RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      e-Learning 환경에서의 자기조절학습전략, 자기효능감과 e-Learning학습전략 수준 및 학업성취도 관련성 규명 = Self-Regulation, Self-Efficacy and e-Learning Strategies during e-Learning and Academic Achievement

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101959886

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The recent literature has not paid sufficient attention to self-regulated learning which are critical for success in e-Learning environment. Instead, it tends to presuppose the same self-regulated learning strategies identified and discussed in the traditional face-to-face environment. The purposes of the present study were as follows: 1. How are the self-regulated learning strategies, self-efficacy, and e-Learning strategies related to student academic achievement within the e-Learning environment? 2. What are the co-relations among self-regulated learning strategies, self-efficacy, and e-Learning strategies? The participants were randomly selected 77 adult learners who were enrolled in one of the Korea`s digital distance universities. Three kinds of questionnaires were employed and each item was designed with 5-point Likert scales, which include self-regulated learning strategies by Zimmerman and Martinez-Pons, self-efficacy by Pintrich and De Groot, and e-Learning strategies by Lee. Mean, Pearso`s Correlation, and Multi-regression were computed for the questionnaires. The result showed that ``time management`` was the most significant predictor on academic achievement. For adult learners within the e-Learning environment, the higher time management skill the better the academic achievement. There are positive and moderately high relations among self-regulated learning strategies, self-efficacy, and e-Learning strategies. As a result, the current research confirmed in the e-Learning environment the close correlation between self-regulated learning strategies and self-efficacy well identified in the traditional learning environment. Moreover, it identified the close correlation among e-Learning strategies, self-regulated learning strategies and self-efficacy. However, strategies in group discussion, information processing, and time management of e-Learning strategies were not or slightly associated with self-regulation and self-efficacy. This result indicated that e-Learning strategies are not able to comprehensively be dealt with by the traditional framework of self-regulation and self-efficacy. The results indicated that higher time management competency facilitated better learning achievement. Although correlation data cannot address causality, it appears that the learners who are better in self-regulated learning strategy are those who are better in e-Learning strategy in general; those who are better in self-efficacy are better in e-Learning strategy.
      번역하기

      The recent literature has not paid sufficient attention to self-regulated learning which are critical for success in e-Learning environment. Instead, it tends to presuppose the same self-regulated learning strategies identified and discussed in the tr...

      The recent literature has not paid sufficient attention to self-regulated learning which are critical for success in e-Learning environment. Instead, it tends to presuppose the same self-regulated learning strategies identified and discussed in the traditional face-to-face environment. The purposes of the present study were as follows: 1. How are the self-regulated learning strategies, self-efficacy, and e-Learning strategies related to student academic achievement within the e-Learning environment? 2. What are the co-relations among self-regulated learning strategies, self-efficacy, and e-Learning strategies? The participants were randomly selected 77 adult learners who were enrolled in one of the Korea`s digital distance universities. Three kinds of questionnaires were employed and each item was designed with 5-point Likert scales, which include self-regulated learning strategies by Zimmerman and Martinez-Pons, self-efficacy by Pintrich and De Groot, and e-Learning strategies by Lee. Mean, Pearso`s Correlation, and Multi-regression were computed for the questionnaires. The result showed that ``time management`` was the most significant predictor on academic achievement. For adult learners within the e-Learning environment, the higher time management skill the better the academic achievement. There are positive and moderately high relations among self-regulated learning strategies, self-efficacy, and e-Learning strategies. As a result, the current research confirmed in the e-Learning environment the close correlation between self-regulated learning strategies and self-efficacy well identified in the traditional learning environment. Moreover, it identified the close correlation among e-Learning strategies, self-regulated learning strategies and self-efficacy. However, strategies in group discussion, information processing, and time management of e-Learning strategies were not or slightly associated with self-regulation and self-efficacy. This result indicated that e-Learning strategies are not able to comprehensively be dealt with by the traditional framework of self-regulation and self-efficacy. The results indicated that higher time management competency facilitated better learning achievement. Although correlation data cannot address causality, it appears that the learners who are better in self-regulated learning strategy are those who are better in e-Learning strategy in general; those who are better in self-efficacy are better in e-Learning strategy.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 3.7 3.7 3.26
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.89 2.68 3.751 0.75
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼