RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      의약분업정책과 사회적 갈등

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82411311

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Severe conflicts took place between civil society and medical doctors, when the government tried to implement the policy of dividing prescription and preparation of drugs between doctors and pharmacists. The conflicts were developed in the 3 aspects, such as between doctors and pharmacists, between civil organizations and medical doctors, and among doctors themselves. Medical doctors argued the tight regulation of pharmacists' illegal prescribing behavior, but their concern was related to their discontents with low fee schedules of the health insurance system. However, the more fundamental feature the conflicts could be found in lowering socioeconomic status of doctors due to the growth of the hospital and pharmaceutical capital. Another factor to lead the conflicts was the growth of civil concern on health affairs and civil organizations' initiative to promote health care reform. Medical doctors were not prepared with handling this civil initiative and were reluctant to accepting their active role in formulating health policies. Thus the conflicts were inevitable.
      번역하기

      Severe conflicts took place between civil society and medical doctors, when the government tried to implement the policy of dividing prescription and preparation of drugs between doctors and pharmacists. The conflicts were developed in the 3 aspects, ...

      Severe conflicts took place between civil society and medical doctors, when the government tried to implement the policy of dividing prescription and preparation of drugs between doctors and pharmacists. The conflicts were developed in the 3 aspects, such as between doctors and pharmacists, between civil organizations and medical doctors, and among doctors themselves. Medical doctors argued the tight regulation of pharmacists' illegal prescribing behavior, but their concern was related to their discontents with low fee schedules of the health insurance system. However, the more fundamental feature the conflicts could be found in lowering socioeconomic status of doctors due to the growth of the hospital and pharmaceutical capital. Another factor to lead the conflicts was the growth of civil concern on health affairs and civil organizations' initiative to promote health care reform. Medical doctors were not prepared with handling this civil initiative and were reluctant to accepting their active role in formulating health policies. Thus the conflicts were inevitable.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 의약분업이 초래한 사회적 갈등
      • 2. 의료체계의 모순과 의료개혁
      • 3. 의약분업정책의 전개
      • 4. 갈등의 시발 : 의사와 약사 사이의 갈등
      • 5. 갈등의 전개 : 의권투쟁
      • 1. 의약분업이 초래한 사회적 갈등
      • 2. 의료체계의 모순과 의료개혁
      • 3. 의약분업정책의 전개
      • 4. 갈등의 시발 : 의사와 약사 사이의 갈등
      • 5. 갈등의 전개 : 의권투쟁
      • 6. 의료계 내부의 갈등
      • 7. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      • ABSTRACT
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼