There are two concepts that seem to figure prominently in most theories of curriculum construction: ‘ academic discipline’ and ‘school subject’. However, much discussion of curriculum development has rarely analyzed conceptual differences betw...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82391147
2010
-
300
KCI등재
학술저널
107-125(19쪽)
25
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
There are two concepts that seem to figure prominently in most theories of curriculum construction: ‘ academic discipline’ and ‘school subject’. However, much discussion of curriculum development has rarely analyzed conceptual differences betw...
There are two concepts that seem to figure prominently in most theories of curriculum construction: ‘ academic discipline’ and ‘school subject’. However, much discussion of curriculum development has rarely analyzed conceptual differences between these two concepts, and has accepted an unproblematized reliance on the academic disciplines as the source of curricular content. The purpose of this study is to disclose the differences between academic discipline and school subject, and to discuss implications that this distinction gives to curriculum development. For research purposes, first, I suggest a range of possibilities regarding the relationship between the academic discipline and its related school subject. And then, I examine the reason that school subject should be distinguished from academic discipline with reference to three aspect s: educational context, curriculum development process, and teacher professionalism. I conclude with a discussion of implications of the distinction argument between academic discipline and school subject for curriculum development.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 소경희, "학교지식의 변화요구에 따른 대안적 교육과정 설계방향 탐색" 한국교육과정학회 24 (24): 39-59, 2006
2 홍후조, "국가교육과정기준의 연구 개발에서 총론과 각론의 관계. in: 국가 교육과정 포럼 운영 종합 보고서" 177-211, 2009
3 이홍우, "교육과정: 개관. in: 교육학대백과사전1" 하우동설 530-543, 1998
4 이돈희, "교과학 기초 연구" 한국교육개발원 1997
5 박인기, "교과의 생태와 교과의 진화 -교과의 개념에 대한 패러다임 변화와 국어교과의 진화 조건-" 국어교육학회 34 (34): 309-343, 2009
6 이돈희, "교과교육학의 성격과 과제. in: 교과교육학탐구" 교육과학사 9-35, 1994
7 강현석, "교과교육학의 새로운 패러다임" 아카데미프레스 2006
8 김승호, "교과교육론 서설" 한국교육과정학회 27 (27): 83-106, 2009
9 Stengel, B., "‘Academic discipline’ and ‘school subject’:contestable curricular concepts" 29 (29): 585-602, 1997
10 Pinar, W., "What is curriculum theory?" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2004
1 소경희, "학교지식의 변화요구에 따른 대안적 교육과정 설계방향 탐색" 한국교육과정학회 24 (24): 39-59, 2006
2 홍후조, "국가교육과정기준의 연구 개발에서 총론과 각론의 관계. in: 국가 교육과정 포럼 운영 종합 보고서" 177-211, 2009
3 이홍우, "교육과정: 개관. in: 교육학대백과사전1" 하우동설 530-543, 1998
4 이돈희, "교과학 기초 연구" 한국교육개발원 1997
5 박인기, "교과의 생태와 교과의 진화 -교과의 개념에 대한 패러다임 변화와 국어교과의 진화 조건-" 국어교육학회 34 (34): 309-343, 2009
6 이돈희, "교과교육학의 성격과 과제. in: 교과교육학탐구" 교육과학사 9-35, 1994
7 강현석, "교과교육학의 새로운 패러다임" 아카데미프레스 2006
8 김승호, "교과교육론 서설" 한국교육과정학회 27 (27): 83-106, 2009
9 Stengel, B., "‘Academic discipline’ and ‘school subject’:contestable curricular concepts" 29 (29): 585-602, 1997
10 Pinar, W., "What is curriculum theory?" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2004
11 Deng, Z., "Transforming the subject matter: Examining the intellectual roots of pedagogical content knowledge" 37 (37): 279-295, 2007
12 Kliebard, H., "The struggle for the American curriculum 1893-1958" Routledge Falmer 2004
13 Dewey, J., "The psychological aspect of the school curriculum. in: The early works of John Dewey 1882-1898:Vol. 5. 1895-1898" Southern Illinois University Press 1972
14 Bruner, J., "The process of education" Vintage 1960
15 Hirst, P., "The logic of education" Routledge 1970
16 Deng, Z., "The formation of a school subject and the nature of curriculum content: An analysis of liberal studies in Hong Kong" 41 (41): 585-604, 2009
17 Noddings, N., "The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education" Teachers College Press 1992
18 Deng, Z., "Subject matter: Defining and theorizing school subjects. in: The SAGE handbook of curriculum and instruction" Sage 66-87, 2008
19 Deng, Z., "School subject and academic disciplines: The differences. in: Development of a set of principles to guide a P-12 syllabus framework: A report to the Queensland Studies Authority Queensland, Australia" Queensland Studies Authority 86-113, 2008
20 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, "Professional standards for teaching mathematics" NCTM 1991
21 Schulman, L., "Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform" 57 (57): 1-22, 1987
22 Dewey, J., "How we think" Prometheus 1991
23 Dewey, J., "Experience and education: The 60th anniversary edition" Kappa Delta Pi 1998
24 Tanner, D., "Curriculum development: Theory into practice(3rd ed.)" Merrill 1995
25 Tyler, R., "Basic principles of curriculum and instruction" University of Chicago Press 1949
26 Luke, A., "A set of principles to guide a P-12 syllabus framework. in: Development of a set of principles to guide a P-12 syllabus framework: A report to the Queensland Studies Authority Queensland, Australia" Queensland Studies Authority 8-71, 2008
지식과 이데올로기: Karl Mannheim 지식사회학의 교육과정학적 함의
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2021-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2018-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2015-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2011-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2005-05-31 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Journal of Curriculum Studies | ![]() |
| 2005-01-01 | 등재 | 신청제한 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2001-07-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2.81 | 2.81 | 2.75 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 2.65 | 2.69 | 3.561 | 0.48 |