This study empirically analyzed the influence of government sponsored R&D and entry regulation on the industrial productivity based on panel data of 23 Korean manufacturing industries from 1992 to 2006. The empirical results show that industrial polic...
This study empirically analyzed the influence of government sponsored R&D and entry regulation on the industrial productivity based on panel data of 23 Korean manufacturing industries from 1992 to 2006. The empirical results show that industrial policy through public R&D and entry regulation is effective and have differential effect according to the industrial characteristics. The main findings are as follow. First, we have seen that public R&D had inducement effect on private R&D, depending on industrial characteristics. The result implies that public R&D and private R&D are complements. The inducement effect is significant when the level of competition is fierce within industries due to low market concentration, low capital-labor ratio or high import to sales ratio. Second, public R&D does not have direct effect on industry productivity. However, the public R&D plays an essential indirect role in increasing the industry productivity growth by inducing private R&D which in turn has a strong influence on productivity growth. Third, the role of entry regulation as an instrument of industrial policy was found to be different from the public R&D. There was little evidence that entry regulation has private R&D inducement effect. However, the entry regulations lead to significant reduction in productivity growth when they are imposed on the industries with low market concentration or with low capital-labor ratio. This study has a policy implication that it is essential to consider industrial characteristics when implementing industrial policy through expansion of public R&D and reduction of regulations. Furthermore, the new industrial policy to lead the country to advanced developmental stage has to be harmonious and synchro-nous with the competition policy.