RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      냉전기 중국의 대북정책과 북ㆍ중 동맹관계의 동학

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82668991

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This article demonstrates what was China’s motivation for tightening up the alliance with North Korea in Cold War era. Changes in relationship with Soviet Union and U.S. forced China to tighten up the alliance with North Korea to secure North Korea’s supports in cold war diplomacy. China-North Korea alliance was not static and stable one during the cold war era. Rather, it was dynamic relationship between amity and hostility. Friendly relationship between two countries only occurred twice during the period of cold war. China needed strategic action to maintain corporative alliance with North Korea, originated from changing relationship with superpower countries, mainly U.S. and Soviet Union.
      China-North Korea relation shows same pattern during the post cold-war era. While establishing diplomatic ties with South Korea in 1992, as well as enjoying the period of affinity with U.S., China paid less attention to North Korea. Accordingly, some scholars from China and South Korea declared a switch of foreign relation between China and North Korea, from strategic alliance to normal partnership. During recent years, however, strong strategic relationship emerged again between two countries. Since the global financial crisis in 2008, growth of China’s national power based on rapid economic development has mounted political tension between China and U.S. In addition, the tragedy Cheonan ship sink by North Korean torpedo attach stiffened China-U.S. relationship, and tightened up trilateral alliance of U.S., Japan, and South Korea. As a result, Chinese foreign policy took back actions of strong strategic alliance with North Korea.
      Understanding of this dynamic relationship between China and North Korea gives an important implication to South Korea’s foreign policy toward China. When the relationships of U.S.-China and North-South Korea develop corporative ones, it is likely to bring normal partnership between China and North Korea, rather than strong strategic alliance. On the contrary, when China confronts U.S. and Korea conflicts with North Korea seriously, Chinese government will go back to seek strong supports from North Korea, resulting in polarity between South Korea-U.S. and North Korea-China alliances. Moreover, the confrontation between two alliances would become a source of insecurity in the Northeast Asia and deepen South Korea’s dependence on great powers around the region.
      Therefore, South Korea’s foreign policy should focus on preventing confrontation between China and U.S. and enhancing inter-Korean corporation to stabilize security in the Northeast Asian region. Also, South Korea should build up ability to maneuver independent foreign policy to create peaceful environment for regional security and reunification of two Koreas.
      번역하기

      This article demonstrates what was China’s motivation for tightening up the alliance with North Korea in Cold War era. Changes in relationship with Soviet Union and U.S. forced China to tighten up the alliance with North Korea to secure North Korea...

      This article demonstrates what was China’s motivation for tightening up the alliance with North Korea in Cold War era. Changes in relationship with Soviet Union and U.S. forced China to tighten up the alliance with North Korea to secure North Korea’s supports in cold war diplomacy. China-North Korea alliance was not static and stable one during the cold war era. Rather, it was dynamic relationship between amity and hostility. Friendly relationship between two countries only occurred twice during the period of cold war. China needed strategic action to maintain corporative alliance with North Korea, originated from changing relationship with superpower countries, mainly U.S. and Soviet Union.
      China-North Korea relation shows same pattern during the post cold-war era. While establishing diplomatic ties with South Korea in 1992, as well as enjoying the period of affinity with U.S., China paid less attention to North Korea. Accordingly, some scholars from China and South Korea declared a switch of foreign relation between China and North Korea, from strategic alliance to normal partnership. During recent years, however, strong strategic relationship emerged again between two countries. Since the global financial crisis in 2008, growth of China’s national power based on rapid economic development has mounted political tension between China and U.S. In addition, the tragedy Cheonan ship sink by North Korean torpedo attach stiffened China-U.S. relationship, and tightened up trilateral alliance of U.S., Japan, and South Korea. As a result, Chinese foreign policy took back actions of strong strategic alliance with North Korea.
      Understanding of this dynamic relationship between China and North Korea gives an important implication to South Korea’s foreign policy toward China. When the relationships of U.S.-China and North-South Korea develop corporative ones, it is likely to bring normal partnership between China and North Korea, rather than strong strategic alliance. On the contrary, when China confronts U.S. and Korea conflicts with North Korea seriously, Chinese government will go back to seek strong supports from North Korea, resulting in polarity between South Korea-U.S. and North Korea-China alliances. Moreover, the confrontation between two alliances would become a source of insecurity in the Northeast Asia and deepen South Korea’s dependence on great powers around the region.
      Therefore, South Korea’s foreign policy should focus on preventing confrontation between China and U.S. and enhancing inter-Korean corporation to stabilize security in the Northeast Asian region. Also, South Korea should build up ability to maneuver independent foreign policy to create peaceful environment for regional security and reunification of two Koreas.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 서진영, "현대중국정치론" 나남 1997

      2 송영주, "한중관계론" 지영사 1993

      3 박창희, "지정학적 이익 변화와 북중동맹관계기원, 발전, 그리고 전망" 아태지역연구센터 31 (31): 27-55, 2007

      4 이춘호, "중조관계의 변화와 그 전망" 아태지역연구센터 31 (31): 13-26, 2007

      5 이정남, "중국의 전략적 동반자외교에 대한 이해와 한중관계" 평화와 민주주의연구소 17 (17): 100-121, 2009

      6 박규태, "중국의 대북관계: ‘전통적 우호관계’의 특성" 22 : 2003

      7 "조선중앙년감" 조선중앙통신사 1973

      8 최명해, "조선민주주의 인민공화국과 중화인민공화국 간의 우호, 협조, 및 호상 원조에 관한 조약 in: 중국・북한 동맹관계" 2009

      9 Choudhury, G.W, "약소국 생존론" 대왕사 1995

      10 박홍서, "북핵위기시 중국의 대북 동맹안보딜레마 관리 연구: -대미관계의 변화를 주요 동인으로" 한국국제정치학회 46 (46): 103-122, 2006

      1 서진영, "현대중국정치론" 나남 1997

      2 송영주, "한중관계론" 지영사 1993

      3 박창희, "지정학적 이익 변화와 북중동맹관계기원, 발전, 그리고 전망" 아태지역연구센터 31 (31): 27-55, 2007

      4 이춘호, "중조관계의 변화와 그 전망" 아태지역연구센터 31 (31): 13-26, 2007

      5 이정남, "중국의 전략적 동반자외교에 대한 이해와 한중관계" 평화와 민주주의연구소 17 (17): 100-121, 2009

      6 박규태, "중국의 대북관계: ‘전통적 우호관계’의 특성" 22 : 2003

      7 "조선중앙년감" 조선중앙통신사 1973

      8 최명해, "조선민주주의 인민공화국과 중화인민공화국 간의 우호, 협조, 및 호상 원조에 관한 조약 in: 중국・북한 동맹관계" 2009

      9 Choudhury, G.W, "약소국 생존론" 대왕사 1995

      10 박홍서, "북핵위기시 중국의 대북 동맹안보딜레마 관리 연구: -대미관계의 변화를 주요 동인으로" 한국국제정치학회 46 (46): 103-122, 2006

      11 최명해, "북한・중국 동맹관계" 오름 2009

      12 이종석, "북한-중국관계: 1945-2000" 중심 2000

      13 시모노토마이 노부오, "북한 정권탄생의 진실" 기파랑 2006

      14 이상우, "북한 40년" 을유문화사 1990

      15 정진위, "북방 3각 관계: 북한의 대중・소 관계를 중심으로" 법문사 1987

      16 최명해, "북∙중 동맹조약 체결에 관한 소고" 한국정치학회 42 (42): 317-340, 2008

      17 조영남, "동아시아와 중국의 동맹정책 in: 미래지향적 한・중관계" 폴리테이아 2009

      18 이상숙, "데탕트 시기 북중관계의 비대칭갈등과 그 영향" 한국정치학회 42 (42): 439-456, 2008

      19 陶常梅, "独立自主外交政策下的中朝关系" 23 (23): 2008

      20 中华人民共和国外交部, "毛泽东外交文选" 中央文献出版社 1994

      21 中华人民共和国外交部, "毛泽东外交文选" 中央文献出版社 1994

      22 李南周, "朝鲜的变化与中朝关系-从“传统友好合作关系”到“实利关系" (9) : 2005

      23 李天英, "朝鲜半岛的地缘政治与中国安全" (2) : 2004

      24 叶自成, "新中国外交思想:从毛泽东到邓小平" 北京大学出版社 2001

      25 刘卫, "抗美援朝与援越抗美-论中国在两次战争中不同外交战略选择" 2006

      26 周恩来, "周恩来年谱(中)" 中央文献出版社 1997

      27 中共中央文献研究室, "周恩来军事文集, in 第4卷" 人民出版社 1999

      28 金正昆, "伙伴战略:中国外交的理性抉择" 7 : 2000

      29 陆俊元, "从地缘战略看朝鲜半岛的安全价值" 4 : 1996

      30 庞朕, "从同盟到伙伴:中朝关系的历史演变" (3) : 2008

      31 "人民日報(해외판)" 1992

      32 钱其琛, "中韩建交,金日成冷对中国客人" (6) : 2010

      33 张英, "中朝关系与朝鲜半岛和平统一" 2003

      34 李敦球, "中朝:从友好邻邦到友好合作伙伴" (22) : 2005

      35 徐用, "东北地缘战略因素与抗美援朝战争关系再探讨" (6) : 2007

      36 Hart, Tom, "The PRC-DPRK Rapprochement and China’s Dilemma in Korea" 25 (25): 2001

      37 Chambers, Michael R, "Dealing with a Truculent Ally: A Comparative Perspective on China’s Handing of North Korea" (5) : 2005

      38 Scobell, Andrew, "China and North Korea; The Limits of Influence" 102 (102): 2003

      39 Ji, You, "China and North Korea; A Fragile Relationship of Strategic Convenience" 10 (10): 2001

      40 Lee, Jae-Jin, "China and Korea: Dynamic Relations" Hoover Institution 1996

      41 Zhai, Qiang, "Beijing and the Vietnam Conglict, 1964-1965: New Chinese Evidence" CWIHP Bulletin (6) : 1996

      42 서진영, "21세기 중국의 외교정책" 폴리테이아 2006

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-01-14 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Peace Studies KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-05-28 학회명변경 한글명 : 평화연구소 -> 평화와 민주주의연구소
      영문명 : Institute for Peace Studies, Korea University -> Peace & Democracy Institute
      KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.82 0.82 0.72
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.69 0.74 1.224 0.27
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼