RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Csikszentmihalyi의 몰입 요소에 근거한 학습 몰입 척도 개발 및 타당화 연구 = Development and Validation of the Learning Flow Scale

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101959662

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to develop and validate the Learning Flow Scale that can measure flow level in real learning situation. This study was administered to 792 6th grade elementary school students (339 in pilot test and 453 in main test). As statistical methods, item analysis and Exploratory Factor Analysis(EFA) were conducted to test the reliability of items and the factor structure. And Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA) was conducted to test the validity and fitness of the Learning Flow Scale. First, based on the results of literature review, we identified 9 components of Csikszentmihalyi`s flow construct and developed the 200 pilot items. Analyzing the pilot test data, the result obtained 51 items, 8 factors except ``Transformation of Time`` of Csikszentmihalyi`s 9 flow factors. Based on theory, we added 19 items and conducted 70 items in main test. Analyzing the main test data, the result obtained 49 items, 9 factors. Conducting Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA), improving goodness of fit of the model, and modifying the model, the result obtained 35 items, 9 factors as the final learning flow scale. As a result of Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA), the goodness of fit indices(GFI, AGFI, CFI, RMSEA) demonstrated statistically significance and fitness of the model. The final Learning Flow Scale supported Csikszentmihalyi`s 9 flow factors. The Learning Flow Scale can be used as a valid instrument to measure flow level in the learning situation. Suggestions for use of the scale and for further research are discussed.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to develop and validate the Learning Flow Scale that can measure flow level in real learning situation. This study was administered to 792 6th grade elementary school students (339 in pilot test and 453 in main test). As ...

    The purpose of this study was to develop and validate the Learning Flow Scale that can measure flow level in real learning situation. This study was administered to 792 6th grade elementary school students (339 in pilot test and 453 in main test). As statistical methods, item analysis and Exploratory Factor Analysis(EFA) were conducted to test the reliability of items and the factor structure. And Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA) was conducted to test the validity and fitness of the Learning Flow Scale. First, based on the results of literature review, we identified 9 components of Csikszentmihalyi`s flow construct and developed the 200 pilot items. Analyzing the pilot test data, the result obtained 51 items, 8 factors except ``Transformation of Time`` of Csikszentmihalyi`s 9 flow factors. Based on theory, we added 19 items and conducted 70 items in main test. Analyzing the main test data, the result obtained 49 items, 9 factors. Conducting Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA), improving goodness of fit of the model, and modifying the model, the result obtained 35 items, 9 factors as the final learning flow scale. As a result of Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA), the goodness of fit indices(GFI, AGFI, CFI, RMSEA) demonstrated statistically significance and fitness of the model. The final Learning Flow Scale supported Csikszentmihalyi`s 9 flow factors. The Learning Flow Scale can be used as a valid instrument to measure flow level in the learning situation. Suggestions for use of the scale and for further research are discussed.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "학습몰입검사의 제작 및 타당화 연구" 2005

    2 "정상학습프로그램이 몰입수준 향상에 미치는 효과" 2001

    3 "몰입에 대한 학습동기와 인지전략과의 관계" 15 (15): 199-219, 2001

    4 "몰입수준의 변화가 수학학업성취도 및 수학적 태도에 미치는 효과" 2003

    5 "교수몰입 척도의 개발 및 타당화" 2006

    6 "the psychology of commitment" Academic Press and tur (and tur): 1982

    7 "e-Learning 환경에서의 몰입 경험을 위한 교수학습전략 연구" 2005

    8 "and psychological well-being in a sample of young adults Journal of Community and Applied Psychology" 147-160, 1992

    9 "a comparative analysis of positive human experiences Journal of Personality and Social Psychology" 1361-1368, 1983

    10 "Use of Structural Education Modeling in Counseling Psychology Research Journal of Couseling Psychology" 425-36, 1987

    1 "학습몰입검사의 제작 및 타당화 연구" 2005

    2 "정상학습프로그램이 몰입수준 향상에 미치는 효과" 2001

    3 "몰입에 대한 학습동기와 인지전략과의 관계" 15 (15): 199-219, 2001

    4 "몰입수준의 변화가 수학학업성취도 및 수학적 태도에 미치는 효과" 2003

    5 "교수몰입 척도의 개발 및 타당화" 2006

    6 "the psychology of commitment" Academic Press and tur (and tur): 1982

    7 "e-Learning 환경에서의 몰입 경험을 위한 교수학습전략 연구" 2005

    8 "and psychological well-being in a sample of young adults Journal of Community and Applied Psychology" 147-160, 1992

    9 "a comparative analysis of positive human experiences Journal of Personality and Social Psychology" 1361-1368, 1983

    10 "Use of Structural Education Modeling in Counseling Psychology Research Journal of Couseling Psychology" 425-36, 1987

    11 "Towards a psychology of optimal experience Review of Personality and Social Psychology" 13-36, 1982

    12 "Toward a conceptural understanding of the flow experience in elite athletes" 67 : 76-90, 1996

    13 "The roots of success and failure" Cambridge University Press 1993

    14 "The dynamics of intrinsic motivation Handbook of motivation theory and research" 45-71, 1989

    15 "The Systematic assessment of flow in daily experience Optimal Experience; Psychological studies of flow in consciousness" Cambridge university press 266-287, 1988

    16 "The Psychology of Optimal Experience" 1990

    17 "The Measurement of Flow in Everyday Life Toward a Theory of Emergent Motivation Developmental Perspectives on Motivation" 57-97, 1993

    18 "Psychological of flow in consciousness" Cambridge University Press 1988

    19 "Optimal experience in work and leisure Journal of Personality and Social Psychology" 815-822, 1989

    20 "Motivational determinants of flow: contributions from self- determination theory" 139 (139): 355-368, 1999

    21 "Measuring the flow experience Among web users" Vandervilt University 1997

    22 "Measuring the flow construct in online environment: a structural modeling approach" 1998

    23 "Measuring intrinsic motivation in everyday life" 1555-168, 1983

    24 "LISREL 구조방정식모델" 청람 2006

    25 "LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language" Scientific Software International, IL: Chicago -8, 1997

    26 "Flow in adolescence and its relation to the school experience University of Chicago" Unpublished doctoral dissertation 1978

    27 "Flow experience in sport: construct validation of multidimensional, hierarchical state and trait responses" 6 (6): 343-371, 1999

    28 "Flow and achievement in Mathematics" 1996

    29 "Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The flow state scale" 18 : 17-35, 1996

    30 "Designing for flow in a complex activity" New Zealand. 2004

    31 "Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention" New York: Harper Collins 1996

    32 "Creativity is forever" Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company 1999

    33 "Correspondence of personal descriptions and theoretical constructs Journal of Social Behavior and Personality" 169-188, 1991

    34 "Athletes in flow a qualitative investigation of flow states in elite figure skaters Journal of applied sport psychology" 161-180, 1992

    35 "Architects of innovation Journal of Creative Behavior" 75-88, 1988

    36 "Achieving flow in an online learning environment" 2004

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 3.7 3.7 3.26
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.89 2.68 3.751 0.75
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼