국가연구개발 성과추적평가관리 시스템 모형 및 활용

국문 초록 (Abstract)

2005년‘국가연구개발사업 등의 성과평가 및 성과관리에 관한 법률’이 제정되고, 이를 수행하기 위한‘연구성과관리활용기본계획(안)’이 수립되면서 연구개발성과관리 및 활용 그리고 이에 대한 체계적인 관리가 본격화되고 있다. 본 연구는 관련 법령과‘연구성과관리활용기본계획(안)’의 기본 목적에 부합하면서 성과 활용가능성이 크게 요구되고 있는 산업기술분야의 국가연구개발 성과 확산을 촉진할 수 있는 추적평가관리체계 모형과 본 모형을 현행 연구기관평가체계와 양립할 수 있는 세 가지 적용방안을 제안한다. 특히, 국가 연구개발사업 및 과제의 성과에 대한 체계적이고 합리적인 추적평가를 위하여 AHP 및 DEA 등 계량적 방법론을 활용 상대 평가할 수 있는 방안을 제시한다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Korean government established ‘the Act on Performance Evaluation and Management for National Research & Development (R&D) Programs’ in 2005, and one year later constructed a master plan, ‘A Basic Plan for the Management and Utilization of R&D performance’ that focused on better diffusing the public R&D outcomes. In this study, we propose a model of performance monitoring, evaluation, and management system for national R&D, which is based on a systematic approach and the logic model that has been prevalently used in planning and evaluating the public programs, to meet the purpose of the law and the master plan as well as to facilitate the diffusion of national R&D outcomes focused mainly on the industrial application technology. Furthermore, in order to use the model for the several applications, the model’s specific measures which includes the quantitative methodologies such as analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and data envelopment analysis (DEA) are suggested in accordance with the existing system of the evaluation institution in Korea.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 국문요약
• ABSTRACT
• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 연구개발 성과추적평가의 정책적 배경
• Ⅲ. 연구개발 성과추적평가의 이론적 배경: 논리모형
• Ⅳ. 연구개발 성과추적평가관리 시스템 모형
• Ⅴ. 연구개발 성과추적평가관리 시스템 활용방안
• Ⅵ. 결론
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 민철구, "출연기관 활성화를 위한 기관평가모델" 서울: 과학기술정책연구원 1994

2 이찬구, "연구회 평가제도의 한국과 영국간 비교" 한국행정연구원 13 (13): 3-41, 2005

3 김성수, "연구개발 분야에서 성과관리제도의 도입현황 분석" 한국기술혁신학회 8 (8): 237-260, 2005

4 이길우, "기관평가제도 운영의 영향요인에 관한 연구­과학기술계 정부출연연구기관을 중심으로­" 한국기술혁신학회 8 (8): 524-553, 2005

5 정윤, "국내외 과학기술동향과 새로운 과학기술혁신체제의 구축" 2007

6 Korhonen, P., "Value Efficiency Analysis of Academic Research" 130 (130): 121-132, 2001

7 McEwan, K. L., "Using a Logic Model to Focus Health Services on Population Health Goals" 121 : 167-174, 1997

8 Torvatn,H., "Using Program Theory Models in Evaluation of Industrial Modernization Programs: Three Case Studies" 22 (22): 73-82, 1999

9 Carroll, J., "Theory to Practice: Using the Logic Model to Organize and Report Research Results in a Collaborative Project" 93 (93): 63-65, 2001

10 Bickman,L., "The Functions of Program Theory" 33 : 5-18, 1987

11 Saaty,T, "The Analytic Hierarchy Process" New York: McGraw-Hill 1980

12 Rush, B., "Program Logic Models: Expanding Their Role and Structure for Program Planning and Evaluation" 6 (6): 95-106, 1991

13 Cherchye, L., "On Research Efficiency: A Micro Analysis of Dutch University Research in Economic and Business Management" 34 (34): 495-516, 2005

14 Jordan, G. B., "Measuring the Performance of Research and Technology Programs: A Balanced Scorecard Approach" 22 (22): 13-20, 1987

15 Kocher, M. G., "Measuring Productivity of Research in Economics: A Cross-Country Study using DEA" 40 (40): 314-332, 2006

16 Charnes, A., "Measuring Efficiency of Decision Making Units" 2 (2): 429-444, 1978

17 OECD, "Main Science and Technology Indicators" OECD 2008

18 Corbeil,R., "Logic on logic models" Ottawa: Office of the Comptroller General of Canada 1986

19 UW-Extension, "Logic Models: a Framework for Program Planning and Evaluation, University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation"

20 McLaughlin, J. A., "Logic Models: A Tool for Telling Your Program's Performance Story" 22 (22): 65-72, 1999

21 Kellogg Foundation, "Logic Model Development Guide" Kellogg Foundation. 2004

22 Paradi, J. C., "Knowledge Worker Performance Analysis using DEA: An Application to Engineering Design Teams at Bell Canada" 49 (49): 161-172, 2002

23 Swink, M., "Faster, Better, Cheaper: A Study of NPD Project Efficiency and Performance Tradeoffs" 24 (24): 542-562, 2006

24 Wholey,J.S., "Evaluation and Effective Public Management" Boston: Little, Brown 1983

25 Wholey,J.S., "Evaluability assessment: Developing Program Theory, in L. Bickman, (Ed.), Using Program Theory in Evaluation" San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers 77-92, 1987

26 UW-Extension, "Documenting Outcomes in Tobacco Control Programs"

27 Cooper, W. W., "Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software" Boston: Kluwer Academic 2000

28 Eilat, H., "Constructing and Evaluating Balanced Portfolios of R&D Projects with Interactions: A DEA Based Methodology" 172 (172): 1018-1039, 2006

29 Lee, H., "Comparative Evaluation of Performance of National R&D Programs with Heterogeneous Objectives" 2008

30 Garg, K. C., "Assessment of Impact of AICTE Funding on R&D and Educational Development" 65 (65): 151-160, 2005

31 Framst,G., "Application of Program Logic Model to Agricultural Technology Transfer Programs" 10 (10): 123-132, 1995

32 Lee, H., "An International Comparison of R&D Efficiency: DEA Approach" 13 (13): 207-221, 2005

33 Feng, Y. J., "An AHP/DEA Method for Measurement of the Efficiency of R&D Management Activities in Universities" 11 (11): 181-191, 2004

34 Ruegg, R., "A Toolkit for Evaluating Public R&D Investment Models, Methods, and Findings from ATP's First Decade, Advanced Technology Program"

35 Edwards,D.E., "A Community Approach for Native American Drug and Alcohol Prevention Programs: A Logic Model Framework" 13 (13): 43-62, 1995

36 Wang, E. C., ""Relative Efficiency of R&D Activities: A Cross-Country Study Accounting for Environmental Factors in the DEA Approach" 36 (36): 260-273, 2007