RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    2007 개정 국어과 화법 교육과정 중 협상 담화 유형에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Negotiation in the 2007 Revision of Speech Curriculum

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A77041257

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study is about the `negotiation` which was new type of discours in the 2007 revision of speech curriculum. I tried to re-conceptualize the negotiation as transactional activity to increase the red-interests between the negotiators. And then, I reduced the interdependency which can be re-category as interdependency of negotiators, of informations, of outcomes. Three interdependency has each involved dilemma of needs, of reliance, of goals. And the type of negotiation can be devide the number of negotiators, of issues, power of negotiators, decision-maker, and I explained the meaning of type of negotiations. After then, I introduced the step of negotiation, first step is to identify issues and alternatives, second step is to analysis to difference of red interests, third step is to offer and trade-off, next step is to accept or reject the solution which has been just offer to each other. The last step is to fulfill a contract or re-negotiation, or broken off the negotiation. I explained the five strategies, which are to solve the conflict between negotiators. One is turtle style which evades the conflicts by himself, the second is shark style which uses the power to the other negotiator, the third is fox style which compromise conflicts, the fourth is teddy-bear style which weaken the conflicts, the fifth is owl style which solve the conflicts to benefact each other`s interests. When you confronted the diverse situations which can not be solved by owl style, first you would use the red-interests, and then the right of you, and last the power of you.
    번역하기

    This study is about the `negotiation` which was new type of discours in the 2007 revision of speech curriculum. I tried to re-conceptualize the negotiation as transactional activity to increase the red-interests between the negotiators. And then, I re...

    This study is about the `negotiation` which was new type of discours in the 2007 revision of speech curriculum. I tried to re-conceptualize the negotiation as transactional activity to increase the red-interests between the negotiators. And then, I reduced the interdependency which can be re-category as interdependency of negotiators, of informations, of outcomes. Three interdependency has each involved dilemma of needs, of reliance, of goals. And the type of negotiation can be devide the number of negotiators, of issues, power of negotiators, decision-maker, and I explained the meaning of type of negotiations. After then, I introduced the step of negotiation, first step is to identify issues and alternatives, second step is to analysis to difference of red interests, third step is to offer and trade-off, next step is to accept or reject the solution which has been just offer to each other. The last step is to fulfill a contract or re-negotiation, or broken off the negotiation. I explained the five strategies, which are to solve the conflict between negotiators. One is turtle style which evades the conflicts by himself, the second is shark style which uses the power to the other negotiator, the third is fox style which compromise conflicts, the fourth is teddy-bear style which weaken the conflicts, the fifth is owl style which solve the conflicts to benefact each other`s interests. When you confronted the diverse situations which can not be solved by owl style, first you would use the red-interests, and then the right of you, and last the power of you.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 임칠성, "화법 교육과정의 ‘담화 유형’에 대한 범주적 접근" 한국화법학회 (12) : 149-188, 2008

    2 정민주, "협상의 개념과 전략에 관한 국어교육적 고찰" 국어교육학회 (31) : 459-485, 2008

    3 교육과학기술부, "중학교 교육과정 해설 Ⅱ" 2008

    4 곽노성, "국제협상론" 경문사 2006

    5 이재기, "국제통상론" 시그마프레스 2007

    6 노은희, "국어과 선택 과목 ‘화법’ 교육과정 개선을 위한 논의" 국어교육학회 (28) : 301-326, 2007

    7 노은희, "고등학교 국어과 교육과정 해설 연구 개발" 한국교육과정평가원 2008

    8 그로비스 매니지먼트 인스티튜트, "경영전략" 21세기북스 2007

    9 Thomson, L. L.(, "The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator in: 지성과 감성의 협상 기술" 한울아카데미 2006

    10 Myers, G. E., "The Dynamics of Human Communication:A Laboratory Approache in: 대인 관계와 의사소통" 집문당 1995

    1 임칠성, "화법 교육과정의 ‘담화 유형’에 대한 범주적 접근" 한국화법학회 (12) : 149-188, 2008

    2 정민주, "협상의 개념과 전략에 관한 국어교육적 고찰" 국어교육학회 (31) : 459-485, 2008

    3 교육과학기술부, "중학교 교육과정 해설 Ⅱ" 2008

    4 곽노성, "국제협상론" 경문사 2006

    5 이재기, "국제통상론" 시그마프레스 2007

    6 노은희, "국어과 선택 과목 ‘화법’ 교육과정 개선을 위한 논의" 국어교육학회 (28) : 301-326, 2007

    7 노은희, "고등학교 국어과 교육과정 해설 연구 개발" 한국교육과정평가원 2008

    8 그로비스 매니지먼트 인스티튜트, "경영전략" 21세기북스 2007

    9 Thomson, L. L.(, "The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator in: 지성과 감성의 협상 기술" 한울아카데미 2006

    10 Myers, G. E., "The Dynamics of Human Communication:A Laboratory Approache in: 대인 관계와 의사소통" 집문당 1995

    11 Johnson, D. W., "Joining Together:Group Theory and Group Skills in: 협동 학습을 위한 참여적 학습자" 아카데미프레스 2004

    12 Reardon, K. K., "Interpersonal Communication:Where Minds Meet in: 대인 의사소통" 한국문화사 1997

    13 Fisher, R., "Getting to Yes:Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In in: Yes를 이끌어내는 협상법" 장락 2009

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-06-30 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Speech Research -> Journal of Speech Communication KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.89 0.89 0.9
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.84 0.91 1.348 0.28
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼