RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    일상인지연구의 인식론적 전제에 관한 고찰 = An Inquiry into Epistemological Premises in the Studies of Everyday Cognition

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82532773

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In this essay, I conduct an epistemological inquiry on some studies of everyday cognition that have survived since 1980s, even though they are a minor field of study. The epistemology operative in these studies is an alternative to traditional epistemology in which individual and situation are entirely separated and individuals are regarded as the unit of analysis. To this end, I first examined the epistemology of Gibson who criticized and tried to overcome the traditional psychology`s epistemology. Gibson developed the concepts ``affordance`` and ``ecological niche`` which made it possible to question and re-inquire on some phenomena such as the individual`s action, cognition and situation. Secondly, I reviewed some studies dealing with so-called ``everyday cognition``: how people can or cannot display their competency in a variety of common settings, such as the workplace of bartenders, diet programs, after-school cooking programs and schools. Thirdly, on the basis of such considerations by examining Gibson`s alternative epistemology and reviewing the studies of everyday cognition, I attempted to provide an elaborate answer to the re-inquire on individual competency and situation. Based on these discussions, I draw the following implications: I first found that dividing everyday cognition and schooled cognition into situation-specific activity vs. situation-free activity leads to a danger of losing the essence of the problem. An epistemology which insists on the dichotomy situation-specific activity vs. situation-free activity prevents us from recognizing school as a specific routine. In other words, activity at school, which is similar to but distinct from daily routine, is accomplished with a unique constellation of tools, mediation and people. Taking a relativistic view of school activity as special routine is only possible when the researcher realizes and reflects on the epistemology that provides a background on his/her research. Secondly, on the basis of the ideas obtained from a review of theoretical accounts of Gibson`s ecological psychology and of a few empirical studies on Everyday Cognition, I discussed what implications those ideas might have on school education and education research.
    번역하기

    In this essay, I conduct an epistemological inquiry on some studies of everyday cognition that have survived since 1980s, even though they are a minor field of study. The epistemology operative in these studies is an alternative to traditional epistem...

    In this essay, I conduct an epistemological inquiry on some studies of everyday cognition that have survived since 1980s, even though they are a minor field of study. The epistemology operative in these studies is an alternative to traditional epistemology in which individual and situation are entirely separated and individuals are regarded as the unit of analysis. To this end, I first examined the epistemology of Gibson who criticized and tried to overcome the traditional psychology`s epistemology. Gibson developed the concepts ``affordance`` and ``ecological niche`` which made it possible to question and re-inquire on some phenomena such as the individual`s action, cognition and situation. Secondly, I reviewed some studies dealing with so-called ``everyday cognition``: how people can or cannot display their competency in a variety of common settings, such as the workplace of bartenders, diet programs, after-school cooking programs and schools. Thirdly, on the basis of such considerations by examining Gibson`s alternative epistemology and reviewing the studies of everyday cognition, I attempted to provide an elaborate answer to the re-inquire on individual competency and situation. Based on these discussions, I draw the following implications: I first found that dividing everyday cognition and schooled cognition into situation-specific activity vs. situation-free activity leads to a danger of losing the essence of the problem. An epistemology which insists on the dichotomy situation-specific activity vs. situation-free activity prevents us from recognizing school as a specific routine. In other words, activity at school, which is similar to but distinct from daily routine, is accomplished with a unique constellation of tools, mediation and people. Taking a relativistic view of school activity as special routine is only possible when the researcher realizes and reflects on the epistemology that provides a background on his/her research. Secondly, on the basis of the ideas obtained from a review of theoretical accounts of Gibson`s ecological psychology and of a few empirical studies on Everyday Cognition, I discussed what implications those ideas might have on school education and education research.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박동섭, "행위, 인지, 학습에 대한 대안적인 인식론으로서의 상황학습론" 한국초등교육학회 21 (21): 177-203, 2008

    2 박동섭, "Vygotsky 아이디어에 기초한 공동문제해결활동에 관한 연구의 발전양태" 한국아동교육학회 17 (17): 163-180, 2008

    3 Wertsch, J. V, "Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action" Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1991

    4 Gibson, J. J, "The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception" Lawrence Erlbaum Associaton 1979

    5 Wittgenstein, L, "Philosophical investigations" Oxford: Basil Blackwell and Mott 1972

    6 Geertz, C, "Local knowledge: further essays in interpretative anthropology" New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston 1983

    7 McDermott, R. P, "Institutionalized Psychology and the Ethnography of Schooling. In Children in and out of school: Ethnography and education" Center for Applied Linguistics 232-249, 1982

    8 Park, D. S, "Dynamics of situation definition" 13 (13): 101-129, 2006

    9 Cole, M, "Culture and Thought" John Willey & Sons 1974

    10 Cole, M, "Cultural Amplifiers Reconsidered. In The Social foundations of Language and Thought" N. Y:Norton 343-364, 1980

    1 박동섭, "행위, 인지, 학습에 대한 대안적인 인식론으로서의 상황학습론" 한국초등교육학회 21 (21): 177-203, 2008

    2 박동섭, "Vygotsky 아이디어에 기초한 공동문제해결활동에 관한 연구의 발전양태" 한국아동교육학회 17 (17): 163-180, 2008

    3 Wertsch, J. V, "Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action" Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1991

    4 Gibson, J. J, "The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception" Lawrence Erlbaum Associaton 1979

    5 Wittgenstein, L, "Philosophical investigations" Oxford: Basil Blackwell and Mott 1972

    6 Geertz, C, "Local knowledge: further essays in interpretative anthropology" New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston 1983

    7 McDermott, R. P, "Institutionalized Psychology and the Ethnography of Schooling. In Children in and out of school: Ethnography and education" Center for Applied Linguistics 232-249, 1982

    8 Park, D. S, "Dynamics of situation definition" 13 (13): 101-129, 2006

    9 Cole, M, "Culture and Thought" John Willey & Sons 1974

    10 Cole, M, "Cultural Amplifiers Reconsidered. In The Social foundations of Language and Thought" N. Y:Norton 343-364, 1980

    11 Cole, M, "Comparative Cognitive Research: Learning from a Learning Disabled Child. In Aspects of the Development of Competence" 14 : 125-154, 1981

    12 Norman, D. A, "Cognitive Artifacts" 1989

    13 Lave, J, "Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life" Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997

    14 Beach, K. D, "Becoming a bartender: The role of external mnemonic symbols in acquiring an occupation" 7 : 191-204, 1993

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.84 1.84 1.82
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.82 1.8 2.264 0.23
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼