RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    국방 핵심기술 기초연구 수행기관 선정 평가지표 개발 = The Development of Evaluation Indicators to Select the Basic Research Institute in Defense Core Technology

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82341161

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study design new evaluation indicators for the proposal of the basic research in defense core technology. The selection procedure of basic research project have been accomplished mainly by experience of experts working at identical area. In general, evaluation indicators play a key role on selecting the projects. In order to select excellent institute, evaluation indicators require systematical and professional approach.
    To satisfy this kind of purpose, we have developed indicators that derives evaluation lists through gathering opinions from defense field experts, and through consideration of priorities and weight of derived lists, using AHP method.
    번역하기

    This study design new evaluation indicators for the proposal of the basic research in defense core technology. The selection procedure of basic research project have been accomplished mainly by experience of experts working at identical area. In gener...

    This study design new evaluation indicators for the proposal of the basic research in defense core technology. The selection procedure of basic research project have been accomplished mainly by experience of experts working at identical area. In general, evaluation indicators play a key role on selecting the projects. In order to select excellent institute, evaluation indicators require systematical and professional approach.
    To satisfy this kind of purpose, we have developed indicators that derives evaluation lists through gathering opinions from defense field experts, and through consideration of priorities and weight of derived lists, using AHP method.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 국방 연구개발
    • 3. 수행기관 선정평가
    • 4. 평가지표 개발
    • 5. 연구모형 설계
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 국방 연구개발
    • 3. 수행기관 선정평가
    • 4. 평가지표 개발
    • 5. 연구모형 설계
    • 6. 실증분석
    • 7. 평가지표의 활용
    • 8. 결론
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼