원자력 발전소와 방폐장 낙인의 심리적 모형: 신뢰와 감정, 지식을 중심으로 = Psychological model of stigma on nuclear power plants and radioactive waste repositories: Focusing on trust, affect, and knowledge

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Nuclear power plants and radioactive waste repositories are stigmatized as risky facilities by lay people. This study examined a new model that social trust, rather than negative emotion in the stigma susceptibility model(Peters, Burraston & Mertz, 2004), would have a pivotal role in stigma response of radioactive source technologies. Results of structural equation modeling indicate that trust in governmental agencies was important in stigma responses of radioactive source technologies. In both cases of nuclear power plants and radioactive waste repositories, trust had the direct influence on the stigma responses. Stigma responses were influenced by the perceptions of risk and benefit directly, and by trust indirectly. Risk and benefit perceptions were linked with trust directly and indirectly via affect of the technologies, but not via knowledge. The perceptions of risk and benefit were influenced indirectly via trust by the worldview of people. Negative reactivity had influence on the risk perception without the mediation of the affect on the technologies. Findings of this study imply the importance of trust in laypeople's perception on the radioactive source technologies.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

일반인은 원자력 발전소와 방사성 폐기물 처리장을 위험한 시설로 낙인을 찍는다. 본 연구는 부정적 정서를 강조하는 낙인모형(Peters, Burraston, & Mertz, 2004)과 달리, 방사능 관리기관에 대한 신뢰변수를 중심으로 낙인반응에 영향을 주는 여러 심리적 요인들의 관계를 구조모형을 통해 검증하였다. 밝혀진 결과는 다음과 같다. 방사능 관련 과학기술 낙인에서 신뢰는 핵심적 역할을 한다. 원자력 발전소와 방사성 폐기물 처리장 모두에서 관리기관 신뢰는 낙인에 직접 영향을 줄 뿐 아니라 위험지각과 이익지각을 통해 간접적으로 영향을 주었다. 신뢰는 방사능 과학기술에 대한 감정을 매개로 하여 위험지각과 이익지각에 간접적인 영향을 주었으나 지식을 매개로 하지는 않았다. 개인변수인 세계관은 신뢰를 통해 위험지각과 이익지각에 영향을 주었다. 부정적 감정반응성은 방사능 과학기술에 대한 감정을 매개로 하지 않고 위험지각에 직접 영향을 주었다. 이 결과는 방사능 과학기술에 관한 일반인의 인식에서 신뢰의 중요성을 일깨워준다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김교헌, "한국판 행동활성화 및 행동억제 체계(BAS/BIS) 척도" 6 : 19-37, 2001

2 한국경제, "주민투표로 ‘19년 숙제’ 풀었다...경주 방폐장 유치 확정. 한국경제"

3 김서용, "정책과정에서 전문가의 중립성에 대한 실증분석: 문화이론과 Q방법론의 적용을 통해" 한국행정학회 40 (40): 127-153, 2006

4 이영애, "위험판단 심리학" 시그마프레스 2008

5 이나경, "세계관과 위험지각에서 전문가와 일반인의 차이: 문화이론 다시보기" 한국심리학회 27 (27): 635-651, 2008

6 이나경, "방폐장 입지에 관한 의사결정에 영향을 미치는 변수" 한국인지및생물심리학회 17 (17): 461-475, 2005

7 홍세희, "구조방정식 모형. 고급연구방법론 워크샵 시리즈" S&M Research Group 2010

8 이현주, "과학기술의 위험 및 이득 지각에서 감정추단" 한국인지과학회 18 (18): 305-324, 2007

9 Earle, T., "Trust, risk perception and the TCC model of cooperation, in Trust in Risk Management" Earthscan Publications 1-50, 2010

10 Eiser, J. R, "Trust, perceived risk and attitudes toward food technologies" 32 : 2423-2433, 2002

11 Poortinga, W, "Trust in risk regulation: Cause or consequence of the acceptability of GM food" 25 : 197-207, 2005

12 Earle,T.C, "Trust in risk management" 30 : 541-574, 2010

13 Flynn, J, "Trust as a determinant of opposition to a high-level radioactive waste repository: Analysis of a structural model" 12 : 417-429, 1992

14 Little, T. D, "To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits" 9 : 151-173, 2002

15 Dake, K, "Theories of risk perception: Who fears what and why" 199 : 41-60, 1990

16 Kasperson, R. E, "The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework" 8 : 177-187, 1988

17 Midden, C. J. H, "The role of trust in the affective evaluation of novel risks: The case of CO2 storage" 29 : 743-751, 2009

18 Peters, E., "The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power" 26 (26): 1427-1453, 1996

19 Tucker, L, "The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis" 38 : 1-10, 1973

20 Finucane, M. L, "The affect heuristic in judgments of risk and benefits" 13 : 1-17, 2000

21 Gregory, R, "Technological stigma" 83 : 224-223, 1995

22 Siegrist, M, "Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception" 20 : 353-362, 2000

23 Slovic, P, "Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality" 24 : 311-322, 2004

24 Douglas, M, "Risk and culture" University of California Press 1982

25 Frijda, N. H, "Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness" 57 : 212-228, 1989

26 Lazarus,R.S, "Relational meaning and discrete emotions, in Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research" Oxford University Press 37-67, 2001

27 Siegrist, M, "Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: The influence of affect and trust" 49 : 459-466, 2007

28 Larsen, R. J, "Personality and Susceptibility to Positive and Negative Emotional States" 61 : 132-140, 1991

29 Siegrist,M, "Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge" 20 : 713-720, 2000

30 Siegrist, M., "Perception of hazard: The role of social trust and knowledge" 20 : 713-719, 2000

31 Slovic,P, "Perceived risk, trust, and democracy" 13 : 675-682, 1993

32 Slovic, P., "Perceived risk, stigma and potential economic impacts of a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada" 11 : 683-696, 1991

33 Smith, C. A, "Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion" 48 : 813-838, 1985

34 Dake,K, "Orienting dispositions in the perception of risk: An analysis of contemporary worldviews and cultural biases" 22 : 61-82, 1991

35 Dake,K, "Myths of nature: Culture and the social construction of risk" 48 : 21-27, 1992

36 Fischhoff, B, "How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits" 127-152, 1978

37 Connor, M., "Factors Influencing People’s Acceptance of Gene Technology: The Role of Knowledge, Health Expectations, Naturalness, and Social Trust" 32 : 514-538, 2010

38 Scherer,K.R, "Emotion as a multicomponent process: A model and some cross-cultural data" 5 : 37-63, 1984

39 Katsuya,T, "Difference in th formation of attitude toward nuclear power" 23 : 191-203, 2002

40 Fischhoff, B, "Defining stigma, in Risk Media & Stigma" Earthscan Publications 361-368, 2001

41 Hu, L., "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives" 6 : 1-55, 1999

42 Bentler,P, "Comparative fit indexes in structural models" 107 : 238-246, 1990

43 Karasawa,K, "Cognitive antecedents of emotions: Findings and future direction" 37 : 40-55, 1995

44 Carver, C. S., "Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales" 67 : 319-333, 1994

45 Peters, E, "An emotional-based model of risk perception and stigma susceptibility: Cognitive appraisal of emotion, affective reactivity, worldviews, and risk perceptions in the generation of technological stigma" 24 : 1349-1367, 2004

46 배병렬, "Amos 17.0 구조방정식모델링: 원리와 실제" 청람 2009

47 Alhakami, A., "A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit" 14 : 1085-1096, 1994

48 Gray,J.A, "A critique of Eysenck's theory of personality, in A Model of Personality" Springer 246-276, 1981

49 Siegrist,M, "A causal model of explaining the acceptance of gene technology" 29 : 2093-2106, 1999