서울소재 교육대학원 가정교육전공 교육과정에 대한 운영실태와 교육대학원생의 인식 = The Operation of Home Economics Education Course in Graduate School of Education and the Graduate Students' Perception

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study aimed to examine the operation of the Home Economics education courses in the graduate schools of education, and to find out how graduate students perceive them. Data were collected with the use of handbooks issued by 11 graduate schools of education located in Seoul, and through telephone conversations with the administrative staff. To determine how graduate students majoring in Home Economics perceive their Home Economics courses, a survey was conducted among the graduate students in 10 graduate schools of education, and a total of 131 accomplished questionnaires were used for data analysis.
The results of the study are as follows.
First, all 11 graduate schools aimed to retrain their teachers, enhance their professionalism, and produce home economics education experts. The Home Economics Education courses come in two strands; a teacher's course and a major course. Most of the schools require a total of 30 credits. All Schools lack professors. Only 3 graduate schools have a home Economics Department in the College of Education. All graduate schools are offering a teacher’s course based on a teacher’s certification system. In a major course, Home Economics education has the largest number of subjects, with Clothing and Textiles and Food and Nutrition being given greater emphasis, and Consumer Economics, Home Economics Management, Child Care, and Family and Housing Studies being given less emphasis.
Second, they mostly regard the graduate school of education as producer of experts, followed by producers of teachers and teacher re-trainers. Those who were majoring in Home Economics Education in college, and the teachers, are more interested in teacher re-training, while the non-teachers and those who were not majoring in Home Economics Education are more interested in producing teachers. They are less satisfied with the operation of the graduate school of education. But they are generally satisfied with the Home Economics Education course. Graduate students registered the lowest satisfaction with a major course, especially experimental subjects. For a teacher's course, the graduate students who are not teachers exhibited higher satisfaction, whereas the teachers showed lower satisfaction. But teachers registered more satisfaction with the practical use of major subjects in the educational field, thinking that their major was a big help in their work at a school. As for what has to be improved with regard to the Home Economics Education course, many cited the necessity of securing a good faculty and expanding the major subjects.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 서울대학교, "서울대학교 30년사" 서울대학교 출판부 1975

2 육개혁심의회, "대학원교육의 내실화 방안" 교육개혁심의회 1987

3 김미경, "교육대학원의 프로그램 운영에 대한 가정교육전공자의 인식 조사연구" 경상대학교 1997

4 박덕규, "교육대학원의 기능 및 역할 제고 방안 연구" 교육대학원 발전방안연구 위원회 1993

5 심귀섭, "교육대학원의 교육환경에 관한 연구:사립 교육대학원생들의 의견을 중심으로" 이화여자대학교 1993

6 백인순, "교육대학원에 대한 교사의 인식 조사 연구" 숙명여자대학교 2000

7 김성길, "교육대학원 전문화 방향에 관한 연구" 연세대학교 2001

8 이종성, "교육대학원 발전을 위한 진단과 개혁과제" 연세교육과학 1995

9 김정미, "교과교육과 교육대학원 기능에 관한 연구" 연세대학교 1995

10 교육과학기술부, "06, 07년 교원양성기관현황"