RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    조세행정서비스의 효율성 및 규모수익 평가 -한국의 징세행정서비스를 중심으로- = Evaluating the Efficiency and Returns to Scale of Tax Administration Services: With an Application to Tax Collection Service in Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82675971

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Using a bootstrap data envelopment analysis, this study measured the technical efficiency of tax administration services with an application to the tax collection service of National Tax Service in Korea from 1980 through 2009, and analyzed their scale efficiency and returns to scale. Bootstrapped bias-corrected efficiency scores showed to be 3.19% lower than traditional efficiency scores on average. The scale efficiencies of tax administration services were efficient in three years such as 1993, 1994 and 1997, while there were significant scale inefficiencies in other twenty-seven years. In particular, scale efficiencies were low for twelve years from 1980 through 1991, whereas they began to become higher from 1992, maintained high levels over 90% until 2007 and then tended to become lower. And analytical results of returns to scale show that tax administration services operated in a region of constant returns to scale in three years including 1993, 1994 and 1997, while they operated in a region of increasing returns to scale in other years. What tax administration services operate under increasing returns to scale implies that there are economies of scale in tax administration services.
    번역하기

    Using a bootstrap data envelopment analysis, this study measured the technical efficiency of tax administration services with an application to the tax collection service of National Tax Service in Korea from 1980 through 2009, and analyzed their scal...

    Using a bootstrap data envelopment analysis, this study measured the technical efficiency of tax administration services with an application to the tax collection service of National Tax Service in Korea from 1980 through 2009, and analyzed their scale efficiency and returns to scale. Bootstrapped bias-corrected efficiency scores showed to be 3.19% lower than traditional efficiency scores on average. The scale efficiencies of tax administration services were efficient in three years such as 1993, 1994 and 1997, while there were significant scale inefficiencies in other twenty-seven years. In particular, scale efficiencies were low for twelve years from 1980 through 1991, whereas they began to become higher from 1992, maintained high levels over 90% until 2007 and then tended to become lower. And analytical results of returns to scale show that tax administration services operated in a region of constant returns to scale in three years including 1993, 1994 and 1997, while they operated in a region of increasing returns to scale in other years. What tax administration services operate under increasing returns to scale implies that there are economies of scale in tax administration services.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이영범, "확률전선 비용변경모형을 이용한 병원의 효율성 측정에 관한 연구" 연세대학교 1997

    2 원구환, "확률변경생산함수를 이용한 공익사업의 비용효율성 측정" 7 (7): 287-306, 1998

    3 김동건, "현대재정학" 박영사 2007

    4 유금록, "한국과 일본의 국세행정의 효율성 비교" 한국행정학회 37 (37): 95-118, 2003

    5 현진권, "징세비 실증분석을 통한 세무행정의 효율성 및 효과성" 6 (6): 79-109, 2001

    6 유금록, "지방하수도사업의 효율성: 확률변경분석" 35 (35): 275-295, 2001

    7 오승은, "지방공영개발사업의 효율성 분석에 관한 연구" 13 (13): 125-140, 2001

    8 한국조세연구원, "주요국 국세행정개혁 사례 및 시사점" 한국조세연구원 2009

    9 현진권, "조세행정과 정책과제" 한국조세연구원 1998

    10 유금록, "조세정책의 결정요인:한국의 조세수입을 중심으로" 28 (28): 843-860, 1994

    1 이영범, "확률전선 비용변경모형을 이용한 병원의 효율성 측정에 관한 연구" 연세대학교 1997

    2 원구환, "확률변경생산함수를 이용한 공익사업의 비용효율성 측정" 7 (7): 287-306, 1998

    3 김동건, "현대재정학" 박영사 2007

    4 유금록, "한국과 일본의 국세행정의 효율성 비교" 한국행정학회 37 (37): 95-118, 2003

    5 현진권, "징세비 실증분석을 통한 세무행정의 효율성 및 효과성" 6 (6): 79-109, 2001

    6 유금록, "지방하수도사업의 효율성: 확률변경분석" 35 (35): 275-295, 2001

    7 오승은, "지방공영개발사업의 효율성 분석에 관한 연구" 13 (13): 125-140, 2001

    8 한국조세연구원, "주요국 국세행정개혁 사례 및 시사점" 한국조세연구원 2009

    9 현진권, "조세행정과 정책과제" 한국조세연구원 1998

    10 유금록, "조세정책의 결정요인:한국의 조세수입을 중심으로" 28 (28): 843-860, 1994

    11 유금록, "부트스트랩 자료포락분석에 의한 공공부문의 효율성과 결정요인의 경험적 평가: 서울시 보건소를 중심으로" 한국정책학회 17 (17): 291-321, 2008

    12 현진권, "국세행정의 생산관계 분석" 6 (6): 119-232, 2000

    13 국세청, "국세행정개혁백서" 국세청 2001

    14 국세청, "국세청40년사" 국세청 2006

    15 유금록, "공적연금제도의 관리효율성 측정" 35 (35): 49-62, 2001

    16 유금록, "공공부문의 효율성과 영향요인 분석: 도시개발공사를 중심으로" 한국행정학회 42 (42): 79-109, 2008

    17 유금록, "공공부문의 효율성 측정과 평가" 대영문화사 2004

    18 윤경준, "공공부문 성과측정을 위한 DEA와 확률전선모형의 비교분석" 32 (32): 257-273, 1998

    19 한국은행, "경제통계연보" 한국은행 2011

    20 Farrell, M. J., "The Measurement of Productive Efficiency" 120 (120): 253-290, 1957

    21 Barros, C. P., "Technical and Allocative Efficiency of Tax Offices:A Case Study" 1 (1): 41-61, 2007

    22 Jha, R., "Tax Efficiency in Selected Indian States" 24 : 641-654, 1999

    23 Jha, R., "Tax Efficiency and Productivity Analysis:The Case of Canadian Fiscal Federalism" 52 (52): 186-197, 1997

    24 Simar, L., "Statistical Inference in Nonparametric Frontier Models: The State of the Art" 13 : 49-78, 2000

    25 Simar, L., "Some Problems with the Ferrier/ Hirschberg Bootstrap Idea" 11 : 67-80, 1999

    26 Thirtle, C., "Size Does Matter:Technical and Scale Efficiency in Indian State Tax Jurisdictions" 4 (4): 340-352, 2001

    27 Tortosa-Ausina, E., "Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency and Malmquist Productivity Indices:An Application to Spanish Savings Banks" 184 : 1062-1084, 2008

    28 Simar, L., "Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores:How to Bootstrap in Nonparametric Frontier Models" 44 (44): 49-61, 1998

    29 Lovell, C. A. K, "Production Frontiers and Productive Efficiency, in The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications" Oxford University Press 3-67, 1993

    30 Hyun, J. K., "Production Analysis of Tax Administration with Multiple Outputs:The Case of Korea" Korea Institute of Public Finance 2001

    31 Barros, C. P., "Performance Measurement in Tax Offices with a Stochastic Frontier Model" 32 (32): 497-510, 2005

    32 Hall, P., "On the Number of Bootstrap Simulations Required to Construct a Confidence Interval" 14 : 1453-1462, 1986

    33 Simar, L., "Of Course We Can Bootstrap DEA Scores! But Does It Mean Anything? Logic Trumps Wishful Thinking" 11 : 93-97, 1999

    34 Curi, C., "New Evidence on the Efficiency of Italian Airports: A Bootstrapped DEA Analysis" 45 : 84-93, 2011

    35 Banker, R. D., "Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Efficiencies" 30 : 1078-1092, 1984

    36 Charnes, A., "Measuring Efficiency of Decision Making Units" 1 : 429-444, 1978

    37 Sueyoshi, T., "Measuring Efficiencies and Returns to Scale of Nippon Telegraph & Telephone in Production and Cost Analyses" 43 : 779-796, 1997

    38 Tone, K., "Evaluating Cost Efficiency and Returns to Scale in the Life Insurance Corporation of India Using Data Envelopment Analysis" 39 : 261-285, 2005

    39 Simar, L., "Estimation and Inference in Two-Stage,Semi-Parametric Models of Production Processes" 136 : 31-64, 2007

    40 Simar, L., "Estimating and Bootstrapping Malmquist Indices" 115 : 459-471, 1999

    41 Banker, R. D., "Estimating Most Productive Scale Size Using Data Envelopment Analysis" 17 : 35-44, 1984

    42 Simar, L., "Estimating Efficiencies from Frontier Models with Panel Data:A Comparison of Parametric,Non-Parametric and Semi-Parametric Methods with Bootstrapping" 3 : 167-203, 1992

    43 Silverman, B. W., "Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis" Chapman and Hall 1986

    44 Ray, S. C., "Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory and Techniques in Economics and Operations Research" Cambridge University Press 2004

    45 Cooper, W. W., "Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software. Second Edition" Springer 2007

    46 Sueyoshi, T., "DEA Duality on Returns to Scale(RTS)in Production and Cost Analyses:An Occurrence of Multiple Solutions and Differences between Production-Based and Cost-Based RTS Estimates" 45 : 1593-1608, 1999

    47 Ray, S. C., "Cost Efficiency in the US Steel Industry:A Nonparametric Analysis Using Data Envelopment Analysis" 80 : 654-671, 2005

    48 Ferrier, G. D., "Can We Bootstrap DEA Scores" 11 : 81-92, 1999

    49 Ferrier, G. D., "Bootstrapping Confidence Intervals for Linear Programming Efficiency Scores:With an Illustration Using Italian Banking Data" 8 : 19-33, 1997

    50 Assaf, A., "Bootstrapped Scale Efficiency Measures of UK Airports" 16 : 42-44, 2010

    51 Efron, B., "Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife" 7 : 1-26, 1979

    52 MacKinnon, J. G, "Bootstrap Hypothesis Testing, in Handbook of Computational Econometrics" John Wiley & Sons 2009

    53 Boussofiane, A., "Applied Data Envelopment Analysis" 52 : 1-15, 1991

    54 Efron, B., "An Introduction to the Bootstrap" Chapman and Hall 1993

    55 Coelli, T. J., "An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis" Springer 2005

    56 Hunter, W. J., "An IRS Production Function" 49 (49): 105-115, 1996

    57 국세청, "2010 국세통계연보" 국세청 2010

    58 국세청, "2009 국세통계연보" 국세청 2009

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2018-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.69 1.69 1.76
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.83 1.8 1.759 0.69
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼