웹기반 팀 학습환경에서 성격유형에 의한 팀 구성방식이 팀 과제수행력, 팀워크, 상호작용에 미치는 영향 = The Effects of Introverted, Extroverted, and Mixed Team Formation on Team Performance, Teamwork, and Interaction in Web-based Team Learning Environment

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of the study was to examined the effects of team formation by the learners` personality types as indicated by introversion, extroversion, and mixed introverted and extroverted classification. 48 learners were classified as their personality types and divided into 12 teams composed of 4 learners. The results of the study showed that the extroverted teams outperformed introverted and mixed teams. However, there were no significant differences among the teams in terms of teamwork. In addition, no significant results were not found in team interaction in terms of the number of messages, the frequency of interaction, duration differences among message postings, the difference of words, the difference of mean of words.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 노태희, "학생의 내 외향성에 따른 협동학습의 효과" 20 (20): 43-51, 2000

2 양명희, "자기조절학습과 특질과의 관련성 검토:MBTI 성격차원과 학습유형을 중심으로" 19 (19): 1043-1064, 2005

3 류수영, "웹기반 온라인 토론에서 집단구성방식이 토론에 미치는 영향" 4 (4): 31-40, 2001

4 김신자, "웹 기반 토론에서 성격유형에 따른 집단구성방식이 상호작용에 미치는 영향" 34 (34): 23-39, 2003

5 정희태, "비실시간 온라인토론에서 성격유형에 따른 토론 메시지 내용 분석" 11 (11): 125-146, 2005

6 박인우, "대학교육에서 인터넷 가상토론의 비동시성과 토론자의 내향성/외향성간의 상호작용효과 연구" 14 (14): 25-49, 1998

7 John, "fact or taxonomy Dimension personality in the natural language and in questionnaires Handbook of personality theory and research" Guilford Press 66-100, 1990

8 Rentsch, J. R., "Why doGreatMindsThinkAlike?: Antecedents of Team Member Schema Agreement." 22 : 107-120, 2001March

9 Godar, S. H., "Virtual and collaborative teams: process, technologies and practice." Idea Group Publishing 2004

10 Potter, R., "Understanding composition and conflict in virtual teams" Idea Group Publishing 35-47, 2004

11 Fletcher, T. D.,, "The effects of communication modality on performance and self-ratings of teamwork components." 11 (11): 2006

12 Strijbos J. W.,, "The effect of functional roles on group efficiency." 35 : 195-229, 2004

13 Caropreso, E., "The Impact of Personality on Collaborative Online Learning" AACE. 2371-2375, 2003

14 Knight, A. B, "Team-based learning: a strategy for transforming the quality of teaching and learning." Stylus. 195-208, 2004

15 Michaelsen, L. K, "Team-based learning in large classes" Stylus. 153-168, 2004

16 Cragin, J, "Team-based learning in international situations." Stylus. 173-182, 2004

17 Freeman, M, "Team-based learning in a course combining in-class and online interaction." Stylus. 183-194, 2004

18 Ferris, "Teaching and Learning with Virtual Teams" The Idea Group. 2006

19 Mohammed, S. & Angell, L. C, "Surface- and deep-level diversity in workgroups: examining the moderating effects of team orientation and team process on relationship conflict." 25 (25): 1015-1039, 2004

20 Hashimoto, K.,, "Students international collaboration project (SICP) a cross-cultural project using virtual teams to learn communication styles." The Idea Group. 221-244, 2005

21 Jeong,A, "Sequential analysis of group interaction and critical thinking in online threaded discussions" 17 (17): 25-43, 2003

22 Cannon-Bowers, J. A.,, "Reflections on shared cognition" 22 : 195-202, 2001

23 Chambers, S.,, "Predictive Relationships Among Certain Personality Factors and Novice Teachers' Use of the Newer Technologies." AACE. 2282-2287, 2001

24 Ahn, J, "Personality of Learners and Group Collaboration Developments in E-Learning" AACE. 1455-1458, 2003

25 Fayard, A, "One School/two Campuses: a socio-technical Approach for Building The distributed Classroom." The Idea Group. 194-220, 2006

26 Nussbaum,M.E, "How introverted learners versus extroverted learners approach small-group argumentative discussions" 102 (102): 183-197, 2002

27 Chen, S., "How Does Personality Influence Collaborative Online Discussion?" AACE. 2844-2851, 2004

28 Jonassen, "Handbook of Individual Differences" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1993

29 Birmingham, C., "Group process research: Implications for using learning groups." Praeger. 77-97, 2004

30 Anderson, B., "Group and Class Contexts for Learning and Support Online: Learning and Affective Support Online in Small Group and Class Contexts." 2004.5

31 Busch, T, "Gender, Group Composition, Cooperation, and Self-Efficacy in Computer Studies." 15 (15): 125-135, 1996

32 Espinosa, J. A.,, "Explicit versus implicit coordination mechanisms and task dependencies." APA. 107-129, 2004

33 Springer, L.,, "Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis" 69 (69): 21-51, 1999

34 Downs, E.,, "Differential Characteristics of Learners in On-Line vs. Traditional Courses." (1) : 194-196, 2002

35 Poole, M. S.,, "Decision development in computer- assisted group decision making." 22 (22): 90-127, 1995

36 Staples, D. S., "Creating positive attitudes in virtual team members." Idea Group Publishing 76-94, 2004

37 Kraiger, K.,, "Conceptual development and empirical evaluation of measures of shared mental models as indicators of team effectiveness." LEA. 63-84, 1997

38 Stout, K. R, "Computer mediated technology as tools for social interaction adn educational processes" The Idea Group. 246-267, 2006

39 Henri, "Collaborative learning through computer conferencing" Springer-Verlag 117-135, 1992

40 Brannick, M. T., "An overview of team performance measurement" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 3-16, 1997

41 Entin, E. E.,, "Adaptive team coordination" 41 : 312-325, 1999

42 Shen, E.,, "A Comparative Study of a Project-Based Course: Face to Face and Online. Technical report." Florida State University Learning Systems Institute 2004