성취 기준 중심 국어과 교육과정 구성에 대한 비판적 고찰 = A Critical Review of Standards-based Curriculum for Korean Language

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study was to review New Korean language curriculum in terms of socioeconomic context of standards-based education system, concept and scope of standards. The movement embracing standard-based education is possible from a social point of view in which economic effect of education is considered and feasibility and responsibility are emphasized. Standards-based education encompasses content standards, performance standards and opportunity-to-learn standards. Standards-based education was applied to Korean language under the 7th national curriculum to evaluate student performance. Under the curriculum, content standards are emphasized as far as standards-based education is concerned. However, the debate on the effects of standards-based education continues. Many scholars stress that standardized education will result in halted improvement of education system and that as the government is playing the leading role in development and operating the education system, there is no need for standardizing the education. They also point out issues involving standardization, justification, performance standards, students who fail to meet performance standards, localization and individualization of standards and standards for learning opportunities. It is therefore necessary to develop solutions for meeting preset standards.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "새 국어과 교육과정의 비판적 점검" 우리말현장학회 2007

2 "미국의 기준 운동에 비추어 본 한국의 절대평가기준 개발" 한국교육과정학회 17 (17): 339-362, 1999

3 "미국, 영국, 일본의 역사교육과정 동향" 역사교육연구회 71 : 185-234, 1999

4 "국어과 절대평가 성취 기준 개발 방안" 청람어문교육학회 20 : 239-259, 1998

5 "국어과 교육과정 실행 연구" 서울: 박이정 2002

6 "국가 수준의 ‘성취 기준 및 평가 기준’ 개발에 대한 고찰" 한국교육평가학회 11 (11): 47-73, 1998

7 "국가 수준 국어과 교육성취도 평가의 실제와 발전 방안 -평가 문항을 중심으로-" 국어교육학회 20 : 237-265, 2004

8 "교육과정 성취 기준 논쟁의 동향 및 평가" 한국교육학회 11 (11): 215-236, 2005

9 "교육과정 국가기준으로서의 성취 기준의 재음미" 한국교육과정학회 2007

10 "what every American needs to know" 1987

11 "and the future of English'" 23-29, 1994

12 "Using a flat structure in a hierarchical world the development of English standards" 70 (70): 129-135, 1997

13 "Thinking about standards" 79 (79): 184-189, 1997

14 "The case for integrated standards in English Language Arts" 73 (73): 20-29, 1996

15 "The McREL Database: A tool for constructing local standards" 52 (52): 42-47, 1995

16 "Standards for the English Language Arts" NCTE & IRA 1996

17 "Standards for education" Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution 94-119, 1995

18 "Realizing the promise of standards-based education" 56 (56): 17-21, 1999

19 "Raising the standards for standards A call for definitions" 37 (37): 223-243, 2005

20 "One person's opinion" 85 (85): 15-16, 1996

21 "New guidelines on English a sketch, not a blueprint" New York Times 12-, 1996.3.12

22 "National standards in American education" Washington, D. C.: The Brookings Institution 1995

23 "National and state standards: the problems and the promise" 81 : 26-41, 1997

24 "Ideology in Discourses" 1990

25 "IRA, standards, and educational reform" 49 (49): 290-298, 1995

26 "Exploring Language Arts standards within a cycle of learning" 73 (73): 10-13, 1996

27 "Core knowledge & standards: A conversation with E. D. hirsch Jr." 56 (56): 28-31, 1999

28 "Content knowledge" Aurora: McRel, Inc. 1997

29 "A devil's advocate position on standards" 28-30, 1994

30 "A Nation at Risk United States Department of Education" 1983

31 "'Standards for the English language arts Journal of Reading Behavior 25" 457-475, 1993

32 "'National standards in English" 25-30, 1994