RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    재미 교포 초급 학습자와 비교포 초급 학습자의 한국어 능력 비교

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104068198

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Lee, Haiyoung. 2010. 10. 30. The Comparison on the Korean language proficiency of American heritage learners and that of non-heritage learners in their beginning level. Bilingual Research 44, 275-294. The Korean proficiency of heritage learners appears different from that of non-heritage learners. It seems that this difference comes from the rich-input language environment where heritage learners are provided with at home. The distinction of language environment will affect on the learners’ verbal competence, especially on their listening competence. This can also explain why heritage learners show their better listening competence than their counterparts do in the class. Therefore we could expect that heritage learners may get the higher scores in the TOPIK test compared to non-heritage learners. One could predict that these two groups will show even greater gap especially in the listening test. However could we identify our expectation to the actual test results of these two groups? If the language proficiency difference was based upon the difference of language environment, the difference of Korean language use could be related to the geographical difference. Would the Korean proficiency of heritage learners in the higher occupancy ratio area of Korean Americans be higher than that in the less densely populated areas. Since the districts of Korean consulate General in LA and New York have more Korean Americans compared to other areas, the heritage learners in these areas are expected to hold the higher Korean language competence. Upon these expectations, we would like to present the two research questions on general heritage learners’ language proficiency and those of heritage learners in the densely populated area of Korean Americans such as New York and LA as below. (1) Do Korean heritage learners and non-heritage learners show distinction in their Korean language proficiency by language skills? (2) Do heritage learners of Korean in LA and New York where Korean Americans are densely populated hold the higher test scores than those in other areas? (Ewha Womans University)
    번역하기

    Lee, Haiyoung. 2010. 10. 30. The Comparison on the Korean language proficiency of American heritage learners and that of non-heritage learners in their beginning level. Bilingual Research 44, 275-294. The Korean proficiency of heritage learners appear...

    Lee, Haiyoung. 2010. 10. 30. The Comparison on the Korean language proficiency of American heritage learners and that of non-heritage learners in their beginning level. Bilingual Research 44, 275-294. The Korean proficiency of heritage learners appears different from that of non-heritage learners. It seems that this difference comes from the rich-input language environment where heritage learners are provided with at home. The distinction of language environment will affect on the learners’ verbal competence, especially on their listening competence. This can also explain why heritage learners show their better listening competence than their counterparts do in the class. Therefore we could expect that heritage learners may get the higher scores in the TOPIK test compared to non-heritage learners. One could predict that these two groups will show even greater gap especially in the listening test. However could we identify our expectation to the actual test results of these two groups? If the language proficiency difference was based upon the difference of language environment, the difference of Korean language use could be related to the geographical difference. Would the Korean proficiency of heritage learners in the higher occupancy ratio area of Korean Americans be higher than that in the less densely populated areas. Since the districts of Korean consulate General in LA and New York have more Korean Americans compared to other areas, the heritage learners in these areas are expected to hold the higher Korean language competence. Upon these expectations, we would like to present the two research questions on general heritage learners’ language proficiency and those of heritage learners in the densely populated area of Korean Americans such as New York and LA as below. (1) Do Korean heritage learners and non-heritage learners show distinction in their Korean language proficiency by language skills? (2) Do heritage learners of Korean in LA and New York where Korean Americans are densely populated hold the higher test scores than those in other areas? (Ewha Womans University)

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이해영, "한국어 학습자의 시제표현 문법항목 발달패턴 연구 in: 한국어 학습자의 중간언어 연구" 커뮤니케이션북스 267-300, 2005

    2 이정은, "재외동포의 이중언어상용 상황과한국어 학습 양상의 특이성 -질적 연구 방법을 통한 교육 현장 사례 분석을 중심으로-" 한국사회언어학회 13 (13): 193-218, 2005

    3 홍애란, "재미동포 청소년 학습자를 위한 한국어 읽기 교육 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2006

    4 이해영, "외국인 근로자 자녀를 위한 한국어 교육-재한몽골학교 운영 사례를 중심으로-" 이중언어학회 (33) : 467-494, 2007

    5 Sohn, S, "True beginners, false beginners, and fake beginners:Placement strategies for Korean heritage learners" 40 (40): 407-418, 2007

    6 Cho,G, "The Role of Heritage Language in Social Interactions and Relationships: Reflections from a Language Minority Group" 24 (24): 333-348, 2000

    7 Kim, K., "Korean-Americans in Los Angeles: Their concerns and language maintenance" National Center for Bilingual Research 1981

    8 Matsunaga,S, "Instructional Needs of College-Level Learners of Japanese as a Heritage Language: Performance-Based Analyses, The Heritage Language Journal"

    9 Yun,X, "Heritage Learners in the Chinese Language Classroom: Home Background, The Heritage Language Journal"

    10 Lee, H., "A Genre-Based Study of Oral Presentation & Its Pedagogical Implications" 13 : 21-42, 2008

    1 이해영, "한국어 학습자의 시제표현 문법항목 발달패턴 연구 in: 한국어 학습자의 중간언어 연구" 커뮤니케이션북스 267-300, 2005

    2 이정은, "재외동포의 이중언어상용 상황과한국어 학습 양상의 특이성 -질적 연구 방법을 통한 교육 현장 사례 분석을 중심으로-" 한국사회언어학회 13 (13): 193-218, 2005

    3 홍애란, "재미동포 청소년 학습자를 위한 한국어 읽기 교육 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2006

    4 이해영, "외국인 근로자 자녀를 위한 한국어 교육-재한몽골학교 운영 사례를 중심으로-" 이중언어학회 (33) : 467-494, 2007

    5 Sohn, S, "True beginners, false beginners, and fake beginners:Placement strategies for Korean heritage learners" 40 (40): 407-418, 2007

    6 Cho,G, "The Role of Heritage Language in Social Interactions and Relationships: Reflections from a Language Minority Group" 24 (24): 333-348, 2000

    7 Kim, K., "Korean-Americans in Los Angeles: Their concerns and language maintenance" National Center for Bilingual Research 1981

    8 Matsunaga,S, "Instructional Needs of College-Level Learners of Japanese as a Heritage Language: Performance-Based Analyses, The Heritage Language Journal"

    9 Yun,X, "Heritage Learners in the Chinese Language Classroom: Home Background, The Heritage Language Journal"

    10 Lee, H., "A Genre-Based Study of Oral Presentation & Its Pedagogical Implications" 13 : 21-42, 2008

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.01 1.01 1.05
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.05 1 1.563 0.13
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼