RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      구성주의 기반의 학습이론 탐구 = A Study on Constructivistic Learning Theories

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101959885

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is to investigate characteristics, commonalities and differences, and instructional implications for designing learner-centered learning environments among new learning theories emerging recently in the field of the psychology of learning. As these emerging theories develop, they increasingly influence the field of educational technology. Included are activity theory, situated cognition theory, distributed cognition theory, and ecological psychology. The emerging theories are viewed as alternative theories to traditional learning theories including behaviorism and cognitivism in the sense that they stick to quite different perspectives from the traditional ones. The new theories share ontological, epistemological, logical, and methodological views and instructional implications with constructivism that traditional objectivists argue is one of epistemology (So we call them constructivistic learning theories). Many differences in terms of learning and activity are found among them as well. Thus, to apply the new theories in the design and development of learner-centered learning environments, it is needed to articulate characteristics, commonalities and differences, and instructional implications among the theories. In doing so, the study can provide instructional designers, educational technologists, and educators with valuable ideas or guidelines to enhance cognition and learning.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to investigate characteristics, commonalities and differences, and instructional implications for designing learner-centered learning environments among new learning theories emerging recently in the field of the psycholog...

      The purpose of this study is to investigate characteristics, commonalities and differences, and instructional implications for designing learner-centered learning environments among new learning theories emerging recently in the field of the psychology of learning. As these emerging theories develop, they increasingly influence the field of educational technology. Included are activity theory, situated cognition theory, distributed cognition theory, and ecological psychology. The emerging theories are viewed as alternative theories to traditional learning theories including behaviorism and cognitivism in the sense that they stick to quite different perspectives from the traditional ones. The new theories share ontological, epistemological, logical, and methodological views and instructional implications with constructivism that traditional objectivists argue is one of epistemology (So we call them constructivistic learning theories). Many differences in terms of learning and activity are found among them as well. Thus, to apply the new theories in the design and development of learner-centered learning environments, it is needed to articulate characteristics, commonalities and differences, and instructional implications among the theories. In doing so, the study can provide instructional designers, educational technologists, and educators with valuable ideas or guidelines to enhance cognition and learning.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 3.7 3.7 3.26
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.89 2.68 3.751 0.75
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼