RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국인의 거짓말 유형과 정당화 양식 연구 = Justifications and patterns of everyday lies by Korean people

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104581683

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This research examined the specificity of reasoning and cultural universality of lying, by analyzing patterns of lie-telling and the justifications offered by Korean people when telling everyday lies. Two hundred and fourteen participants completed essays on their lying; focusing on those lies that were most prominent in their memories. Directions asked them to describe their experience, citing the time, situation, targeted person, outcomes, and their feelings about the outcomes. These essays were then analyzed by means of a coding scheme that contained within it three domains (moral, personal, and socio-conventional) and twelve justification codes. The results indicate that lies most frequently occur within close relationships rather than other forms of relationships. In close relationships, people reported that the primary motivation behind their lying was personal interest or preferences, and this was most common in middle school students. The relationships in which they told lies ranged from family to other social relationships, as their ages increased. There were significant differences in justifications offered for lying among the different age groups. Lies in the personal domain were usually justified as a means of maintaining harmony or trust in relationships, which may relate to an important characteristic of the collective cultural forces at work in Korean society.
    번역하기

    This research examined the specificity of reasoning and cultural universality of lying, by analyzing patterns of lie-telling and the justifications offered by Korean people when telling everyday lies. Two hundred and fourteen participants completed es...

    This research examined the specificity of reasoning and cultural universality of lying, by analyzing patterns of lie-telling and the justifications offered by Korean people when telling everyday lies. Two hundred and fourteen participants completed essays on their lying; focusing on those lies that were most prominent in their memories. Directions asked them to describe their experience, citing the time, situation, targeted person, outcomes, and their feelings about the outcomes. These essays were then analyzed by means of a coding scheme that contained within it three domains (moral, personal, and socio-conventional) and twelve justification codes. The results indicate that lies most frequently occur within close relationships rather than other forms of relationships. In close relationships, people reported that the primary motivation behind their lying was personal interest or preferences, and this was most common in middle school students. The relationships in which they told lies ranged from family to other social relationships, as their ages increased. There were significant differences in justifications offered for lying among the different age groups. Lies in the personal domain were usually justified as a means of maintaining harmony or trust in relationships, which may relate to an important characteristic of the collective cultural forces at work in Korean society.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 정현주, "아동의 거짓말 개념정의 및 도덕판단에 대한 겸손함의 효과" 16 : 243-258, 2006

    2 하병학, "거짓말하는 한국사회" 54 : 164-176, 2002

    3 Perkins, S. A, "To lie or not to lie: To whom and under what circumstances" 78 : 609-621, 2007

    4 Jensen, L. A., "The right to do wrong: Lying to parents among adolescents and emerging adults" 33 : 101-112, 2004

    5 Piaget, J, "The moral judgement of the child" 1932

    6 Ikuenobe, P, "The meta-ethical issue of the nature of lying: Implications for moral education" 21 : 37-63, 2002

    7 Sweetser,E.E, "The definition of lie: An examination of the folk models underlying a semantic prototype in Cultural models in language and thought (pp.43-66)" Cambridge University Press 1987

    8 Hartshorne, H., "Studies in the nature of character (Vol. 1. Studies in deceit)" MacMillan 1928

    9 Chandler, M., "Small-scale deceit: Deception as a marker of two-, three-, and four-year-olds' early theories of mind" 60 : 1263-1277, 1989

    10 Peskin,J, "Ruse and representations: On children's ability to conceal information" 28 : 84-89, 1992

    1 정현주, "아동의 거짓말 개념정의 및 도덕판단에 대한 겸손함의 효과" 16 : 243-258, 2006

    2 하병학, "거짓말하는 한국사회" 54 : 164-176, 2002

    3 Perkins, S. A, "To lie or not to lie: To whom and under what circumstances" 78 : 609-621, 2007

    4 Jensen, L. A., "The right to do wrong: Lying to parents among adolescents and emerging adults" 33 : 101-112, 2004

    5 Piaget, J, "The moral judgement of the child" 1932

    6 Ikuenobe, P, "The meta-ethical issue of the nature of lying: Implications for moral education" 21 : 37-63, 2002

    7 Sweetser,E.E, "The definition of lie: An examination of the folk models underlying a semantic prototype in Cultural models in language and thought (pp.43-66)" Cambridge University Press 1987

    8 Hartshorne, H., "Studies in the nature of character (Vol. 1. Studies in deceit)" MacMillan 1928

    9 Chandler, M., "Small-scale deceit: Deception as a marker of two-, three-, and four-year-olds' early theories of mind" 60 : 1263-1277, 1989

    10 Peskin,J, "Ruse and representations: On children's ability to conceal information" 28 : 84-89, 1992

    11 Engels, R. C. M. E., "Lying behavor, family functioning and adjustment in early adolescence" 35 : 949-958, 2006

    12 Lee,K, "Lying as doing deceptive things with words:A speech act theoretical perspective.In J.W.Astington(Ed.),Mind in the making(pp.177-196)" Blackwell Publishers 2000

    13 Kim, J. M, "Korean and American children's concepts of adult and peer authority" 5 : 310-329, 1996

    14 Boyes, M. C., "Implications of cultural diversity for the universality claims of Kohlberg's theory of moral reasoning" 31 : 44-59, 1988

    15 Turiel, E, "Flexibilities of mind: Conflict and culture" 47 : 158-178, 2004

    16 DePaulo, B.M, "Everyday lies in close and casual relationships" 74 : 63-79, 1998

    17 Smetana, J. G., "Disclosure and secrecy in adolescent-parent relationships" 77 : 201-217, 2006

    18 Talwar, V, "Development of lying to conceal a transgression: Children's control of expressive behaviour during verval deception" 26 : 436-444, 2002

    19 Polak, A., "Deception by young children following noncomplianc" 35 : 561-568, 1999

    20 Shweder, R. A., "Culture and moral development in The emergence of morality in young children (pp.1-83)" University of Chicago Press 1987

    21 Fu, G., "Cross-cultural differences in children's choices, categorizations, and evaluations of truths and lies" 43 : 278-293, 2007

    22 Lee, K., "Chinese and Canadian children's evaluations of lying and truth telling: Similarities and differences in the context of pro- and antisocial behaviors" 68 : 924-934, 1997

    23 Tisak, M. S, "Children's conceptions of moral and prudential rules" 55 : 1030-1039, 1984

    24 Bussey, K, "Children's categorization and evaluation of different types of lies and truths" 70 : 1338-1347, 1999

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.88 1.88 1.8
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.85 2.02 2.36 0.43
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼