RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      인지적 구성주의와 사회적 구성주의에 대한 간략한 고찰 = A Brief Reflection on Cognitive and Social Constructivism

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101959942

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      A criterion to differentiate objectivism from constructivism IS epistemological positions of each camp, i. e. , how to define the nature of knowledge and the process of know ledge acquisition. On one hand, according to objectivist epistemology, know ledge is an identifiable fixed entity, and the ultimate goal of objectivists is to discover truth which has universal and ahistorical features. On the other hand, constructivist. epistemology IS an antithesis of the objectivist epistemology : Knowledge is not discovered, nor found, but rather constructed, and created, particularly based upon social and cultural situations of individual experiences. Constructivism, then, is classified into two categories, as cognitive and social (or socio- cultural) constructivism, which place their theoretical basises in Piagetian and Vygotskian psychology, respectively : It is cognitive constructivism, when individual psychological aspect is emphasized over social aspects, while it is social constructivism, when social interaction is foregrounded over individual psychological aspects, in the process of knowledge construction; and it is cognitive constructivism when individual cognition and social interaction are regarded as independent factors, while it is social constructivism, when mutual interplay between these two factors is emphasized. Examining how Collins`` cognitive apprenticeship is different from Lave and Rogoff’s, this research tries to distinguish perspective differences between these two camps, which is followed by a brief introduction of several social constructivists focusing on their uniquenesses and differences in terms of theoretical view s and use of terminology. After all, this research intends not to highlight differences between cognitive and social constructivism, but rather to build more comprehensive understanding of constructivism, and develop diverse constructivist principles and strategies which can be widely applied for real situation s of learning and teaching.
      번역하기

      A criterion to differentiate objectivism from constructivism IS epistemological positions of each camp, i. e. , how to define the nature of knowledge and the process of know ledge acquisition. On one hand, according to objectivist epistemology, know l...

      A criterion to differentiate objectivism from constructivism IS epistemological positions of each camp, i. e. , how to define the nature of knowledge and the process of know ledge acquisition. On one hand, according to objectivist epistemology, know ledge is an identifiable fixed entity, and the ultimate goal of objectivists is to discover truth which has universal and ahistorical features. On the other hand, constructivist. epistemology IS an antithesis of the objectivist epistemology : Knowledge is not discovered, nor found, but rather constructed, and created, particularly based upon social and cultural situations of individual experiences. Constructivism, then, is classified into two categories, as cognitive and social (or socio- cultural) constructivism, which place their theoretical basises in Piagetian and Vygotskian psychology, respectively : It is cognitive constructivism, when individual psychological aspect is emphasized over social aspects, while it is social constructivism, when social interaction is foregrounded over individual psychological aspects, in the process of knowledge construction; and it is cognitive constructivism when individual cognition and social interaction are regarded as independent factors, while it is social constructivism, when mutual interplay between these two factors is emphasized. Examining how Collins`` cognitive apprenticeship is different from Lave and Rogoff’s, this research tries to distinguish perspective differences between these two camps, which is followed by a brief introduction of several social constructivists focusing on their uniquenesses and differences in terms of theoretical view s and use of terminology. After all, this research intends not to highlight differences between cognitive and social constructivism, but rather to build more comprehensive understanding of constructivism, and develop diverse constructivist principles and strategies which can be widely applied for real situation s of learning and teaching.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼