RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      초등학교 국어 수업 컨설팅에 대한 수요자 요구 분석 = A survey of elementary school teachers on the need for instructional consultation in Korean

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106570107

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper researches the present instructional supervision in elementary schools and the need for instructional consultation in Korean. The participants comprised 482 teachers from 14 elementary schools in the areas of Seoul, Incheon and Gyeonggi. Following are the results that were obtained.
      We found that the elementary school teachers had experienced various types of instructional supervision related to their professional career as a teacher. The most preferred method of supervision was self-directed development, followed by colleague supervision, teacher-demanded supervision and so on. Further, their responses to the supervision were more affirmative than negative. They believed that such elements were important as they focussed on the willingness and preparation of themselves, the speciality of the advisors and the comfortable atmosphere for discussion after workshop classes.
      Most elementary school teachers thought that instructional consultation in Korean was necessary and desired in order to improve their teaching skills depending on the content of the subject. The strand in which they wished for maximum consultation was 'speaking': their reasons for the same were as follows: (1) 'not having considerable knowledge on how to use textbooks and produce teaching and learning materials' and (2) 'it is the most important strand among the 6 strands'. With regard to managing the instruction, they preferred consultation pertaining to 'question and feedback' the most, followed by 'motivation', 'attracting attention' and 'guiding learning activities'.
      The most preferred consultant was an expert teacher. Moreover, the most preferred time for consultation was during the term and through in-service teacher training programmes. Many respondents chose the option 'as and when necessary' as the proper frequency for the consultation. In addition, most teachers preferred face-to-face consultation, aided by the videos and materials of a class. The primary elements for the success of instructional consultation were institutional backup, teachers' willingness and the speciality of the consultants. With regard to utilising the outcomes of the consultation, most teachers preferred that it be used for in-service teacher training programmes and for teacher's guide books.
      번역하기

      This paper researches the present instructional supervision in elementary schools and the need for instructional consultation in Korean. The participants comprised 482 teachers from 14 elementary schools in the areas of Seoul, Incheon and Gyeonggi. Fo...

      This paper researches the present instructional supervision in elementary schools and the need for instructional consultation in Korean. The participants comprised 482 teachers from 14 elementary schools in the areas of Seoul, Incheon and Gyeonggi. Following are the results that were obtained.
      We found that the elementary school teachers had experienced various types of instructional supervision related to their professional career as a teacher. The most preferred method of supervision was self-directed development, followed by colleague supervision, teacher-demanded supervision and so on. Further, their responses to the supervision were more affirmative than negative. They believed that such elements were important as they focussed on the willingness and preparation of themselves, the speciality of the advisors and the comfortable atmosphere for discussion after workshop classes.
      Most elementary school teachers thought that instructional consultation in Korean was necessary and desired in order to improve their teaching skills depending on the content of the subject. The strand in which they wished for maximum consultation was 'speaking': their reasons for the same were as follows: (1) 'not having considerable knowledge on how to use textbooks and produce teaching and learning materials' and (2) 'it is the most important strand among the 6 strands'. With regard to managing the instruction, they preferred consultation pertaining to 'question and feedback' the most, followed by 'motivation', 'attracting attention' and 'guiding learning activities'.
      The most preferred consultant was an expert teacher. Moreover, the most preferred time for consultation was during the term and through in-service teacher training programmes. Many respondents chose the option 'as and when necessary' as the proper frequency for the consultation. In addition, most teachers preferred face-to-face consultation, aided by the videos and materials of a class. The primary elements for the success of instructional consultation were institutional backup, teachers' willingness and the speciality of the consultants. With regard to utilising the outcomes of the consultation, most teachers preferred that it be used for in-service teacher training programmes and for teacher's guide books.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "학교 컨설팅과 컨설팅 장학" 서울특별시교육연수원 179-192, 2006

      2 "학교 컨설팅" 학지사 2002

      3 "컨설팅 장학의 개념 탐색" 23 (23): 1-25, 2005

      4 "초등 국어 교사 교육 프로그램의 운용 방안" 국어교육학회 19 : 63-90, 2004

      5 "창의성 계발을 위한 국어과 교수학습 전략" 사회평론 2006

      6 "제4장, 제3절, 국어 교수 학습의 발전 방향: 장학과 연구를 중심으로" 267-284, 2005

      7 "장학과 교사의 수업의 질 향상을 위한 수업관찰과 분석" 원미사 1998

      8 "예비교사와 현장교사를 위한 초등 국어과 교수학습 방법" 박이정 2005

      9 "수업 효과의 평가 방법" 한국교원대학교 교육연구원 20 (20): 1-21, 2004

      10 "수업 컨설팅의 개념과 운영 방안" 서울특별시교육연수원 18-22, 2006

      1 "학교 컨설팅과 컨설팅 장학" 서울특별시교육연수원 179-192, 2006

      2 "학교 컨설팅" 학지사 2002

      3 "컨설팅 장학의 개념 탐색" 23 (23): 1-25, 2005

      4 "초등 국어 교사 교육 프로그램의 운용 방안" 국어교육학회 19 : 63-90, 2004

      5 "창의성 계발을 위한 국어과 교수학습 전략" 사회평론 2006

      6 "제4장, 제3절, 국어 교수 학습의 발전 방향: 장학과 연구를 중심으로" 267-284, 2005

      7 "장학과 교사의 수업의 질 향상을 위한 수업관찰과 분석" 원미사 1998

      8 "예비교사와 현장교사를 위한 초등 국어과 교수학습 방법" 박이정 2005

      9 "수업 효과의 평가 방법" 한국교원대학교 교육연구원 20 (20): 1-21, 2004

      10 "수업 컨설팅의 개념과 운영 방안" 서울특별시교육연수원 18-22, 2006

      11 "수업 장학과 수업 분석" 학지사 2005

      12 "국어교육론 1: 국어 교과 교육론" 한국문화사 2005

      13 "국어과 수업 모형" 삼지원 2005

      14 "국어과 교수학습 방법 구성의 원리" 국어교육학회 24 : 297-324, 2005

      15 "국어과 교수-학습 방법론에 대한 비판적 고찰" 한국어교육학회 118 : 31-64, 2005

      16 "국어과 교수 학습의 방향" 한국문화사 193-222, 2002

      17 "국어 수업 방법" 박이정 1997

      18 "교과장학의 절차와 기법" 한국교육생산성연구소 교육연구사 10 (10): 39-63, 1997

      19 "교과장학의 이론과 실제" 서울특별시 교육연구원 1996

      20 "교과 장학 시론 국어과를 중심으로" 서울대학교 사범대학 국어교육과 25 : 1997

      21 "Strategies for Teachers: Teaching Content and Thinking Skills(4th ed.)" Boston: Allyn and Bacon 2001

      22 "Routledge International Companion to Education" London and New York: Routledge 2000

      23 "Primary Education" 602-620, 2000

      24 "Preparing Teachers for a Changing World What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able to Do" San Francisco, C.A.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2005

      25 "Mother tongue teaching" 773-800, 2000

      26 "Mentor Courses: A Resource Book for Trainer-Trainers" Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999

      27 "Learning and Instruction: Theroy into Practice" Saddle River. N.J.: Pearson Education, Inc. 2005

      28 "How is language used as a medium for classroom education?" 109-127, 2000

      29 "Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research" Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers 2006

      30 "Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice for Effective Instruction" 2004

      31 "Advising and Supporting Teachers" Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-05-16 학술지등록 한글명 : 한국초등국어교육
      외국어명 : Jounal of Elementary Korean Education
      KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.9 0.9 1.05
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.98 0.94 1.458 0.15
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼