RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      온라인 수업의 실시간 토론 내용 분석 = Content Analysis of Synchronous Discussions in the Online Learning Community

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101959870

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study analyses the topic and quality of online discussion based on a data set collected from 40 students at an online university in South Korea during the spring semester of 2002. The focus is on whether and how the totpic and quality of online discussion evolve over time and depend on learner characteristics such as gender and age. We sampled 2820 discussion contributions by 21 students over 5 discussion sessions and grouped them into five categories of discussion topic and three evolution stages of online discussion community. We also conducted a post hoc survey in order to compare the perception about online discussion between 21 online discussion participants and 19 non-participants. Surprisingly, the analysis shows more active participation by female students than by male students who are believed to be more familiar with communication and information technologies. Social interaction was the most common type of exchanges in the online discussion, which did not evolve into a more developed stage of information exchange throughout the semester. The age group of 18-25 was the most active in online discussion and the age group of 26-34 kept pace with the evolution of online community. In the survey, participants of online discussion revealed a more positive attitude toward online learning than non-participants. In sum, the study finds that online discussion serves to build an online community but an active role on the part of instructors may be necessary to advance the online community to an effective learning community.
      번역하기

      This study analyses the topic and quality of online discussion based on a data set collected from 40 students at an online university in South Korea during the spring semester of 2002. The focus is on whether and how the totpic and quality of online d...

      This study analyses the topic and quality of online discussion based on a data set collected from 40 students at an online university in South Korea during the spring semester of 2002. The focus is on whether and how the totpic and quality of online discussion evolve over time and depend on learner characteristics such as gender and age. We sampled 2820 discussion contributions by 21 students over 5 discussion sessions and grouped them into five categories of discussion topic and three evolution stages of online discussion community. We also conducted a post hoc survey in order to compare the perception about online discussion between 21 online discussion participants and 19 non-participants. Surprisingly, the analysis shows more active participation by female students than by male students who are believed to be more familiar with communication and information technologies. Social interaction was the most common type of exchanges in the online discussion, which did not evolve into a more developed stage of information exchange throughout the semester. The age group of 18-25 was the most active in online discussion and the age group of 26-34 kept pace with the evolution of online community. In the survey, participants of online discussion revealed a more positive attitude toward online learning than non-participants. In sum, the study finds that online discussion serves to build an online community but an active role on the part of instructors may be necessary to advance the online community to an effective learning community.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 3.7 3.7 3.26
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.89 2.68 3.751 0.75
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼