This thesis intends to read the Korean teachers` assumption about grammatical ability throughout the dual-purpose rubric. I hypothesized that all the teachers(including pre-service teachers) might expect the various thinking features from their learne...
This thesis intends to read the Korean teachers` assumption about grammatical ability throughout the dual-purpose rubric. I hypothesized that all the teachers(including pre-service teachers) might expect the various thinking features from their learners in the grammatical items, though some teachers affirm that the grammar is equivalent to the grammar standards or norm. At first, 17 pre-service and in-service teachers who could be directly trained consensus the meaning dual-purpose rubric. Then they responded the successive questionnaire. The research methods are like this: 10 grammar items which were in the term-period test of K(located in Seoul) High School are adopted. Then four teachers were asked that they judged the thinking features and the degree of difficulty. On the basis of that result, the same items are given to 17 teachers(both pre-service and in-service). At this time they describe the reason why they`ve chosen that kind of features.