RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    구어 오류 처치에 대한 한국어교사와 학습자의 인식 조사 = Investigating the perception of Korean language teachers and Chinese speaking students to spoken errors treatment in second language classroom

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82640105

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to investigate Korean language teachers’ and Chinese speaking students’ perception about the necessity, frequency, timing, type, delivering agent, and method of error treatment through questionnaires, and based on the findings, to suggest some potential suggestions to treat spoken errors in Korean language oral communication classes. A total of 151 students from two universities in Busan and 67 teachers from 7 universities in Busan and Seoul completed 24-item survey. The results revealed that there is the mismatch between teachers and students perception about the effectiveness of error spoken error treatment in Korean language classroom; (1) students preferred their spoken errors to be treated strongly, (2) preferred to receive error treatment more frequently than their teachers expected, and (3) the best time to treat spoken errors is after they speaks. In addition, (4) students expected to be treated their all kinds of errors, especially frequent errors. But (5) in terms of the delivering agent of error treatment, teachers and students both regarded teachers as the appropriate people to treat errors. And finally (6) students expected to treat their errors via explicit feedback and recast, but teachers expected to treat students’ errors via implicit feedback, elicitation and repetition. The overall findings indicate that Chinese speaking students have more positive and strong perception to error treatment than their teachers’.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to investigate Korean language teachers’ and Chinese speaking students’ perception about the necessity, frequency, timing, type, delivering agent, and method of error treatment through questionnaires, and based on the...

    The purpose of this study was to investigate Korean language teachers’ and Chinese speaking students’ perception about the necessity, frequency, timing, type, delivering agent, and method of error treatment through questionnaires, and based on the findings, to suggest some potential suggestions to treat spoken errors in Korean language oral communication classes. A total of 151 students from two universities in Busan and 67 teachers from 7 universities in Busan and Seoul completed 24-item survey. The results revealed that there is the mismatch between teachers and students perception about the effectiveness of error spoken error treatment in Korean language classroom; (1) students preferred their spoken errors to be treated strongly, (2) preferred to receive error treatment more frequently than their teachers expected, and (3) the best time to treat spoken errors is after they speaks. In addition, (4) students expected to be treated their all kinds of errors, especially frequent errors. But (5) in terms of the delivering agent of error treatment, teachers and students both regarded teachers as the appropriate people to treat errors. And finally (6) students expected to treat their errors via explicit feedback and recast, but teachers expected to treat students’ errors via implicit feedback, elicitation and repetition. The overall findings indicate that Chinese speaking students have more positive and strong perception to error treatment than their teachers’.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 들어가기
    • 2. 연구 대상 및 연구 절차
    • 3. 결과 및 논의
    • 4. 요약 및 나가기
    • 참고문헌
    • 1. 들어가기
    • 2. 연구 대상 및 연구 절차
    • 3. 결과 및 논의
    • 4. 요약 및 나가기
    • 참고문헌
    • [부록] 구어 오류 처치에 관한 한국어교사와 학습자의 인식 조사(교사용)
    • 【논문초록】
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 진제희, "한국어 수업에 나타난 교사의 수정적 피드백과 학습자 반응 연구" 이중언어학회 (28) : 371-390, 2005

    2 한상미, "한국어 교실에서 나타난 교사의 피드백 유형 연구" 연세대학교 언어연구교육원 한국어학당 2526 : 453-505, 2001

    3 김창구, "학습자의 입장에서 본 훌륭한 한국어교사의 자질 부산 지역 3개 대학 중국인 한국어 학습자를 대상으로" 한국어문화교육학회 2 : 1-20, 2008

    4 김영주, "중국인 한국어 학습자들의 구어오류수정에 대한 인식조사-학문목적 학습자를 중심으로-" 이중언어학회 (37) : 25-60, 2008

    5 송해성, "외국어 어떻게 배우고 가르치는가" 범문사 2005

    6 임수진, "오류 고쳐 되말하기가 한국어 학습자의 형태 학습에 미치는 영향" 이화여자대학교 2008

    7 Truscott,J, "What's wrong with oral grammar correction" 55 (55): 437-456, 1999

    8 Krashen,S.D, "The natural approach:Language acquisition in the classroom" Pergamon Press 1983

    9 Chaudron,C, "Second language classrooms:Research on teaching and learning" Cambridge University Press 1988

    10 Ellis,R, "Second language acquisition" oxford University Press 1997

    1 진제희, "한국어 수업에 나타난 교사의 수정적 피드백과 학습자 반응 연구" 이중언어학회 (28) : 371-390, 2005

    2 한상미, "한국어 교실에서 나타난 교사의 피드백 유형 연구" 연세대학교 언어연구교육원 한국어학당 2526 : 453-505, 2001

    3 김창구, "학습자의 입장에서 본 훌륭한 한국어교사의 자질 부산 지역 3개 대학 중국인 한국어 학습자를 대상으로" 한국어문화교육학회 2 : 1-20, 2008

    4 김영주, "중국인 한국어 학습자들의 구어오류수정에 대한 인식조사-학문목적 학습자를 중심으로-" 이중언어학회 (37) : 25-60, 2008

    5 송해성, "외국어 어떻게 배우고 가르치는가" 범문사 2005

    6 임수진, "오류 고쳐 되말하기가 한국어 학습자의 형태 학습에 미치는 영향" 이화여자대학교 2008

    7 Truscott,J, "What's wrong with oral grammar correction" 55 (55): 437-456, 1999

    8 Krashen,S.D, "The natural approach:Language acquisition in the classroom" Pergamon Press 1983

    9 Chaudron,C, "Second language classrooms:Research on teaching and learning" Cambridge University Press 1988

    10 Ellis,R, "Second language acquisition" oxford University Press 1997

    11 LeCompte,M, "Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research" 52 (52): 31-60, 1982

    12 Katayama,A, "Perceptions of JFL students toward correction of oral errors" JALT 1248-1264, 2006

    13 Panova,I, "Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in and adult ESL classroom" 36 (36): 573-595, 2002

    14 Pavesi,M, "Markedness,discoursal models,and relative clause formation in a formal and informal context" 8 : 38-55, 1986

    15 Rubin,J, "How to be a more successful language learner" Heinle & Heinle Publishers, Inc. 1982

    16 Allwright,R.L, "Focus on the language classroom:An introduction to classroom research for language teachers" Cambridge University Press 1991

    17 Schulz,R.A, "Focus on form in the foreign language classroom:Students’ and teachers’ views on error correction and the role of grammar" 29 (29): 343-364, 1996

    18 Ancker,W, "Errors and corrective feedback:Updated theory and classroom practice" 38 : 20-24, 2000

    19 Fukuda,Y, "Error treatment research in oral communication classes in Japanese high school" San Francisco state University 2003

    20 Lee,J, "Error analysis and corrective measures for intermediate Korean language in America" 4 : 163-179, 1999

    21 Schulz,R.A, "Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback" 85 (85): 244-258, 2001

    22 Lyster,R, "Corrective feedback and learner uptake:Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms" 19 : 37-66, 1997

    23 Nunan,D, "Communicative language teaching:The learner’s view.In Communication and learning in the classroom community" SEAMEO Regional Language Centre 176-190, 1987

    24 Chenoweth,N.A, "Attitudes and preferences of ESL students to error correction" 6 (6): 79-87, 1983

    25 Lee,S-I, "An analysis of errors in speaking practice" 6 : 225-248, 2001

    26 Lee,S-I, "An analysis of a speaking practice in Korean" 5 : 257-271, 2000

    27 Julie Damron, "A Study on the Students' Error Feedback Preferences According to roficiency Level" 국제한국어교육학회 20 (20): 337-358, 2009

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-03-17 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Association of North-East Asian Cultures KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2004-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.46 0.46 0.43
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.41 0.37 0.629 0.09
    더보기
    해외이동버튼