RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    문법 능력에 대한 인식 양상 연구 -국어과 평가 문항의 이원목적분류표를 중심으로- = Research on the Korean Teachers` Assumption about the Grammatical Ability

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A77023369

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This thesis intends to read the Korean teachers` assumption about grammatical ability throughout the dual-purpose rubric. I hypothesized that all the teachers(including pre-service teachers) might expect the various thinking features from their learners in the grammatical items, though some teachers affirm that the grammar is equivalent to the grammar standards or norm. At first, 17 pre-service and in-service teachers who could be directly trained consensus the meaning dual-purpose rubric. Then they responded the successive questionnaire. The research methods are like this: 10 grammar items which were in the term-period test of K(located in Seoul) High School are adopted. Then four teachers were asked that they judged the thinking features and the degree of difficulty. On the basis of that result, the same items are given to 17 teachers(both pre-service and in-service). At this time they describe the reason why they`ve chosen that kind of features.
    번역하기

    This thesis intends to read the Korean teachers` assumption about grammatical ability throughout the dual-purpose rubric. I hypothesized that all the teachers(including pre-service teachers) might expect the various thinking features from their learne...

    This thesis intends to read the Korean teachers` assumption about grammatical ability throughout the dual-purpose rubric. I hypothesized that all the teachers(including pre-service teachers) might expect the various thinking features from their learners in the grammatical items, though some teachers affirm that the grammar is equivalent to the grammar standards or norm. At first, 17 pre-service and in-service teachers who could be directly trained consensus the meaning dual-purpose rubric. Then they responded the successive questionnaire. The research methods are like this: 10 grammar items which were in the term-period test of K(located in Seoul) High School are adopted. Then four teachers were asked that they judged the thinking features and the degree of difficulty. On the basis of that result, the same items are given to 17 teachers(both pre-service and in-service). At this time they describe the reason why they`ve chosen that kind of features.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼