RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    시장경제 제도로의 전환을 위한 법제도 구축 = Constructing a Legal System for the Transition to a Market Economy

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101892256

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The aim of this paper is to draw the implications of North Korea settling as a market economy system by taking a look at case stories of what kind of legal-system changes transition countries have attempted in order to change to a market economy. The study examined the legislation and revision procedure of legal systems each transition country went through upon the transform from a centrally-planned- economy system to a market-economy one. A research was conducted on what the procedures were for international communities in providing legal-system support for transition countries for them to build a legal system that would bring about change to a market-economy system. Taking a look at the efforts each East-European country made to enter the market-economy system, one notices they established a Capitalist market- economy system by adapting legal systems which abolished planned economy and guaranteed private property during the system-transition period in the early 1990s. Through revisions of the constitution, the Eastern Europe Empire introduced the market-economy principles, guaranteed private property rights and also permitted freedom to conduct various economic activities, including profit seeking and free competition. If North Korea conducts reform and introduces an open-door policy in the future, one of the biggest obstacles will be the matter of how it will keep in order the laws on reform and open trade doors. As it can be seen in the cases of former East-European countries, Vietnam, and, of course, China, reform and open-trade-door policies are not a simple, one-way straight line, but they are bound to follow a screw-shaped route which develops undergoing countless trials and errors. In attaining such reform and open- door policies, the most important occasion or turning point is the establishment, revision, and abolishment of related laws.
    번역하기

    The aim of this paper is to draw the implications of North Korea settling as a market economy system by taking a look at case stories of what kind of legal-system changes transition countries have attempted in order to change to a market economy. The ...

    The aim of this paper is to draw the implications of North Korea settling as a market economy system by taking a look at case stories of what kind of legal-system changes transition countries have attempted in order to change to a market economy. The study examined the legislation and revision procedure of legal systems each transition country went through upon the transform from a centrally-planned- economy system to a market-economy one. A research was conducted on what the procedures were for international communities in providing legal-system support for transition countries for them to build a legal system that would bring about change to a market-economy system. Taking a look at the efforts each East-European country made to enter the market-economy system, one notices they established a Capitalist market- economy system by adapting legal systems which abolished planned economy and guaranteed private property during the system-transition period in the early 1990s. Through revisions of the constitution, the Eastern Europe Empire introduced the market-economy principles, guaranteed private property rights and also permitted freedom to conduct various economic activities, including profit seeking and free competition. If North Korea conducts reform and introduces an open-door policy in the future, one of the biggest obstacles will be the matter of how it will keep in order the laws on reform and open trade doors. As it can be seen in the cases of former East-European countries, Vietnam, and, of course, China, reform and open-trade-door policies are not a simple, one-way straight line, but they are bound to follow a screw-shaped route which develops undergoing countless trials and errors. In attaining such reform and open- door policies, the most important occasion or turning point is the establishment, revision, and abolishment of related laws.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "한종만 외 2인 譯 독립국가연합 경제의 구조와 전망」" 1992

    2 "통일연구원 남북한 통합을 위한 법제도 인프라 확충방안" 2005

    3 "통일독일의 구동독 체제불법청산 개관" 1995

    4 "체제전환국의 경제특구 개발과 북한 경제특구개발에 대한 시사점: 폴란드와 중국 경제특구 개발의 수요와 공급을 중심으로" 4 : 2004

    5 "체제전환국 법제정비지원, 단행본" 서울대학교출판부 2006

    6 "소련법연구 -사회주의법의 특성법제개혁사법제도-" 법무부 법무자료 138 : 1991

    7 "사회주의 국유기업의 사유화에 관한 연구" 1996

    8 "베트남 改革開放法制 槪觀" 2005

    9 "민족통일연구원 사회주의체제 개혁개방사례 비교연구" 1993

    10 "동서독간 경협활성화 지원정책과 시사점" (7․8월호) : 2001

    1 "한종만 외 2인 譯 독립국가연합 경제의 구조와 전망」" 1992

    2 "통일연구원 남북한 통합을 위한 법제도 인프라 확충방안" 2005

    3 "통일독일의 구동독 체제불법청산 개관" 1995

    4 "체제전환국의 경제특구 개발과 북한 경제특구개발에 대한 시사점: 폴란드와 중국 경제특구 개발의 수요와 공급을 중심으로" 4 : 2004

    5 "체제전환국 법제정비지원, 단행본" 서울대학교출판부 2006

    6 "소련법연구 -사회주의법의 특성법제개혁사법제도-" 법무부 법무자료 138 : 1991

    7 "사회주의 국유기업의 사유화에 관한 연구" 1996

    8 "베트남 改革開放法制 槪觀" 2005

    9 "민족통일연구원 사회주의체제 개혁개방사례 비교연구" 1993

    10 "동서독간 경협활성화 지원정책과 시사점" (7․8월호) : 2001

    11 "공산권 붕괴에 따른 동구제국 형법의 변화" 한국형사정책연구원 1996

    12 "東歐諸國 體制改革 槪觀" 1996

    13 "“폴란드의 합작투자법 개정안 국회통과" 통 (통): 1991

    14 "“사회주의권의 변화와 사회주의 법원리의 변화" 1992

    15 "The World Bank and Legal Technical Assistance: Initial Lessons" 1995

    16 "Project Information Document" 2003

    17 "Project Appraisal Document" 2001

    18 "Program Information Document" 2001

    19 "Program Document" 2003

    20 "Program Document" 2004

    21 "Privatisierung in Osteuropa-eine typologische Skizze-" Jahrgang Heft 45 : 1999

    22 "Initiatives in Legal and Judicial Reform" 2004

    23 "2000년 베트남외국인투자법제에관한연구" 부산: 부산외국어대학교 비교법연구소 13 : 2002

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.8 0.8 0.84
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.87 1.29 1.221 0.13
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼