RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    연구개발팀의 다양성과 응집성이 팀 창의성에 미치는 영향

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82674598

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Team diversity and cohesion can have conflicting effects on performance like a double-edged sword. In other words, diversity and cohesion can have both positive and negative impact on performance. An organization has to manage diversity and cohesion effectively in order to ensure that they produce a desirable outcome, and the primary responsibility for that falls on a team leader. This study has focused on team leader’s function as a creative role model that enhances team creativity as one of the situational factors
    This study has targeted a R&D team in a R&D organization of a large domestic corporation to look into the effects team diversity and cohesion have on team creativity and the moderating effects of leadership function as a creative role model in relationship between team diversity and cohesion, and team creativity. The results show that team diversity has a positive impact on team creativity, whereas team cohesion has no significant impact on team creativity. The analysis of moderating effect indicates that leader’s function as a creative role model further reinforces the positive relationship between team diversity and team creativity. It is also found that the interaction between team cohesion and leadership function as a creative role model boosts team creativity. Lastly, the study also has explored theoretical and practical implications and the limitations of this research as well as the future directions of research.
    번역하기

    Team diversity and cohesion can have conflicting effects on performance like a double-edged sword. In other words, diversity and cohesion can have both positive and negative impact on performance. An organization has to manage diversity and cohesion e...

    Team diversity and cohesion can have conflicting effects on performance like a double-edged sword. In other words, diversity and cohesion can have both positive and negative impact on performance. An organization has to manage diversity and cohesion effectively in order to ensure that they produce a desirable outcome, and the primary responsibility for that falls on a team leader. This study has focused on team leader’s function as a creative role model that enhances team creativity as one of the situational factors
    This study has targeted a R&D team in a R&D organization of a large domestic corporation to look into the effects team diversity and cohesion have on team creativity and the moderating effects of leadership function as a creative role model in relationship between team diversity and cohesion, and team creativity. The results show that team diversity has a positive impact on team creativity, whereas team cohesion has no significant impact on team creativity. The analysis of moderating effect indicates that leader’s function as a creative role model further reinforces the positive relationship between team diversity and team creativity. It is also found that the interaction between team cohesion and leadership function as a creative role model boosts team creativity. Lastly, the study also has explored theoretical and practical implications and the limitations of this research as well as the future directions of research.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 최종인, "집단 창의성의 결정요인에 관한 연구" 고려대학교 1995

    2 연구개발활동조사, "교육과학기술부 & 한국과학기술기획평가원"

    3 Boyett, J.H., "Workplace 2000: The revolution reshaping americanbusiness" Dutton 1991

    4 Knouse, S.B., "Workforce diversity and TQM , In Human Resources Management Perspectives on TQM: Concepts and Practices" American Society for Quality Control Press 1996

    5 Cummings, T.G, "Worker reactions to autonomous work groups: Conditions for functioning, differential effects, and individual differences" 7 : 87-100, 1977

    6 Sundstrom, E, "Work teams: Applications andeffectiveness" 45 (45): 120-133, 1990

    7 Sundstrom,E, "Work teams" 45 : 120-133, 1990

    8 Jehn, K.A, "Why differences make a difference:A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups" 44 (44): 741-763, 1999

    9 Zhou,J, "When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: Roleof supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creativepersonality" 88 (88): 413-422, 2003

    10 Kanter,E, "When a thousand flowers bloom: structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization" 10 : 169-211, 1988

    1 최종인, "집단 창의성의 결정요인에 관한 연구" 고려대학교 1995

    2 연구개발활동조사, "교육과학기술부 & 한국과학기술기획평가원"

    3 Boyett, J.H., "Workplace 2000: The revolution reshaping americanbusiness" Dutton 1991

    4 Knouse, S.B., "Workforce diversity and TQM , In Human Resources Management Perspectives on TQM: Concepts and Practices" American Society for Quality Control Press 1996

    5 Cummings, T.G, "Worker reactions to autonomous work groups: Conditions for functioning, differential effects, and individual differences" 7 : 87-100, 1977

    6 Sundstrom, E, "Work teams: Applications andeffectiveness" 45 (45): 120-133, 1990

    7 Sundstrom,E, "Work teams" 45 : 120-133, 1990

    8 Jehn, K.A, "Why differences make a difference:A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups" 44 (44): 741-763, 1999

    9 Zhou,J, "When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: Roleof supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creativepersonality" 88 (88): 413-422, 2003

    10 Kanter,E, "When a thousand flowers bloom: structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization" 10 : 169-211, 1988

    11 Leonard, D, "When Sparks Fly: Igniting Creativity in Groups" Harvard Business School Press 1999

    12 Janis,I, "Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policydecisions and fiascoes" Houghton Mifflin 1972

    13 McGrath, J.E, "Traits, expectations, culture, andclout: the dynamics of diversity in work groups, In Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changingworkplace" American Psychological Association 1995

    14 Woodman, R.W, "Toward a theory of organizational creativity" 18 : 293-332, 1993

    15 Huszczo,G.E, "Tools for team excellence: Getting your team in high gear andkeeping it there" Davies-Black Publishing 1996

    16 Mumford, M.D, "Thinking creatively atwork: organizational influences on creative problem-solving" 31 : 7-17, 1997

    17 Moorhead, G., "The tendency toward defectivedecision making within self-managing teams: The relevance of groupthink forthe 21st century" 73 : 327-351, 1998

    18 Tajfel, H., "The social identity theory of intergroup behavior, In Psychology of Intergroup Relations" Nelson-Hall 33-47, 1986

    19 Pirola-Merlo, A., "The relationship between individual creativity andteam creativity: Aggregating across people and time" 25 : 235-257, 2004

    20 Shalley, C.E, "The effects of personal and contextualcharacteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here" 30 : 933-958, 2004

    21 Payne,R, "The effectiveness of research teams: A review, In Innovation and creativity at work" John Wiley 101-122, 1990

    22 Caldwell, D.F, "The determinants of team-based innovationin organizations: The role of social influence" 34 (34): 497-517, 2003

    23 Amabile, T.M, "The creative environment scales: workenvironment inventory" 2 : 231-253, 1989

    24 Tierney,P, "The contribution of leadership, supportive environment, andindividual attributes to creative performance: A quantitative field study" Univ. of Cincinnati. 1992

    25 Lipnack, J, "The Teamnet Factor: Bringing the Power ofBoundary Crossing in the Hearts of Your Business" Oliver Wright 1993

    26 Byrne,D, "The Attraction Paradigm" Academic Press 1971

    27 "The American Heritage Dictionary of English Language" Houghton Mifflin 2000

    28 Jackson,S.E, "Team composition in organizations, In Group process and productivity" Sage publications 1992

    29 Sundstrom,E, "Supporting work team effectiveness" Jossey-Bass 1999

    30 South, S.J, "Social structure andintergroup interaction: Men and women of the federal bureaucracy" 47 : 587-599, 1982

    31 Bandura,A, "Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory" Prentice-Hall 1986

    32 Milliken, F.J, "Searching for common threads: Understandingthe multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups" 21 (21): 402-433, 1996

    33 Simonton,D.K, "Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: Theintegration of product, person and process perspectives" 129 (129): 475-494, 2004

    34 Dailey,R.C, "Relationship between locus of control, perceived groupcohesiveness, and satisfaction with coworkers" Psychological Reports 311-316, 1978

    35 Barrick, M.R, "Relating memberability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness" 83 : 377-391, 1998

    36 Abbey, A, "R&D work climate and innovation insemiconductors" 26 : 362-368, 1983

    37 Nunnally, J.C, "Psychometric Thoery" McGraw-Hill 1978

    38 Keller,R.T, "Predictors of the performance of project groups in R&Dorganizations" 29 : 715-726, 1986

    39 Isaksen, S.G, "Perceptions of the best andworst climates for creativity: Preliminary validation evidence for the situationaloutlook questionnaire" 13 : 171-184, 2001

    40 Clark,M.A, "Perceived relational demography: A fit conceptualisation" Arizona State University 2001

    41 Hobman, E.V, "Perceived dissimilarity and work groupinvolvement: The moderating effects of group openness to diversity" 29 : 560-587, 2004

    42 Drazin, R, "Multilevel theorizing about creativity inorganizations: A sensemaking perspective" 24 : 286-307, 1999

    43 Van de Ven, A.H, "Measuring and Assessing Organizations" Wiley 1980

    44 Souder,W.E, "Managing New Product Innovations" Lexington Press 1987

    45 Jain, R.K, "Management of R&D Organizations" John Wiley& Sons 1990

    46 Basadur,M, "Leading others to think innovatively together: Creative leadership" 15 (15): 103-121, 2004

    47 Yukl,G, "Leadership in organizations" Prentice-Hall 1989

    48 Reiter-Palmon, R, "Leadership and creativity: Understandingleadership from the creative problem-solving perspective" 15 : 55-77, 2004

    49 Justesen,S.L, "Innoversity: A study of the dynamics inherent in the relationshipbetween innovation and diversity" Working Paper 2001

    50 King, N, "Innovation in working groups, In .), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological andorganizational strategies" Wiley 81-100, 1990

    51 West, M.A, "Innovation at work, In Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies" Wiley 3-14, 1990

    52 Agrell, A, "Innovation and creativity in work groups, In Handbook of work group psychology" Wiley 317-344, 1996

    53 Festinger,L, "Informal social communication" 57 : 271-282, 1950

    54 Blau,P.M, "Inequality and heterogeneity: A Primitive theory of socialstructure" Free Press 1977

    55 Webber, S.S, "Impact of highly and less job-related diversityon work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis" 27 : 141-162, 2001

    56 Janis,I, "Groupthink" Houghton-Mifflin 1982

    57 McGrath,J.E, "Groups, interaction, and performance" Prentice-Hall 1984

    58 Goodman, P.S, "Groups and productivity:Analyzing the effectiveness of self-managing teams, In Designing Effective Work Groups" Jossey-Bass 295-327, 1988

    59 Shaw,M.E, "Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior" McGraw-Hill 1981

    60 Nijstad, B.A, "Group creativity: Common themes and futuredirections , In Group Creativity: Innovationthrough Collaboration" Oxford University Press 326-339, 2003

    61 Paulus, P.B, "Group creativity, In Social creativity in organizations" Hampton 151-176, 1999

    62 Landau, S, "From conflict to creativity - Howresolving workplace disagreements can inspire innovation and productivity" Jossey-Bass 2001

    63 Cummings, A, "Enhancing creativity: Managing work contextfor the high potential employee" 40 : 22-39, 1997

    64 Shalley, C.E, "Effects of social-psychological factors oncreative performance: The role of informational and controlling expectedevaluation and modeling experience" 84 : 1-22, 2001

    65 Schoonhoven, C.B., "Dynamic tension in innovative, hightechnology firms: Managing rapid technological change through organizationalstructure , In ManagingComplexity in High Technology Organizations" Oxford University Press 90-118, 1990

    66 Harrington,B, "Dollars and difference : Values, diversity and performance" 2008

    67 Mohrman, S.A, "Designing team-basedorganizations: New forms for knowledge work" Jossey-Bass 1995

    68 Williams, K.Y., "Demography and diversity in organizations:A review of 40 years of research, In Research in Organizational Behavior" JAI Press 77-140, 1998

    69 Lau, D.C, "Demographic diversity and faultlines: Thecompositional dynamics of organizational groups" 23 (23): 325-340, 1998

    70 Tsui, A.S, "Demographic differences in organizations: Currentresearch and future directions" Lexington 1999

    71 Cox,T, "Cultural diversity in organizations: Theory, research and practice" Berrett-Koehler Publishers 1993

    72 Mumford, M.D, "Creativity syndrome: Integration, applicationand innovation" 103 (103): 27-43, 1988

    73 Moore,R.M.III, "Creativity of small groups and of persons working alone" 140 : 142-143, 2000

    74 Levitt,T, "Creativity is not enough" (August) : 137-144, 2002

    75 Oldham, G.R, "Creativity in the organizational contents" 39 (39): 187-194, 1998

    76 Nystrom,H, "Creativity and innovation" Wiley 1979

    77 Puccio,G.J, "Creative problem solving preferences: Their identification andimplications" 8 : 171-178, 1999

    78 Eby, L, "Collectivistic orientation in teams: An individual andgroup-level analysis" 18 : 275-295, 1997

    79 Bernthal, P.R, "Cohesiveness without groupthink: The interactiveeffects of social and task cohesion" 18 : 66-87, 1993

    80 Zaccaro, S.J, "Cohesiveness and performance on an additive task:Evidence for multidimensionality" 128 : 547-558, 1988

    81 Wolff, A.C, "Beyondgenerational differences: A literature review of the impact of relational diversityon nurses' attitudes and work" 18 : 948-969, 2010

    82 Austin, J.R, "A cognitive framework for understanding demographic influencesin groups" 5 (5): 342-360, 1997

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-02-26 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Association Of Personnel Administration -> Korean Academy of Organization and Management KCI등재
    2010-02-26 학술지명변경 한글명 : 인사관리연구 -> 조직과 인사관리연구
    외국어명 : The Korean Personnel Administration Journal -> Journal of Organization and Management
    KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 2.35 2.35 2.29
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.36 2.41 4.335 0.59
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼