개인의 감정적 평온에 관한 불법행위 = 불법행위의 유형과 성립요건을 중심으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In these days, the advancement of information technology as well as complication or diversification of the society often entails cases that infringes on the emotional peace of others through the daily life, whether with intention or negligence.
In the past the emotional peace of an individual has not been conceived as an independent subject for protection but rather protected as an accessory to other exclusive rights. However, the recent change of society has led us to a situation where not only an objective value of an individual like honor is to be protected, but also the emotional peace of an individual is encouraged to be the subject of protection.
And yet, since article 750 of the Civil Code is only introducing a liability system for general torts, the question on which particular case may the emotional peace of an individual could be protected under the existing torts system remains unclear. Also, it must be said that its specific forms and requirements under which may be treated as of torts are mainly defined by the case law.
In relation to the above issue, it is clear that the privacy torts is being covered by article 17 of the Constitutional Law, but still the specific forms and requirements within the civil context is obscure. In particular, the question on whether it is possible to protect the emotional peace of an individual itself or not is unclear, and though in the U.S. certain forms of this kind of torts is generally accepted, its concept is still developing and its ultimate limit has not been decided. Therefore, in this study the author suggests the specific forms and requirements which lead to torts that infringes on the emotional peace of an individual, with an end to cope with torts that violates the individual’s emotional peace in an appropriate way, by referring to relevant legislation and case law of other States.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 개인의 감정적 평온에 관한 외국의 동향
• Ⅲ. 개인의 감정적 평온에 관한 불법행위의 유형과 성립요건
• Ⅳ. 결론
• 【참고문헌】
• 【Zusammenfassung】

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 곽윤직, "채권각론" 박영사 2000

2 김형배, "채권각론" 박영사 2001

3 이은영, "채권각론" 박영사 2005

4 양창수, "정보화사회와 프라이버시의 보호" 박영사 1 : 1991

5 성낙인, "언론정보법" 나남출판사 1998

6 전원열, "언론에 의한 명예훼손과 프라이버시 침해의 비교" 13 (13): 2005

7 류일상, "언론법제론" 박영사 2000

8 양창수, "사생활 비밀의 보호 －사법적 측면을 중심으로－" 2003

9 한위수, "사생활 비밀의 보호 －그 공법적 측면－" 2003

10 민의원 법제사법위원회 민법안심의소위원회, "민법안심의록"

11 정재훈, "민간부문에서의 정보프라이버시권" 한국정보법학회 (2) : 1988

12 염규호, "미국의 프라이버시 침해와 언론의 자유" 겨울호 1995

13 조규범, "미국의 프라이버시 법제에 관한 연구" 법학연구소 17 (17): 75-114, 2005

14 前田達明, "權利侵害と違法性" 日本評論社 1998

15 のこみ綜合法律事務所(編), "新?名譽毁損" 商事法務 2006

16 松井茂記, "名譽毁損と表現の自由" 日本評論社 1998

17 Prosser, "privacy" 48 : 1960

18 Samuel D. Warren, "The Right to Privacy" 4 : 1890

19 The American Law Institute, "Second Restatement of Torts" American Law Institute Publishers 1965-1977,

20 Martin Stone, "On the Idea of Private Law" Canadian Journal of law and Jurispudence 1996

21 Margruder, "Mental and Emotional and Disturbance in the Laws of Torts" 1033 (1033): 1936

22 Harvey L, Zuckman, "MODERN COMMUNICATION LAW" Minn. 1999

23 Kent D. Stuckey, "Internet and Law" Law Journal Seminar-Press 2000

24 Jerry Kang, "Information Privacy in Cyberspace Transactions" 50 : 1998

25 Zweigert, "Einf?rung in die Rechtsvergleichung" T?ingen 1996

26 Hager, "Der Schutz der Ehre im Zivilrecht" AcP 1996

27 H. K?z, "Deliktsrechts"

28 Jelezny, "Communication Law" Wadworth Publishing Company 1997

29 M?chKomm-Schwerdtner, "BGB Kommentar"

30 Keeton, Prosser, "5th" Westpublishing Co. 1984