RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    HRD기업 구성원의 자기주도학습능력 측정도구 개발 연구 = The Development of the Self-Directed Learning Ability Inventory for Employees in HRD Companies

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82534048

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to develop the self-directed learning ability inventory for employees in HRD companies. The target for this study was 360 employees in HRD companies and 356 final data excluding 4 insincere and missing value ones were used for analysis. Inorder to examine the validity level of the using standard for the analysis of data ,a coefficient of correlation was calculated and EFA(Exploratory Factor Analysis) and CFA(Confirmatory Factor Analysis) were conducted. The findings were as followings; First, 7 factors(management of learning process, evaluation of learning outcome, motivation for learning, self concept, continuity of learning activity, using and management of learning resource and making learning environment) were produced with 33 items through exploratory factor analyses. Also items in each factors showed appropriate Cronbach`s alpha values, which means internal consistency of items in each factor was established. Second, through first-order confirmatory factor analysis, there were appropriate relationships between 7 factors with 21 items and all path-coefficients were statistically significant. Model fit indexes showed quiet good(RMR=.031, GFI=.927, CFI=.967, RMSEA=.046). Third, through second-order confirmatory factor analysis, there were appropriate relationships between 3 constructs with 7 factors and all path-coefficients were statistically significant, too. Model fit indexes showed quiet good(RMR=.036, GFI=.916, CFI=.957, RMSEA=.051). Finally, this study discussed practical and theoretical implications for the HRD field.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to develop the self-directed learning ability inventory for employees in HRD companies. The target for this study was 360 employees in HRD companies and 356 final data excluding 4 insincere and missing value ones were use...

    The purpose of this study was to develop the self-directed learning ability inventory for employees in HRD companies. The target for this study was 360 employees in HRD companies and 356 final data excluding 4 insincere and missing value ones were used for analysis. Inorder to examine the validity level of the using standard for the analysis of data ,a coefficient of correlation was calculated and EFA(Exploratory Factor Analysis) and CFA(Confirmatory Factor Analysis) were conducted. The findings were as followings; First, 7 factors(management of learning process, evaluation of learning outcome, motivation for learning, self concept, continuity of learning activity, using and management of learning resource and making learning environment) were produced with 33 items through exploratory factor analyses. Also items in each factors showed appropriate Cronbach`s alpha values, which means internal consistency of items in each factor was established. Second, through first-order confirmatory factor analysis, there were appropriate relationships between 7 factors with 21 items and all path-coefficients were statistically significant. Model fit indexes showed quiet good(RMR=.031, GFI=.927, CFI=.967, RMSEA=.046). Third, through second-order confirmatory factor analysis, there were appropriate relationships between 3 constructs with 7 factors and all path-coefficients were statistically significant, too. Model fit indexes showed quiet good(RMR=.036, GFI=.916, CFI=.957, RMSEA=.051). Finally, this study discussed practical and theoretical implications for the HRD field.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이혜정, "한국 기업의 인적자원개발(HRD) 현황: 2005년도 사업체패널 데이터를 중심으로" 2008 (2008): 78-88, 2008

    2 김지자, "초등학교 교사를 위한 자기주도학습 준비도 측정도구의 개발과 활용방안" 2 (2): 1-25, 1996

    3 이윤옥, "초등학교 고학년용 자기주도학습 지각도 검사개발을 위한 예비연구" 한국아동교육학회 17 (17): 5-18, 2008

    4 김홍원, "자율학습 능력의 개념 정립 및 방법 탐색" 29 : 315-341, 1997

    5 이윤옥, "자기주도학습 개념 분석 및 측정도구 개선방향에 관한 제언" 한국아동교육학회 16 (16): 19-30, 2007

    6 배을규, "인적자원개발론" 학이시습 2009

    7 한국직업능력개발원, "인적자본기업패널 기초분석보고서(2006)" 한국직업능력개발원 2006

    8 유귀옥, "성인학습자의 자기주도성과 인구학적 및 사회 심리학적 변인 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 1997

    9 배영주, "성인의 자기주도학습 과정에 대한 사례 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2003

    10 배을규, "성인교육의 실천적 기초" 학지사 2006

    1 이혜정, "한국 기업의 인적자원개발(HRD) 현황: 2005년도 사업체패널 데이터를 중심으로" 2008 (2008): 78-88, 2008

    2 김지자, "초등학교 교사를 위한 자기주도학습 준비도 측정도구의 개발과 활용방안" 2 (2): 1-25, 1996

    3 이윤옥, "초등학교 고학년용 자기주도학습 지각도 검사개발을 위한 예비연구" 한국아동교육학회 17 (17): 5-18, 2008

    4 김홍원, "자율학습 능력의 개념 정립 및 방법 탐색" 29 : 315-341, 1997

    5 이윤옥, "자기주도학습 개념 분석 및 측정도구 개선방향에 관한 제언" 한국아동교육학회 16 (16): 19-30, 2007

    6 배을규, "인적자원개발론" 학이시습 2009

    7 한국직업능력개발원, "인적자본기업패널 기초분석보고서(2006)" 한국직업능력개발원 2006

    8 유귀옥, "성인학습자의 자기주도성과 인구학적 및 사회 심리학적 변인 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 1997

    9 배영주, "성인의 자기주도학습 과정에 대한 사례 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2003

    10 배을규, "성인교육의 실천적 기초" 학지사 2006

    11 이석재, "생애능력 측정도구 개발 연구: 의사소통력, 문제해결능력, 자기주도적 학습능력을 중심으로" 한국교육개발원 2003

    12 한국노동연구원, "사업체패널조사 2005 기초분석보고서" 한국노동연구원 2008

    13 이진화, "기업체 근로자의 자기주도학습 준비도와 조직특성의 관계" 한국농·산업교육학회 38 (38): 279-304, 2006

    14 박지혜, "기업내 성인학습자의 자기주도성에 관한 연구" 고려대학교 대학원 1998

    15 이학식, "구조방정식 모형분석과 AMOS 6.0" 법문사 2007

    16 홍기칠, "구성주의적 자기주도학습을 위한 학습력 분석과 학습모형 개발" 한국교육심리학회 18 (18): 75-98, 2004

    17 McGoldrick, J., "Theorizing human resource development" 4 (4): 343-356, 2001

    18 Horban, J. D., "The self-directed learning readiness scale: A factor analysis study" 39 : 370-379, 2005

    19 Six, J. E., "The generality of the underlying dimensions of the Oddi continuing learning inventory" 40 (40): 43-51, 1989

    20 Cho, D. Y., "The connection between self-directed learning and the learning organization" 13 (13): 467-470, 2002

    21 Ellinger, A. D., "The concept of self-directed learning and its implications for human resource development" 6 (6): 158-177, 2004

    22 Tough, A., "The adult's learning projects: A fresh approach ti theory and practice in adult learning(2nd ed.)" Lerning Concepts 1979

    23 Grow, G., "Teaching learners to be self-directed: A stage approach" 41 (41): 125-149, 1991

    24 Brockett, R. G., "Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research, and practice" Routledge 1991

    25 Candy, P. C., "Self-direction for lifelong learning" Jossey-Bass 1991

    26 Garrison, D. R., "Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model" 48 (48): 18-33, 1997

    27 Brookfield, S. D., "Self-directed learning: From theory to practice" Jossey-Bass 1985

    28 Cho, D. Y., "Self-directed learning readiness as an antecedent of organizational commitment: A Korean study" 9 (9): 140-152, 2005

    29 Park, S., "Self-directed learning in the workplace" 2008

    30 Confessore, S. J., "Self-directed learning and the learning organization: Examining the connection between the individual and the learning environment" 9 (9): 365-375, 1998

    31 Knowels, M. S., "Self-directed learning" Association Press 1975

    32 Watkins, K. E., "Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systemic change" Jossey-Bass 1993

    33 Guglielmino, L. M., "Productivity in the workplace: The role of self-directed learning and the implications for human resource management" 8 (8): 293-305, 2008

    34 Long, H. B., "Philosophical, psychological and practical justifications for studying self-direction in learning. in: Research and application in self-directed learning" Oklahoma Research Center for Continuing Professional and Education 9-24, 1992

    35 Straka, G. A., "Perceived work conditions and self-directed learning in the process of work" 3 (3): 240-249, 2000

    36 Cummings, T. G., "Organization development & change (9th ed)" South-Western Cengage Learning 2008

    37 Hair, J. F., "Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.)" Pearson Education, Inc 2006

    38 Guglielmino, L. M., "Moving toward a distributed learning model based on self-managed learning" 66 (66): 36-43, 2001

    39 McLagan, P., "Models fo hrd practice" ASTD 1989

    40 Merriam, S. B., "Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (3rd ed.)" Jossey-Bass 2007

    41 Smith, P. J., "Leardership and learning: Facilitating self-drirected learning in enterprises" 31 (31): 324-335, 2007

    42 Beitler, M. A., "Information sharing, self-directed learning and its implications for workplace learning" 19 (19): 526-536, 2007

    43 Werner, J. M., "Human resource development (5th ed)" South-Western Cengage Learning 2009

    44 Clarke, N., "HRD and the challenges of assessing learning in the workplace" 8 (8): 140-156, 2004

    45 Park, J. H., "Employees’ perceived work environment and selfdirected learning readiness in Korean companies" 7 (7): 333-350, 2004

    46 Guglielmino, L. M., "Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale" University of Georgia 1977

    47 Oddi, L. F., "Development of an instrument to measure self-directed continuing learning" Nothern Illinois University 1984

    48 Straka, G. A., "Construct validation of the Oddi Continuing Learning Inventory. in: Current developments in self-directed learning" University of Oklahoma, Public Managers Center, College of Education 1996

    49 Straka, G. A., "Conditions promoting self-directed learning at the workplace" 3 (3): 241-251, 2000

    50 Straka, G. A., "Conceptions of self-directed learning: Theoretical and conceptual considerations" Waxmann 2000

    51 Harvey, B. J., "A confirmatory factor analysis of the Oddi Continuing Learning Inventory(OCLI)" 56 (56): 188-200, 2006

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-12-15 학술지명변경 한글명 : 인력개발연구 -> HRD연구
    외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Human Resource Development -> The Korean Journal of Human Resource Development Quarterly
    KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 2.1 2.1 2.24
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.18 2.1 3.561 0.63
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼