the consideration of residents and local characteristics into serious account, the government"s sustainable regeneration will be in progress. Thirdly, they need the Government"s supporting system to encourage residents" participation and the role and responsibilities of the Government to Compensation and Immigration. Lastly, The organizations need to diverge from the limited guidelines and create new perspectives towards Urban Regeneration policies which claim the importance of integration between businesses, substantial strategies and nature of the systems.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Abstract
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 선행연구 고찰
    • 3. 홍콩의 도시재생 정책의 추진배경 및 패러다임의 변화
    • 4. 홍콩의 도시재생 추진주체 및 지원체계
    • Abstract
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 선행연구 고찰
    • 3. 홍콩의 도시재생 정책의 추진배경 및 패러다임의 변화
    • 4. 홍콩의 도시재생 추진주체 및 지원체계
    • 5. ‘개량(Rehabilitation)’을 위한 공공의 지원
    • 6. 결론
    • 참고문헌
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박세훈, "홍콩의도시재생정책과도시재생기구URA)역U할" (22) : 80-87, 2008

    2 박천보, "해외 도심재생의 정책 및 제도에 관한 연구" 대한국토·도시계획학회 39 (39): 25-38, 2004

    3 김영환, "성장관리형 도심재생의 기본전략 및 계획요소" 대한국토·도시계획학회 38 (38): 85-97, 2003

    4 주택도시연구원, "선진국의주택도시정책과공공기관의구조및역할변화"

    5 한국도시연구소, "리퉁스트리트재개발사업과홍콩도시재생정책의변화" (90) : 2011

    6 시정개발연구원, "도시재생정책의국제비교연구: 영:국과일본을중심으로" 2006

    7 Adams, D, "Urban renewal in Hong Kong: transition from development corporation to renewal authority" 18 (18): 245-258, 2001

    8 Development Bureau, "Urban Renewal Strategy"

    9 "Urban Renewal Authority(URA)"

    10 HKSAR Department of Justice, "Urban Renewal Authority Ordinance"

    1 박세훈, "홍콩의도시재생정책과도시재생기구URA)역U할" (22) : 80-87, 2008

    2 박천보, "해외 도심재생의 정책 및 제도에 관한 연구" 대한국토·도시계획학회 39 (39): 25-38, 2004

    3 김영환, "성장관리형 도심재생의 기본전략 및 계획요소" 대한국토·도시계획학회 38 (38): 85-97, 2003

    4 주택도시연구원, "선진국의주택도시정책과공공기관의구조및역할변화"

    5 한국도시연구소, "리퉁스트리트재개발사업과홍콩도시재생정책의변화" (90) : 2011

    6 시정개발연구원, "도시재생정책의국제비교연구: 영:국과일본을중심으로" 2006

    7 Adams, D, "Urban renewal in Hong Kong: transition from development corporation to renewal authority" 18 (18): 245-258, 2001

    8 Development Bureau, "Urban Renewal Strategy"

    9 "Urban Renewal Authority(URA)"

    10 HKSAR Department of Justice, "Urban Renewal Authority Ordinance"

    11 Urban Renewal Authority, "Urban Renewal : The past 20 years 1988-2008"

    12 Gerner, "Urban Design and the Better Cities Program, the influence of Urban Design on the Outcomes of Program" Hong Kong Univ 2002

    13 Lai, C, "Treating the Symptoms _ A Critical Review of Urban Renewal in Hong Kong"

    14 Hong Kong Univ, "The Achievements and Challenges of Urban Renewal in Hong Kong"

    15 Law, W. W. Y, "Sustainable Urban Regeneration and Social Impact Assessment: A Case Study of Hong Kong"

    16 "Skyscrapercity Forum"

    17 "HKSAR Planning Department"

    18 HKSAR, "Development Bureau"

    19 "Department of Justice"

    20 Vicki, Been, "Community Benefits Agreements : New Local Government Tool or Another Variation on the Exaction Theme" The University of Chicago Law Review 2010

    21 Urban Renewal Authority, "Annual Report 2009"

    22 도시재생사업단, "1-3핵3심: 쇠:퇴도시유형별재생기법및지원체계개발"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.9 0.9 0.9
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.85 0.87 1.157 0.18
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼