다문화가족의 혼인에 관한 헌법적 보호 = The Constitutional Protection of the Marriage of Multicultural Family

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

As international marriage has increased rapidly in Korea, multicultural family also has increased radically. Therefore, it is necessary to settle down the suffering of multicultural family and improve its quality of life. It seems to be meaningful to protect multicultural family and maintain its equal family life from the aspect of laying the foundation of realizing a cultural state. In addition, the constitutional right of marriage and family life is a principle norm which must be equally realized in multicultural family.
The current nature of multicultural family reflects domestic gender relations. The conventional patriarchal system is enforced on domestic multicultural family as well and it makes the equality of marriage and family life difficult to be realized. And due to the inequality in the relationship of marriage formation, the problem of female marriage immigrants’ human right is severe for the present. Therefore, it is necessary to overcome the patriarchal multiculturalism which is currently come to the fore as a new problem of multicultural family, and form a gender equality-oriented multicultural family from gender perspectives. In particular, it is urgent to provide legal values to multicultural family in order to realize the protection of the marriage of multicultural family.
Recently, the law that is related to the management of matchmaking business has been revised partly, but the provision of punishment that is related to providing personal information is still insufficient and therefore the effective enforcement of law is not realized so far. So, the problem of matchmaking business entities has occurred endlessly and become a sample of human right violation. Therefore, it is necessary to reconsider the problem of matchmaking business from gender perspectives and guarantee female immigrants’ right to live and right of gender self-determination. Regarding the multicultural family support law, its scope of beneficiaries is very narrow and its provision is excessively arbitrary, thus guaranteeing no practical legal effectiveness. On account of this, female marriage immigrants cannot have the right to request the practical support and protection of such universal right as the right of health and reproduction. Domestic Constitutional Court has clarified the fact that foreigners must be the subject of pursuing the dignity, value and happiness of human beings. In this regard, the well-being of all the people who live in Korea must be guaranteed. If so, the settlement of problem of human right infringement of female marriage immigrants who come to Korea to marry cannot be neglected, in particular. Regarding the issue whether female marriage immigrants are family members or not before they acquired nationality, they must be provided with appropriate status in order for their human right to be protected. The discrimination by the difference of race, religion and nation must not be allowed any more. It is also necessary to realize multiculturalism in domestic society as a principle of harmony and coexistence.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 들어가며
• Ⅱ. 다문화사회의 의미와 다문화주의
• Ⅲ. 다문화 가족의 혼인보호에 대한 헌법논의
• Ⅳ. 다문화가족의 혼인보호를 위한 법률 개선방향
• Ⅴ. 맺음말
• 참고문헌
• [Abstract]

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 성낙인, "헌법학 제11판(개정판)" 법문사 2011

2 "조선일보 2010년 7월 16일"

3 김승권, "전국다문화가족 실태조사 연구" 보건복지가족부･법무부･여성부･한국보건사회연구원

4 "시사IN 2010년 8월 4일"

5 미셸린 이샤이, "세계인권사상사" 길 2005

6 권영호, "사회통합을 위한 다문화가정 관련법에 대한 입법평가 - 다문화가족지원법에 대한입법평가를 중심으로"

7 김정선, "문제는 다시 국제결혼 중개업이다! 인권의 관점에서 본 <결혼중개업의 관리에 관한법률>토론회"

8 국가인권위원회, "문제는 다시 국제결혼 중개업이다! 인권의 관점에서 본 <결혼중개업의 관리에 관한 법률>토론회"

9 "동아일보 2009년 11월 9일"

10 김선택, "다문화현상과 헌법적 대응" 국가인권위원회 2010

11 조성남, "다문화사회의 새로운 이해" 도서출판 그린 2009

12 문영석, "다문화사회에서의 종교 - 캐나다 사례를 중심으로" 2010

13 김백영, "다문화사회 일본과 정체성 정치" 서울대학교출판문화원 2010

14 박종보, "다문화가족지원법 마련을 위한 연구" 2006

15 소라미, "다문화가족이 법률관계" 한국젠더법학회 2009

16 정상우, "다문화가족 지원에 관한 법체계 개선 방안 연구" 법학연구소 26 (26): 483-510, 2009

17 김주환, "기본권의 주체" 헌법재판소 2009

18 김재련, "국제결혼 여성에 대한 체류자격 보장과 관련한 논의" 2009

19 "국무총리실 보도자료"

20 "국가인권위원회 결정례집 제3집 (2007-2008)"

21 소 라 미, "指定討論 要旨" 한국법학원 (96) : 43-53, 2007

22 "http://www.wmigrant.org/xe2/article/27460"

23 "http://www.unhchr.ch/huricane/huricane.nsf/view01/B77E3956B335DD33C1257333004FA7CA?opendocument"

24 "http://www.humanrights.go.kr/04_sub/body02.jsp?NT_ID=24&flag=VIEW&SEQ_ID=598946&page=1"